Elisabetta Patorno1, Ajinkya Pawar1, Deborah J Wexler2, Robert J Glynn1, Lily G Bessette1, Julie M Paik1,3, Mehdi Najafzadeh1, Kimberly G Brodovicz4,5, Anouk Déruaz-Luyet4, Sebastian Schneeweiss1. 1. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Massachusetts General Hospital Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany. 5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate effectiveness and safety outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating empagliflozin versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor treatment across the broad spectrum of cardiovascular risk. METHODS: In a population-based cohort study we identified 39 072 pairs of 1:1 propensity score-matched adult patients with T2D initiating empagliflozin or DPP-4 inhibitors, using data from 2 US commercial insurance databases and Medicare between August 2014 and September 2017. The primary outcomes were a composite of myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). Safety outcomes were bone fractures, lower-limb amputations (LLAs), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and acute kidney injury (AKI). We estimated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusting for more than 140 baseline covariates. RESULTS: Study participants had a mean age of 60 years and only 28% had established cardiovascular disease. Compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, empagliflozin was associated with similar risk of MI/stroke (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.81-1.21]), and lower risk of HHF (HR 0.48 [95% CI 0.35-0.67] and 0.63 [95% CI 0.54-0.74], based on a primary and any heart failure discharge diagnosis, respectively). The HR was 0.52 (95% CI 0.38-0.72) for all-cause mortality (ACM) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.70-0.98) for a composite of MI/stroke/ACM. Empagliflozin was associated with a similar risk of LLA and fractures, an increased risk of DKA (HR 1.71 [95% CI 1.08-2.71]) and a decreased risk of AKI (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.43-0.85]). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, the initiation of empagliflozin versus a DPP-4 inhibitor was associated with a lower risk of HHF, ACM and MI/stroke/ACM, a similar risk of MI/stroke, and a safety profile consistent with documented information.
AIM: To investigate effectiveness and safety outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating empagliflozin versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor treatment across the broad spectrum of cardiovascular risk. METHODS: In a population-based cohort study we identified 39 072 pairs of 1:1 propensity score-matched adult patients with T2D initiating empagliflozin or DPP-4 inhibitors, using data from 2 US commercial insurance databases and Medicare between August 2014 and September 2017. The primary outcomes were a composite of myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). Safety outcomes were bone fractures, lower-limb amputations (LLAs), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and acute kidney injury (AKI). We estimated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusting for more than 140 baseline covariates. RESULTS: Study participants had a mean age of 60 years and only 28% had established cardiovascular disease. Compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, empagliflozin was associated with similar risk of MI/stroke (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.81-1.21]), and lower risk of HHF (HR 0.48 [95% CI 0.35-0.67] and 0.63 [95% CI 0.54-0.74], based on a primary and any heart failure discharge diagnosis, respectively). The HR was 0.52 (95% CI 0.38-0.72) for all-cause mortality (ACM) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.70-0.98) for a composite of MI/stroke/ACM. Empagliflozin was associated with a similar risk of LLA and fractures, an increased risk of DKA (HR 1.71 [95% CI 1.08-2.71]) and a decreased risk of AKI (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.43-0.85]). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, the initiation of empagliflozin versus a DPP-4 inhibitor was associated with a lower risk of HHF, ACM and MI/stroke/ACM, a similar risk of MI/stroke, and a safety profile consistent with documented information.
Authors: Peter M Wahl; Keith Rodgers; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Brian F Gage; Javed Butler; Charles Wilmer; Marshall Nash; Gregory Esper; Norman Gitlin; Neal Osborn; Louise J Short; Rhonda L Bohn Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Deepak L Bhatt; Michael Szarek; P Gabriel Steg; Christopher P Cannon; Lawrence A Leiter; Darren K McGuire; Julia B Lewis; Matthew C Riddle; Adriaan A Voors; Marco Metra; Lars H Lund; Michel Komajda; Jeffrey M Testani; Christopher S Wilcox; Piotr Ponikowski; Renato D Lopes; Subodh Verma; Pablo Lapuerta; Bertram Pitt Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William V Bobo; William O Cooper; Richard A Epstein; Patrick G Arbogast; Jackie Mounsey; Wayne A Ray Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Thahesh Tharmaraja; Jamie S Y Ho; Ching-Hui Sia; Nicole-Ann Lim; Yao Feng Chong; Amanda Y L Lim; Rahul R Rathakrishnan; Leonard L L Yeo; Vijay K Sharma; Benjamin Y Q Tan Journal: Ther Adv Chronic Dis Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 5.091
Authors: Fahad M Althobaiti; Safaa M Alsanosi; Alaa H Falemban; Abdullah R Alzahrani; Salma A Fataha; Sara O Salih; Ali M Alrumaih; Khalid N Alotaibi; Hazim M Althobaiti; Saeed S Al-Ghamdi; Nahla Ayoub Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 4.964