Literature DB >> 34727337

Cystic (including atypical) and solid breast lesion classification using the different features of quantitative ultrasound parametric images.

A A Kolchev1,2, D V Pasynkov3, I A Egoshin4, I V Kliouchkin5, O O Pasynkova1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The amount of ultrasound (US) breast examinations continues to grow rapidly because of the wider endorsement of breast cancer screening programs. Cysts are the most commonly diagnosed breast lesions. Atypical breast cysts can be a serious differentiation problem in the US. Our goal was to develop noninvasive automated US grayscale image analysis for the cystic and solid breast lesion differentiation based on mathematical image post-processing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a set of 217 ultrasound images of proven 107 cystic (including 53 atypical) and 110 solid lesions. Empirical statistical and morphological models of the lesions were used to obtain features. The AUC indicator and Student's t test were used to assess the quality of the individual features. The Pearson correlation matrix was used to calculate the correlation between various features. The LASSO and stepwise regression methods were used to determine the most significant features. Finally, the lesion classification was carried out by the various methods.
RESULTS: The use of LASSO regression for the feature selection made it possible to select the most significant features for classification. The sensitivity increased from 87.1% to 89.2% and the specificity-from 92.2 to 94.8%. After the correlation matrix construction, it was found that features with a high value of the correlation coefficient (0.72; 0.75) can also be used to improve the quality of the classification.
CONCLUSION: The construction of the empirical model of the lesion pixels brightness behavior can provide parameters that are important for the correct classification of ultrasound images. The optimal set of features with the maximum discriminant characteristics may not be consistent with the correlation of features and the value of the AUC index. Features with a low AUC index (in our case 0.72) can also be important for improving the quality of the classification.
© 2021. CARS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast ultrasound; Classification; Cyst; LASSO method; Solid lesion

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34727337     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02522-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  8 in total

Review 1.  Methods for the segmentation and classification of breast ultrasound images: a review.

Authors:  Ademola E Ilesanmi; Utairat Chaumrattanakul; Stanislav S Makhanov
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-01-11

2.  Automatic ultrasound segmentation and morphology based diagnosis of solid breast tumors.

Authors:  Ruey-Feng Chang; Wen-Jie Wu; Woo Kyung Moon; Dar-Ren Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Multimodality GPU-based computer-assisted diagnosis of breast cancer using ultrasound and digital mammography images.

Authors:  Konstantinos P Sidiropoulos; Spiros A Kostopoulos; Dimitris T Glotsos; Emmanouil I Athanasiadis; Nikos D Dimitropoulos; John T Stonham; Dionisis A Cavouras
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  A Fusion-Based Approach for Breast Ultrasound Image Classification Using Multiple-ROI Texture and Morphological Analyses.

Authors:  Mohammad I Daoud; Tariq M Bdair; Mahasen Al-Najar; Rami Alazrai
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.238

5.  Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matejka Rebolj; Valentina Assi; Adam Brentnall; Dharmishta Parmar; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Breast-lesions characterization using Quantitative Ultrasound features of peritumoral tissue.

Authors:  Ziemowit Klimonda; Piotr Karwat; Katarzyna Dobruch-Sobczak; Hanna Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska; Jerzy Litniewski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  circFAT1(e2) Promotes Papillary Thyroid Cancer Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion via the miRNA-873/ZEB1 Axis.

Authors:  Jiazhe Liu; Hongchang Li; Chuanchao Wei; Junbin Ding; Jingfeng Lu; Gaofeng Pan; Anwei Mao
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Ultrasound characterization of breast masses.

Authors:  Sudheer Gokhale
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.