Literature DB >> 34724406

Trends in Outpatient Care for Medicare Beneficiaries and Implications for Primary Care, 2000 to 2019.

Michael L Barnett1, Asaf Bitton2, Jeff Souza3, Bruce E Landon4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the central role of primary care in improving health system performance, there are little recent data on how use of primary care and specialists has evolved over time and its implications for the range of care coordination needed in primary care.
OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in outpatient care delivery and the implications for primary care provider (PCP) care coordination.
DESIGN: Descriptive, repeated, cross-sectional study using Medicare claims from 2000 to 2019, with direct standardization used to control for changes in beneficiary characteristics over time.
SETTING: Traditional fee-for-service Medicare. PATIENTS: 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries. MEASUREMENTS: Annual counts of outpatient visits and procedures, the number of distinct physicians seen, and the number of other physicians seen by a PCP's assigned Medicare patients.
RESULTS: The proportion of Medicare beneficiaries with any PCP visit annually only slightly increased from 61.2% in 2000 to 65.7% in 2019. The mean annual number of primary care office visits per beneficiary also changed little from 2000 to 2019 (2.99 to 3.00), although the mean number of PCPs seen increased from 0.89 to 1.21 (36.0% increase). In contrast, the mean annual number of visits to specialists increased 20% from 4.05 to 4.87, whereas the mean number of unique specialists seen increased 34.2% from 1.63 to 2.18. The proportion of beneficiaries seeing 5 or more physicians annually increased from 17.5% to 30.1%. In 2000, a PCP's Medicare patient panel saw a median of 52 other physicians (interquartile range, 23 to 87), increasing to 95 (interquartile range, 40 to 164) in 2019. LIMITATION: Data were limited to Medicare beneficiaries and, because of the use of a 20% sample, may underestimate the number of other physicians seen across a PCP's entire panel.
CONCLUSION: Outpatient care for Medicare beneficiaries has shifted toward more specialist care received from more physicians without increased primary care contact. This represents a substantial expansion of the coordination burden faced by PCPs. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34724406      PMCID: PMC8688292          DOI: 10.7326/M21-1523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   51.598


  37 in total

1.  Patient-Sharing Networks of Physicians and Health Care Utilization and Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Nancy L Keating; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Alan M Zaslavsky; Nicholas A Christakis; A James O'Malley
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Specialization, subspecialization, and subsubspecialization in internal medicine.

Authors:  Christine K Cassel; David B Reuben
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A Step toward Protecting Payments for Primary Care.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  More Sub-Subs Are Coming!

Authors:  James E Dalen; Kenneth J Ryan; Joseph S Alpert
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Can Claims Data Algorithms Identify the Physician of Record?

Authors:  Eva H DuGoff; Emily Walden; Katie Ronk; Mari Palta; Maureen Smith
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Physician patient-sharing networks and the cost and intensity of care in US hospitals.

Authors:  Michael L Barnett; Nicholas A Christakis; James O'Malley; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Nancy L Keating; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Rural And Nonrural Primary Care Physician Practices Increasingly Rely On Nurse Practitioners.

Authors:  Hilary Barnes; Michael R Richards; Matthew D McHugh; Grant Martsolf
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.

Authors:  Irene Papanicolas; Liana R Woskie; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Validity of Race and Ethnicity Codes in Medicare Administrative Data Compared With Gold-standard Self-reported Race Collected During Routine Home Health Care Visits.

Authors:  Olga F Jarrín; Abner N Nyandege; Irina B Grafova; XinQi Dong; Haiqun Lin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.178

10.  The impact of sampling patients on measuring physician patient-sharing networks using Medicare data.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Nancy L Keating; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.