Deepak L Bhatt1, Michael Szarek1, P Gabriel Steg1, Christopher P Cannon1, Lawrence A Leiter1, Darren K McGuire1, Julia B Lewis1, Matthew C Riddle1, Adriaan A Voors1, Marco Metra1, Lars H Lund1, Michel Komajda1, Jeffrey M Testani1, Christopher S Wilcox1, Piotr Ponikowski1, Renato D Lopes1, Subodh Verma1, Pablo Lapuerta1, Bertram Pitt1. 1. From Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston (D.L.B., C.P.C.); Colorado Prevention Center Clinical Research and Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (M.S.); State University of New York Downstate School of Public Health, Brooklyn (M.S.); Université de Paris, French Alliance for Cardiovascular Trials, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bichat, INSERM Unité 1148 (P.G.S.), and Paris Sorbonne University and Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph (M.K.), Paris; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (L.A.L., S.V.) and the Divisions of Endocrinology and Metabolism (L.A.L.) and Cardiac Surgery (S.V.), St. Michael's Hospital, and the Departments of Medicine and Nutritional Sciences (L.A.L) and Surgery and Pharmacology and Toxicology (S.V.), University of Toronto, Toronto; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas (D.K.M.), and Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, The Woodlands (P.L.) - both in Texas; Vanderbilt University, Nashville (J.B.L.); the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Clinical Nutrition, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.C.R.); University of Groningen-University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (A.A.V); Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (M.M.); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (L.H.L.); Yale University, New Haven, CT (J.M.T.); Georgetown University, Washington, DC (C.S.W.); Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland (P.P.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (R.D.L.); and the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (B.P.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes among patients with stable heart failure. However, the safety and efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors when initiated soon after an episode of decompensated heart failure are unknown. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, double-blind trial in which patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were recently hospitalized for worsening heart failure were randomly assigned to receive sotagliflozin or placebo. The primary end point was the total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes and hospitalizations and urgent visits for heart failure (first and subsequent events). The trial ended early because of loss of funding from the sponsor. RESULTS: A total of 1222 patients underwent randomization (608 to the sotagliflozin group and 614 to theplacebo group) and were followed for a median of 9.0 months; the first dose of sotagliflozin or placebo was administered before discharge in 48.8% and a median of 2 days after discharge in 51.2%. Among these patients, 600 primary end-point events occurred (245 in the sotagliflozin group and 355 in the placebo group). The rate (the number of events per 100 patient-years) of primary end-point events was lower in the sotagliflozin group than in the placebo group (51.0 vs. 76.3; hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.85; P<0.001). The rate of death from cardiovascular causes was 10.6 in the sotagliflozin group and 12.5 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.22); the rate of death from any cause was 13.5 in the sotagliflozin group and 16.3 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.14). Diarrhea was more common with sotagliflozin than with placebo (6.1% vs. 3.4%), as was severe hypoglycemia (1.5% vs. 0.3%). The percentage of patients with hypotension was similar in the sotagliflozin group and the placebo group (6.0% and 4.6%, respectively), as was the percentage with acute kidney injury (4.1% and 4.4%, respectively). The benefits of sotagliflozin were consistent in the prespecified subgroups of patients stratified according to the timing of the first dose. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure, sotagliflozin therapy, initiated before or shortly after discharge, resulted in a significantly lower total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes and hospitalizations and urgent visits for heart failure than placebo. (Funded by Sanofi and Lexicon Pharmaceuticals; SOLOIST-WHF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03521934.).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes among patients with stable heart failure. However, the safety and efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors when initiated soon after an episode of decompensated heart failure are unknown. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, double-blind trial in which patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were recently hospitalized for worsening heart failure were randomly assigned to receive sotagliflozin or placebo. The primary end point was the total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes and hospitalizations and urgent visits for heart failure (first and subsequent events). The trial ended early because of loss of funding from the sponsor. RESULTS: A total of 1222 patients underwent randomization (608 to the sotagliflozin group and 614 to the placebo group) and were followed for a median of 9.0 months; the first dose of sotagliflozin or placebo was administered before discharge in 48.8% and a median of 2 days after discharge in 51.2%. Among these patients, 600 primary end-point events occurred (245 in the sotagliflozin group and 355 in the placebo group). The rate (the number of events per 100 patient-years) of primary end-point events was lower in the sotagliflozin group than in the placebo group (51.0 vs. 76.3; hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.85; P<0.001). The rate of death from cardiovascular causes was 10.6 in the sotagliflozin group and 12.5 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.22); the rate of death from any cause was 13.5 in the sotagliflozin group and 16.3 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.14). Diarrhea was more common with sotagliflozin than with placebo (6.1% vs. 3.4%), as was severe hypoglycemia (1.5% vs. 0.3%). The percentage of patients with hypotension was similar in the sotagliflozin group and the placebo group (6.0% and 4.6%, respectively), as was the percentage with acute kidney injury (4.1% and 4.4%, respectively). The benefits of sotagliflozin were consistent in the prespecified subgroups of patients stratified according to the timing of the first dose. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure, sotagliflozin therapy, initiated before or shortly after discharge, resulted in a significantly lower total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes and hospitalizations and urgent visits for heart failure than placebo. (Funded by Sanofi and Lexicon Pharmaceuticals; SOLOIST-WHF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03521934.).
Authors: Ofri Mosenzon; Stefano Del Prato; Meir Schechter; Lawrence A Leiter; Antonio Ceriello; Ralph A DeFronzo; Itamar Raz Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 9.951
Authors: Marc Evans; Angharad R Morgan; Zaheer Yousef; Gethin Ellis; Umesh Dashora; Dipesh C Patel; Pam Brown; Wasim Hanif; Johnathan N Townend; Naresh Kanumilli; Jim Moore; John P H Wilding; Stephen C Bain Journal: Drugs Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 9.546