| Literature DB >> 34729155 |
Youxia Liu1, Huyan Yu2, Sijing Wu2, Xia Yang2, Congcong Cao3, Fanghao Wang2, Junya Jia1, Tiekun Yan2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our previous study revealed that plasma levels of a-2,6-sialyltransferase 1 (ST6GAL1) were increased in patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN). ST6GAL1 catalyzes terminal sialylation of IgG to shift the antibody effector function to the anti-inflammatory pattern. However, the role of plasma ST6GAL1 in the progression of IgAN and underlying mechanisms are still unknown.Entities:
Keywords: IL-6 and TNF-α; IgA nephropathy; ST6GAL1; kidney outcomes; sialylated IgG
Year: 2021 PMID: 34729155 PMCID: PMC8516375 DOI: 10.1177/20406223211048644
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ther Adv Chronic Dis ISSN: 2040-6223 Impact factor: 5.091
The baseline data for IgAN patients with lower and higher ST6GAL1 levels.
| Characters | Mean ± SD or |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low ST6GAL1 ( | High ST6GAL1 ( | ||
| Gender (M/F) | 44 (49)/46 (51) | 47 (52)/43 (48) | 0.65 |
| Age (mean ± SD, year) | 40.01 ± 13.11 | 39.84 ± 13.63 | 0.93 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 130.43 ± 17.81 | 134.84 ± 17.4 | 0.09 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 80.59 ± 11.69 | 83.47 ± 11.72 | 0.1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.14 ± 4.21 | 25.28 ± 3.35 | 0.06 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 131.58 ± 18.13 | 133.08 ± 20.13 | 0.6 |
| Serum albumin (g/L) | 37.04 ± 5.06 | 37.03 ± 5.03 | 0.98 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.69 ± 1 | 2.78 ± 2.66 | 0.001 |
| Serum creatinine (μmol/L) | 87.47 ± 47.81 | 100.96 ± 47.78 | 0.06 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 102.18 ± 51.62 | 84.81 ± 33.6 | 0.008 |
| Uric acid (μmol/L) | 357.21 ± 97.52 | 401.99 ± 107.09 | 0.004 |
| Serum IgA (mg/dL) | 313.22 ± 121.19 | 573.74 ± 418.8 | 0.001 |
| Serum IgG (mg/dL) | 1051.3 ± 261.4 | 889.42 ± 420.69 | 0.003 |
| Serum IgM (mg/dL) | 119.39 ± 64.23 | 113.31 ± 54.85 | 0.513 |
| Serum IgE (mg/dL) | 66.4 ± 167.19 | 158.64 ± 495.06 | 0.11 |
| Serum C3 (mg/dL) | 86.63 ± 15.6 | 94.47 ± 17.86 | 0.003 |
| Serum C4 (mg/dL) | 21.95 ± 5.95 | 25.15 ± 8.48 | 0.005 |
| Proteinuria (mg/d) | 1409.83 ± 1373.14 | 2116.87 ± 1955 | 0.006 |
| Urine RBC (/HP) | 35.93 ± 61.24 | 80.58 ± 257.26 | 0.11 |
| Oxford classification | |||
| M score (M0/M1) | 11 (12)/79 (88) | 10 (11)/80 (89) | 0.82 |
| E score (E0/E1) | 53 (59)/ 37 (41) | 52 (58)/38 (42) | 0.89 |
| S score (S0/S1) | 44 (49)/46 (51) | 28 (31)/62 (69) | 0.02 |
| T score (T0/T1/T2) | 35 (39)/50 (56)/5 (5) | 27 (30)/50 (55)/13 (15) | 0.15 |
| C score (C0/C1/C2) | 23 (26)/54 (60)/13 (14) | 32 (36)/50 (55)/8 (9) | 0.25 |
BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IgAN, immunoglobulin A nephropathy; RBC, red blood cell; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 1.The correlation between ST6GAL1 and eGFR decline rate.
Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis of ST6GAL1 influencing eGFR decline rate.
| Characteristic | Mean ± SD (pg/mL) | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| ST6GAL1 | 6914 ± 2624 | 3.45 × 10−4 (1.92 × 10−4 to 4.98 × 10−4) | <0.001 | 2.98 × 10−4 (1.51 × 10−4to 4.45 × 10−4) | <0.001 |
| ST6GAL1 dichotomy | |||||
| Lower level | 5009 ± 951 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
| Higher level | 8365 ± 2079 | 1.56 (0.75–2.37) | <0.001 | 1.27 (0.48–2.05) | 0.002 |
CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SD, standard deviation.
Adjusted for eGFR, proteinuria, and systolic pressure.
Figure 2.Kaplan–Meier analysis of proteinuria remission in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients with the median plasma of ST6GAL1.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of ST6GAL1 at baseline influencing proteinuria remission.
| Characteristic | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| ST6GAL1 | 1.0001 (0.999–1.0004) | 0.11 | 1.0001 (0.9999–1.0002) | 0.1 |
| ST6GAL1 dichotomy | ||||
| Lower level | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
| Higher level | 2.05 (1.03–4.06) | 0.04 | 2.09 (1.01–4.31) | 0.04 |
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Adjusted for eGFR, proteinuria, and systolic pressure.
Figure 3.The expression of IL-6 (a) and TNF-α (b) after rST6GAL1 stimulation in supernatant of PBMCs.
Figure 4.SA-IgG production after rST6GAL1 stimulation in supernatant of PBMCs.
Figure 5.The expression of IL-6 (a) and TNF-α (b) after SA-IgG and NSA-IgG stimulation in supernatant of PBMCs.