Maggie Banys-Paluchowski1,2, Tanja N Fehm3, Donata Grimm-Glang4, Achim Rody4, Natalia Krawczyk3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany, maggybanys@yahoo.de. 2. Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, maggybanys@yahoo.de. 3. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), blood-based diagnostics have become a major focus of oncological research in the last 2 decades. Detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to improve prognosis assessment and complement standard therapy monitoring tools. SUMMARY: To date, several large analyses have confirmed high CTC counts as an independent prognostic factor. Persistently high CTC numbers during systemic treatment are associated with early progression, but it remains to be clarified which therapeutic options should be offered to such patients since the SWOG 0500 trial failed to show benefit from early switch to another chemotherapy regimen in patients with CTC persistence. In comparison, evidence on the prognostic value of ctDNA is still limited. Most importantly, liquid biopsy-guided treatment interventions have been investigated in several trials. In patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative MBC, CTC-driven therapy choices resulted in similar PFS to physician's choice treatment. Recently, the DETECT III trial has shown that patients with HER2-negative MBC and HER2-positive CTCs may benefit from targeted anti-HER2 treatment with lapatinib. ctDNA-driven therapy selection has already been approved in clinical routine: alpelisib is the first targeted treatment indicated on the basis of a ctDNA test. Key Messages: CTCs and ctDNA predict clinical outcome and have a potential to improve therapy choices in MBC.
BACKGROUND: In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), blood-based diagnostics have become a major focus of oncological research in the last 2 decades. Detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to improve prognosis assessment and complement standard therapy monitoring tools. SUMMARY: To date, several large analyses have confirmed high CTC counts as an independent prognostic factor. Persistently high CTC numbers during systemic treatment are associated with early progression, but it remains to be clarified which therapeutic options should be offered to such patients since the SWOG 0500 trial failed to show benefit from early switch to another chemotherapy regimen in patients with CTC persistence. In comparison, evidence on the prognostic value of ctDNA is still limited. Most importantly, liquid biopsy-guided treatment interventions have been investigated in several trials. In patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative MBC, CTC-driven therapy choices resulted in similar PFS to physician's choice treatment. Recently, the DETECT III trial has shown that patients with HER2-negative MBC and HER2-positive CTCs may benefit from targeted anti-HER2 treatment with lapatinib. ctDNA-driven therapy selection has already been approved in clinical routine: alpelisib is the first targeted treatment indicated on the basis of a ctDNA test. Key Messages: CTCs and ctDNA predict clinical outcome and have a potential to improve therapy choices in MBC.
Authors: Massimo Cristofanilli; Jean-Yves Pierga; James Reuben; Alfred Rademaker; Andrew A Davis; Dieter J Peeters; Tanja Fehm; Franco Nolé; Rafael Gisbert-Criado; Dimitrios Mavroudis; Salvatore Grisanti; Mario Giuliano; Jose A Garcia-Saenz; Justin Stebbing; Carlos Caldas; Paola Gazzaniga; Luis Manso; Rita Zamarchi; Angela Fernandez de Lascoiti; Leticia De Mattos-Arruda; Michail Ignatiadis; Luc Cabel; Steven J van Laere; Franziska Meier-Stiegen; Maria-Teresa Sandri; Jose Vidal-Martinez; Eleni Politaki; Francesca Consoli; Daniele Generali; Maria Rosa Cappelletti; Eduardo Diaz-Rubio; Jonathan Krell; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Cristina Raimondi; Annemie Rutten; Wolfgang Janni; Elisabetta Munzone; Vicente Carañana; Sofia Agelaki; Camillo Almici; Luc Dirix; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Laura Zorzino; Lauren Darrigues; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Lorenzo Gerratana; Stefan Michiels; François-Clément Bidard; Klaus Pantel Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Ben O'Leary; Sarah Hrebien; James P Morden; Matthew Beaney; Charlotte Fribbens; Xin Huang; Yuan Liu; Cynthia Huang Bartlett; Maria Koehler; Massimo Cristofanilli; Isaac Garcia-Murillas; Judith M Bliss; Nicholas C Turner Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: N C Turner; E Alarcón; A C Armstrong; M Philco; Y A López Chuken; M-P Sablin; K Tamura; A Gómez Villanueva; J A Pérez-Fidalgo; S Y A Cheung; C Corcoran; M Cullberg; B R Davies; E C de Bruin; A Foxley; J P O Lindemann; R Maudsley; M Moschetta; E Outhwaite; M Pass; P Rugman; G Schiavon; M Oliveira Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: S Hrebien; V Citi; I Garcia-Murillas; R Cutts; K Fenwick; I Kozarewa; R McEwen; J Ratnayake; R Maudsley; T H Carr; E C de Bruin; G Schiavon; M Oliveira; N Turner Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jacqueline A Shaw; David S Guttery; Allison Hills; Daniel Fernandez-Garcia; Karen Page; Brenda M Rosales; Kate S Goddard; Robert K Hastings; Jinli Luo; Olivia Ogle; Laura Woodley; Simak Ali; Justin Stebbing; R Charles Coombes Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: F André; E M Ciruelos; D Juric; S Loibl; M Campone; I A Mayer; G Rubovszky; T Yamashita; B Kaufman; Y-S Lu; K Inoue; Z Pápai; M Takahashi; F Ghaznawi; D Mills; M Kaper; M Miller; P F Conte; H Iwata; H S Rugo Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jeffrey B Smerage; William E Barlow; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Eric P Winer; Brian Leyland-Jones; Gordan Srkalovic; Sheela Tejwani; Anne F Schott; Mark A O'Rourke; Danika L Lew; Gerald V Doyle; Julie R Gralow; Robert B Livingston; Daniel F Hayes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 50.717