Literature DB >> 15692761

Automatic ultrasound segmentation and morphology based diagnosis of solid breast tumors.

Ruey-Feng Chang1, Wen-Jie Wu, Woo Kyung Moon, Dar-Ren Chen.   

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) is a useful diagnostic tool to distinguish benign from malignant masses of the breast. It is a very convenient and safe diagnostic method. However, there is a considerable overlap benignancy and malignancy in ultrasonic images and interpretation is subjective. A high performance breast tumors computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system can provide an accurate and reliable diagnostic second opinion for physicians to distinguish benign breast lesions from malignant ones. The potential of sonographic texture analysis to improve breast tumor classifications has been demonstrated. However, the texture analysis is system-dependent. The disadvantages of these systems which use texture analysis to classify tumors are they usually perform well only in one specific ultrasound system. While Morphological based US diagnosis of breast tumor will take the advantage of nearly independent to either the setting of US system and different US machines. In this study, the tumors are segmented using the newly developed level set method at first and then six morphologic features are used to distinguish the benign and malignant cases. The support vector machine (SVM) is used to classify the tumors. There are 210 ultrasonic images of pathologically proven benign breast tumors from 120 patients and carcinomas from 90 patients in the ultrasonic image database. The database contains only one image from each patient. The ultrasonic images are captured at the largest diameter of the tumor. The images are collected consecutively from August 1, 1999 to May 31, 2000; the patients' ages ranged from 18 to 64 years. Sonography is performed using an ATL HDI 3000 system with a L10-5 small part transducer. In the experiment, the accuracy of SVM with shape information for classifying malignancies is 90.95% (191/210), the sensitivity is 88.89% (80/90), the specificity is 92.5% (111/120), the positive predictive value is 89.89% (80/89), and the negative predictive value is 91.74% (111/121).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15692761     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-004-2043-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  26 in total

1.  An effective approach of lesion segmentation within the breast ultrasound image based on the cellular automata principle.

Authors:  Yan Liu; H D Cheng; Jianhua Huang; Yingtao Zhang; Xianglong Tang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Classification of benign and malignant breast masses based on shape and texture features in sonography images.

Authors:  Fahimeh Sadat Zakeri; Hamid Behnam; Nasrin Ahmadinejad
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Ultrasound texture-based CAD system for detecting neuromuscular diseases.

Authors:  Tim König; Johannes Steffen; Marko Rak; Grit Neumann; Ludwig von Rohden; Klaus D Tönnies
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  Methods for the segmentation and classification of breast ultrasound images: a review.

Authors:  Ademola E Ilesanmi; Utairat Chaumrattanakul; Stanislav S Makhanov
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-01-11

5.  An Artificial Immune System-Based Support Vector Machine Approach for Classifying Ultrasound Breast Tumor Images.

Authors:  Wen-Jie Wu; Shih-Wei Lin; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Breast mass classification on sonographic images on the basis of shape analysis.

Authors:  Hamid Behnam; Fahimeh Sadat Zakeri; Nasrin Ahmadinejad
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 7.  Automated breast tumor detection and segmentation with a novel computational framework of whole ultrasound images.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Kai Li; Wenjian Qin; Tiexiang Wen; Ling Li; Jia Wu; Jia Gu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  The diagnostic performance of leak-plugging automated segmentation versus manual tracing of breast lesions on ultrasound images.

Authors:  Hui Xiong; Laith R Sultan; Theodore W Cary; Susan M Schultz; Ghizlane Bouzghar; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2017-01-25

Review 9.  Advances in computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer.

Authors:  Lubomir Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.927

10.  Identification of intrinsic imaging phenotypes for breast cancer tumors: preliminary associations with gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Ahmed Bilal Ashraf; Dania Daye; Sara Gavenonis; Carolyn Mies; Michael Feldman; Mark Rosen; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.