| Literature DB >> 34719087 |
Kenny Oberlé1, Agnès Bouju-Albert2, Nicolas Helsens1,2, Gladys Pangga2, Hervé Prevost2, Catherine Magras2, Ségolène Calvez1.
Abstract
AIMS: Study the relationship between antibiotic resistance patterns of Pseudomonas isolated from farmed rainbow trout fillets and farm or transformation process locations. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: antimicrobials; aquaculture; pseudomonads; rainbow trout; resistance
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34719087 PMCID: PMC9299046 DOI: 10.1111/jam.15344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Microbiol ISSN: 1364-5072 Impact factor: 4.059
Antibiotic concentrations (µg ml−1) tested on the 51 isolates of Pseudomonas spp
|
| Highly resistant profile |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxytetracycline | 0.5–64 | 32–512 | 0.25–4 |
| Oxolinic acid | 0.062–8 | 4–128 | 0.016–0.25 |
| Florfenicol | 1–128 | 64–1024 | 0.5–8 |
| Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | 0.5/9.5–64/1216 | 32/608–512/9728 | 0.031/0.594–0.5/9.5 |
| Flumequine | 2–256 | 0.062–1 | |
| Colistin | 1–128 | 64–1024 | 0.125–2 |
| Piperacilline | 8–1,024 | 0.250–4 | |
| Ceftazidime | 4–512 | 0.031–0.5 | |
| Gentamicin | 2–256 | 0.062–1 | |
| Azythromycin | 8–1024 |
FIGURE 1Enumeration of total viable mesophilic aerobic bacteria (log CFU per g) on fish fillets sampled in two farms (A and B) and according to the filleting location (laboratory versus factory). Significant TVMC differences between the farms were tested using a non‐parametric Wilcoxon test (α = 0.05)
Distribution of Pseudomonas isolates from two different farms and filleting locations
| Group affiliation | FARM A ( | FARM B ( | Total (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratory | Factory | Laboratory | Factory | ||
|
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 94.1 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.9 |
|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 |
N, number of isolates.
Distribution of the MICs of 11 antimicrobial drugs for Pseudomonas isolates from two rainbow trout farms and filleting locations
Vertical dark lines: breakpoints used with the following sequence of interpretation: S = susceptible; I = susceptible, increased exposure; R = resistant/NS = non‐susceptible; Vertical white lines: calculated ECOFF values using the ECOFF Finder program with 95% endpoint. Grey areas, range of antimicrobial concentrations used during the tests.
Profiles of the 14 multiple antibiotic resistant isolates within the Pseudomonas population (N = 51) based on both breakpoint and ECOFF values
| Isolate ID | Phylogenetic group affiliation | Multiple resistance patterns | Number of resistance |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| A03RPs3‐08 |
| OTC‐FFC‐TMP/SXT‐CAZ | 4 |
| A12RPs2‐30 |
| OTC‐FFC‐TMP/SXT | 3 |
| A14RPs3‐37 |
| OTC‐FFC‐TMP/SXT | 3 |
|
| |||
| A13FPs3‐75 |
| TMP/SXT‐CAZ | 2 |
|
| |||
| B03RPs3‐86 |
| TMP/SXT‐COL‐CAZ | 3 |
| B04RPs1‐87 |
| COL‐CAZ | 2 |
| B05RPs3‐90 |
| TMP/SXT‐CAZ | 2 |
| B07RPs3‐98 |
| TMP/SXT‐CAZ | 2 |
| B11RPs3‐110 |
| TMP/SXT‐CAZ | 2 |
|
| |||
| B03FPs1‐121 |
| TMP/SXT‐CAZ | 2 |
| B05FPs3‐125 |
| TMP/SXT‐COL | 2 |
| B21FPs3‐128 |
| OTC‐FFC‐TMP/SXT | 3 |
| B26FPs3‐140 |
| OTC‐FFC‐TMP/SXT | 3 |
| B14FPs1‐144 |
| TMP/SXT‐CAZ | 2 |
Abbreviations: CAZ, ceftazidime; COL, colistin; FFC, florfenicol; OTC, oxytetracycline; TMP/SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole association.
To different antibiotic classes.
FIGURE 2Graphical representation of the multiple correspondence analysis. The statistical data analysis by MCA did not show any relationship between the antibiotic resistance profiles of the Pseudomonas strains isolated from two farms (A and B) or according to the sampling location of fish fillets (laboratory or factory). Five active variables (resistance patterns to oxytetracycline, florfenicol, ceftazidime, colistin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and four illustrative variables (farm A, farm B, laboratory, factory) were used. The first and second dimensions represent 62.5% of total inertia