| Literature DB >> 34717229 |
Rahul Singh1, Vijay Kumar Bhardwaj2, Rituraj Purohit3.
Abstract
The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently, there are no particular antivirals available to battle with COVID-19. The RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) has emerged as a novel drug target due to its essential role in virus replication. In this study, turmeric-derived compounds were chosen and subjected to in-silico analysis to evaluate their binding affinity against the RdRp-RNA complex of SARS-CoV-2. Our in-silico approach included the analysis of protein-ligand interactions by molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations, followed by free energy calculations by molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area analysis. Curcumin and diacetylcurcumin showed stability and good binding affinity at the active site of the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp-RNA complex. Furthermore, to validate the potency of selected compounds, we compared them with Favipiravir and Remdesivir antiviral drugs from our previous analysis on targeting tea bioactive molecules to inhibit RdRp-RNA complex. The comparative analysis revealed that the selected compounds showed higher potential to be developed as RdRp-RNA inhibitors than antiviral medicines Remdesivir and Favipiravir. However, these compounds need to be further validated by in-vitro and in-vivo investigations.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Curcumin; Diacetylcurcumin; MM-PBSA; RdRp-RNA; SARS‐CoV‐2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34717229 PMCID: PMC8532373 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104965
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Biol Med ISSN: 0010-4825 Impact factor: 4.589
The docking scores in terms of -CDOCKER interaction energy (kcal/mol) for the selected turmeric-derived compounds.
| S. No. | Molecules | -CDOCKER interaction energy (kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|
| Diacetylcurcumin | 69.54 | |
| Curcumin | 64.10 | |
| Tetrahydrocurcumin | 62.1 | |
| Dimethylcurcumin | 58.99 | |
| Demethoxycurcumin | 52.95 | |
| Bis-demethoxycurcumin | 51.15 |
Fig. 1The 2D interaction poses of (a) curcumin and (b) diacetylcurcumin docked on the active site of RdRp-RNA complex of SARS-CoV-2.
Fig. 2Backbone RMSDs are shown as a function of time for the RdRp-RNA of SARS-CoV-2 and compounds.
Fig. 3RMSF for the backbone C-α-atoms of RdRp-RNA complexes with curcumin (green) and diacetylcurcumin (red).
Binding free energy in individual terms for both compounds bound to RdRp-RNA generated by MM-PBSA method.
| S. No. | RdRp-RNA-Ligand Complexes | ΔE binding(kJ/mol) | ΔE polar solvation(kJ/mol) | SASA (kJ/mol) | ΔE Electrostatic (kJ/mol) | ΔE Van der Waals (kJ/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | RdRp-curcumin | −42.162 | 101.798 | −13.496 | −18.137 | −112.327 |
| 2. | RdRp-diacetylcurcumin | −71.964 | 116.315 | −19.107 | −14.698 | −154.474 |
| 3. | RNA-curcumin | −40.306 | 27.351 | −6.539 | −11.487 | −49.631 |
| 4. | RNA-diacetylcurcumin | −80.718 | 31.556 | −8.498 | −31.535 | −72.242 |
Fig. 4The graphical representation of binding free energy estimated for the entire simulation for curcumin (green) and diacetylcurcumin (red) with (a) RdRp protein and (b) RNA respectively.