| Literature DB >> 34720757 |
Chen Chen1, Tao Wang1, Mengmei Yang2, Jia Song2, Mengli Huang2, Yuezong Bai2, Hao Su3.
Abstract
Background: Biliary tract cancer is a highly lethal malignancy with poor clinical outcome. Accumulating evidence indicates targeted therapeutics may provide new hope for improving treatment response in BTC, hence better understanding the genomic profile is particularly important. Since tumor tissue may not be available for some patients, a complementary method is urgently needed. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) provides a noninvasive means for detecting genomic alterations, and has been regarded as a promising tool to guide clinical therapies.Entities:
Keywords: biliary tract cancer; circulating tumor DNA; genomic feature; next-generation sequencing; signaling pathway
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34720757 PMCID: PMC8553707 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2021.1609879
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathol Oncol Res ISSN: 1219-4956 Impact factor: 3.201
Characteristics of BTC patients who provided ctDNA or tissue samples.
| Characteristic | ctDNA samples | Tissue samples |
|---|---|---|
| Cases | 154 | 545 |
| Median age, year (range) | 61 (39–93) | 59 (17–81) |
| Sex (male vs. female) | 102 vs. 52 | 306 vs. 239 |
| Subtype (cholangiocarcinoma vs. gallbladder carcinoma vs. other) | 105 vs. 37 vs. 4 | 367 vs. 161 vs. 17 |
| MSAF > 0, n (%) | 146 (94.8%) | 520 (95.4%) |
| Median MSAF | 6.47% (0.1–34.8%) | 19.9% (0.8–35.0%) |
| Average GA/case | 4 | 5 |
MSAF, maximum somatic allele frequency; GA, genomic alteration.
FIGURE 1Association between baseline characteristics and ctDNA alteration in clinical samples. The impact of pathological subtype (A), sex (B), and age (C) on MSAF; the impact of pathological subtype (D), sex (E), and age (F) on TMB; comparison of TMB between patients with LRP1B (G), TP53 (H), ErbB family (I) mutation and wild-type, respectively.
FIGURE 2The mutation landscape of ctDNA samples. Mutations of genes in each sample were seen in the waterfall plot where various colors describing the specific forms of mutations were annotated.
FIGURE 3The mutation landscape of ctDNA in cholangiocarcinoma (A) and gallbladder (B) samples. Mutations of genes in each sample were seen in the waterfall plot where various colors describing the specific forms of mutations were annotated.
FIGURE 4GO Enrichment Analysis of frequently mutated genes categorized by biological process (A), cellular component (B) and molecular function (C). The color represents the adjusted p-value.
FIGURE 5KEGG pathway enrichment dot plot of signaling pathways mapped by frequently mutated genes. The y-axis represents KEGG-enriched terms. The x-axis represents the fold of enrichment. The size of the dot represents the number of genes under a specific term. The color of the dots represents the adjusted p-value.
FIGURE 6Genomic alterations in ctDNA versus in tumor DNA from clinical samples and TCGA database.