Literature DB >> 34725853

Limitations of clinical trial sample size estimate by subtraction of two measurements.

Kewei Chen1,2,3,4, Xiaojuan Guo4,5, Rong Pan2, Chengjie Xiong6,7, Danielle J Harvey8, Yinghua Chen1,9, Li Yao4, Yi Su1,4, Eric M Reiman1,9,10,11.   

Abstract

In planning randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), researchers frequently rely on the use of existing data obtained from only two time points to estimate sample size via the subtraction of baseline from follow-up measurements in each subject. However, the inadequacy of this method has not been reported. The aim of this study is to discuss the limitation of sample size estimation based on the subtraction of available data from only two time points for RCTs. Mathematical equations are derived to demonstrate the condition under which the obtained data pairs with variable time intervals could be used to adequately estimate sample size. The MRI-based hippocampal volume measurements from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) were used to illustrate the existing bias and variability of estimates. MCS results support the theoretically derived condition under which the subtraction approach may work. MCS also show the systematically under- or over-estimated sample sizes by up to 32.27 % bias. Not used properly, such subtraction approach outputs the same sample size regardless of trial durations partly due to the way measurement errors are handled. Estimating sample size by subtracting two measurements should be treated with caution. Such estimates can be biased, the magnitude of which depends on the planned RCT duration. To estimate sample sizes, we recommend using more than two measurements and more comprehensive approaches such as linear mixed effect models.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  linear mixed effects model; randomized clinical trial; sample size estimation; subtraction; two time point measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34725853      PMCID: PMC8916961          DOI: 10.1002/sim.9244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  30 in total

1.  Community-based studies of Alzheimer's disease: statistical challenges in design and analysis.

Authors:  L A Beckett
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000 Jun 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Annual change in biomarkers and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Laurel A Beckett; Danielle J Harvey; Anthony Gamst; Michael Donohue; John Kornak; Hao Zhang; Julie H Kuo
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 3.  The clinical use of structural MRI in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Giovanni B Frisoni; Nick C Fox; Clifford R Jack; Philip Scheltens; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  Using serial registered brain magnetic resonance imaging to measure disease progression in Alzheimer disease: power calculations and estimates of sample size to detect treatment effects.

Authors:  N C Fox; S Cousens; R Scahill; R J Harvey; M N Rossor
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2000-03

5.  Imaging-based enrichment criteria using deep learning algorithms for efficient clinical trials in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Vamsi K Ithapu; Vikas Singh; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Richard J Chappell; N Maritza Dowling; Sterling C Johnson
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 6.  Brain imaging in the study of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Eric M Reiman; William J Jagust
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Unbiased tensor-based morphometry: improved robustness and sample size estimates for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.

Authors:  Xue Hua; Derrek P Hibar; Christopher R K Ching; Christina P Boyle; Priya Rajagopalan; Boris A Gutman; Alex D Leow; Arthur W Toga; Clifford R Jack; Danielle Harvey; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Core candidate neurochemical and imaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Harald Hampel; Katharina Bürger; Stefan J Teipel; Arun L W Bokde; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 21.566

9.  The preclinical Alzheimer cognitive composite: measuring amyloid-related decline.

Authors:  Michael C Donohue; Reisa A Sperling; David P Salmon; Dorene M Rentz; Rema Raman; Ronald G Thomas; Michael Weiner; Paul S Aisen
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 18.302

10.  Algorithms, atrophy and Alzheimer's disease: cautionary tales for clinical trials.

Authors:  Nick C Fox; Gerard R Ridgway; Jonathan M Schott
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.