Literature DB >> 34725790

Pluripotency Stemness and Cancer: More Questions than Answers.

Jiří Hatina1, Michaela Kripnerová2, Zbyněk Houdek2, Martin Pešta2, Filip Tichánek3.   

Abstract

Embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells provided us with fascinating new knowledge in recent years. Mechanistic insight into intricate regulatory circuitry governing pluripotency stemness and disclosing parallels between pluripotency stemness and cancer instigated numerous studies focusing on roles of pluripotency transcription factors, including Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, Nanog, Sall4 and Tfcp2L1, in cancer. Although generally well substantiated as tumour-promoting factors, oncogenic roles of pluripotency transcription factors and their clinical impacts are revealing themselves as increasingly complex. In certain tumours, both Oct4 and Sox2 behave as genuine oncogenes, and reporter genes driven by composite regulatory elements jointly recognized by both the factors can identify stem-like cells in a proportion of tumours. On the other hand, cancer stem cells seem to be biologically very heterogeneous both among different tumour types and among and even within individual tumours. Pluripotency transcription factors are certainly implicated in cancer stemness, but do not seem to encompass its entire spectrum. Certain cancer stem cells maintain their stemness by biological mechanisms completely different from pluripotency stemness, sometimes even by engaging signalling pathways that promote differentiation of pluripotent stem cells. Moreover, while these signalling pathways may well be antithetical to stemness in pluripotent stem cells, they may cooperate with pluripotency factors in cancer stem cells - a paradigmatic example is provided by the MAPK-AP-1 pathway. Unexpectedly, forced expression of pluripotency transcription factors in cancer cells frequently results in loss of their tumour-initiating ability, their phenotypic reversion and partial epigenetic normalization. Besides the very different signalling contexts operating in pluripotent and cancer stem cells, respectively, the pronounced dose dependency of reprogramming pluripotency factors may also contribute to the frequent loss of tumorigenicity observed in induced pluripotent cancer cells. Finally, contradictory cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous effects of various signalling molecules operate during pluripotency (cancer) reprogramming. The effects of pluripotency transcription factors in cancer are thus best explained within the concept of cancer stem cell heterogeneity.
© 2021. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AP-1; Cancer stem cells; Embryonic stem cells; Induced pluripotent cancer cells; Induced pluripotent stem cells; Pluripotency reprogramming; Pluripotency transcription factors; Sarcoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34725790     DOI: 10.1007/5584_2021_663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  157 in total

1.  SOX2 expression and amplification in gliomas and glioma cell lines.

Authors:  Laura Annovazzi; Marta Mellai; Valentina Caldera; Guido Valente; Davide Schiffer
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.069

2.  Sox2 antagonizes the Hippo pathway to maintain stemness in cancer cells.

Authors:  Upal Basu-Roy; N Sumru Bayin; Kirk Rattanakorn; Eugenia Han; Dimitris G Placantonakis; Alka Mansukhani; Claudio Basilico
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Synergistic activation of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer by Sox2 and Oct-3 depends on protein-protein interactions facilitated by a specific spatial arrangement of factor binding sites.

Authors:  D C Ambrosetti; C Basilico; L Dailey
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Loss of SOX2 expression induces cell motility via vimentin up-regulation and is an unfavorable risk factor for survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Pilar Bayo; Adriana Jou; Albrecht Stenzinger; Chunxuan Shao; Madeleine Gross; Alexandra Jensen; Niels Grabe; Christel Herold Mende; Pantelis Varvaki Rados; Juergen Debus; Wilko Weichert; Peter K Plinkert; Peter Lichter; Kolja Freier; Jochen Hess
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Specific chromosome change, i(12p), in testicular tumours?

Authors:  N B Atkin; M C Baker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-12-11       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  EWSR1-POU5F1 fusion in soft tissue myoepithelial tumors. A molecular analysis of sixty-six cases, including soft tissue, bone, and visceral lesions, showing common involvement of the EWSR1 gene.

Authors:  Cristina R Antonescu; Lei Zhang; Ning-En Chang; Bruce R Pawel; William Travis; Nora Katabi; Morris Edelman; Andrew E Rosenberg; G Petur Nielsen; Paola Dal Cin; Christopher D M Fletcher
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Large-Scale Analysis of Loss of Imprinting in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Shiran Bar; Maya Schachter; Talia Eldar-Geva; Nissim Benvenisty
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Localization of the stem cell markers LGR5 and Nanog in the normal and the cancerous human ovary and their inter-relationship.

Authors:  Abraham Amsterdam; Calanit Raanan; Letizia Schreiber; Ora Freyhan; Lea Schechtman; David Givol
Journal:  Acta Histochem       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  Sox2 gene amplification significantly impacts overall survival in serous epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jimmy Belotte; Nicole M Fletcher; Mitchell Alexis; Robert T Morris; Adnan R Munkarah; Michael P Diamond; Ghassan M Saed
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.060

10.  SOX2 is an amplified lineage-survival oncogene in lung and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Adam J Bass; Hideo Watanabe; Craig H Mermel; Soyoung Yu; Sven Perner; Roel G Verhaak; So Young Kim; Leslie Wardwell; Pablo Tamayo; Irit Gat-Viks; Alex H Ramos; Michele S Woo; Barbara A Weir; Gad Getz; Rameen Beroukhim; Michael O'Kelly; Amit Dutt; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Piotr Dziunycz; Justin Komisarof; Lucian R Chirieac; Christopher J Lafargue; Veit Scheble; Theresia Wilbertz; Changqing Ma; Shilpa Rao; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Douglas B Stairs; Lin Lin; Thomas J Giordano; Patrick Wagner; John D Minna; Adi F Gazdar; Chang Qi Zhu; Marcia S Brose; Ivan Cecconello; Ulysses Ribeiro; Suely K Marie; Olav Dahl; Ramesh A Shivdasani; Ming-Sound Tsao; Mark A Rubin; Kwok K Wong; Aviv Regev; William C Hahn; David G Beer; Anil K Rustgi; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-10-04       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers of Cancer Stem Cells for Experimental Research and Clinical Application.

Authors:  Shigeo Saito; Chia-Chen Ku; Kenly Wuputra; Jia-Bin Pan; Chang-Shen Lin; Ying-Chu Lin; Deng-Chyang Wu; Kazunari K Yokoyama
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-29

2.  Targeting hypoxia-induced tumor stemness by activating pathogen-induced stem cell niche defense.

Authors:  Seema Bhuyan; Bidisha Pal; Lekhika Pathak; Partha Jyoti Saikia; Shirsajit Mitra; Sukanya Gayan; Reza Bayat Mokhtari; Hong Li; Chilakamarti V Ramana; Debabrat Baishya; Bikul Das
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.786

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.