Literature DB >> 34724124

Determining Hospital Volume Threshold for Safety of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Contemporary Cutpoint Analysis.

Patricia C Conroy1, Lucia Calthorpe2, Joseph A Lin1, Sarah Mohamedaly1, Alex Kim3, Kenzo Hirose4, Eric Nakakura4, Carlos Corvera4, Julie Ann Sosa4, Ankit Sarin4, Kimberly S Kirkwood4, Adnan Alseidi4, Mohamed A Adam5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend limiting minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) to high-volume centers. However, the definition of high-volume care remains unclear. We aimed to objectively define a minimum number of MIPD performed annually per hospital associated with improved outcomes in a contemporary patient cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients undergoing MIPD were included from the National Cancer Database (2010-2017). Multivariable modeling with restricted cubic splines was employed to identify an MIPD annual hospital volume threshold associated with lower 90-day mortality. Outcomes were compared between patients treated at low-volume (≤ model-identified cutoff) and high-volume (> cutoff) centers.
RESULTS: Among 3079 patients, 141 (5%) died within 90 days. Median hospital volume was 6 (range 1-73) cases/year. After adjustment, increasing hospital volume was associated with decreasing 90-day mortality for up to 19 (95% CI 16-25) cases/year, indicating a threshold of 20 cases/year. Most cases (82%) were done at low-volume (< 20 cases/year) centers. With adjustment, MIPD at low-volume centers was associated with increased 90-day mortality (OR 2.7; p = 0.002). Length of stay, positive surgical margins, 30-day readmission, and overall survival were similar. On analysis of the most recent two years (n = 1031), patients at low-volume centers (78.2%) were younger and had less advanced tumors but had longer length of stay (8 versus 7 days; p < 0.001) and increased 90-day mortality (7% versus 2%; p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: The cutpoint analysis identified a threshold of at least 20 MIPD cases/year associated with lower postoperative mortality. This threshold should inform national guidelines and institution-level protocols aimed at facilitating the safe implementation of this complex procedure.
© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34724124      PMCID: PMC9289437          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10984-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  27 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Min Wang; Dewei Li; Rufu Chen; Xiaobing Huang; Jing Li; Yahui Liu; Jianhua Liu; Wei Cheng; Xuemin Chen; Wenxing Zhao; Jingdong Li; Zhijian Tan; Heguang Huang; Deyu Li; Feng Zhu; Tingting Qin; Jingdong Ma; Guangsheng Yu; Baoyong Zhou; Shangyou Zheng; Yichen Tang; Wei Han; Lingyu Meng; Jianji Ke; Feng Feng; Botao Chen; Xinmin Yin; Weibo Chen; Hongqin Ma; Jian Xu; Yifeng Liu; Ronggui Lin; Yadong Dong; Yahong Yu; Jun Liu; Hang Zhang; Renyi Qin
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-04-27

2.  Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Approach for Pancreatoduodenectomy: The PADULAP Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ignasi Poves; Fernando Burdío; Olga Morató; Mar Iglesias; Aleksander Radosevic; Lucas Ilzarbe; Laura Visa; Luís Grande
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Defining the learning curve for team-based laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Daniel P Nussbaum; Rebekah R White; Sabino Zani; Paul J Mosca; Dan G Blazer; Bryan M Clary; Theodore N Pappas; Douglas S Tyler; Alexander Perez
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  High-Volume Hospitals with High-Volume and Low-Volume Surgeons: Is There a "Field Effect" for Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Thomas W Wood; Sharona B Ross; Ty A Bowman; Amanda Smart; Carrie E Ryan; Benjamin Sadowitz; Darrell Downs; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Impact of minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy on use of adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kevin L Anderson; Mohamed A Adam; Samantha Thomas; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Presence and Number of Lymph Node Metastases Are Associated With Compromised Survival for Patients Younger Than Age 45 Years With Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam; John Pura; Paolo Goffredo; Michaela A Dinan; Shelby D Reed; Randall P Scheri; Terry Hyslop; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Is There a Minimum Number of Thyroidectomies a Surgeon Should Perform to Optimize Patient Outcomes?

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam; Samantha Thomas; Linda Youngwirth; Terry Hyslop; Shelby D Reed; Randall P Scheri; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer: Practice Patterns and Short-term Outcomes Among 7061 Patients.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam; Kingshuk Choudhury; Michaela A Dinan; Shelby D Reed; Randall P Scheri; Dan G Blazer; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Quality Comes with the (Anatomic) Territory: Evaluating the Impact of Surgeon Operative Mix on Patient Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Krista Hachey; Ryan Morgan; Amy Rosen; Sowmya R Rao; David McAneny; Jennifer Tseng; Gerard Doherty; Teviah Sachs
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection.

Authors:  Tsafrir Vanounou; Jennifer L Steel; Kevin Tri Nguyen; Allan Tsung; J Wallis Marsh; David A Geller; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  3 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Prognostic Significance of Perineural Invasion in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Te-Wei Lin; Hsin-Chih Yeh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  ASO Author Reflections: An Objective Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Patricia C Conroy; Adnan Alseidi; Mohamed A Adam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  Postoperative Outcomes Analysis After Pancreatic Duct Occlusion: A Safe Option to Treat the Pancreatic Stump After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Low-Volume Centers.

Authors:  Antonio Giuliani; Pasquale Avella; Anna Lucia Segreto; Maria Lucia Izzo; Antonio Buondonno; Mariagrazia Coluzzi; Micaela Cappuccio; Maria Chiara Brunese; Roberto Vaschetti; Andrea Scacchi; Germano Guerra; Bruno Amato; Fulvio Calise; Aldo Rocca
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.