| Literature DB >> 34714545 |
Guowu Gan1,2, Beibei Lu1,2, Ren Zhang1,2, Yufang Luo1,2, Shuai Chen1,2, Huaxiang Lei1,2, Yijun Li1,2, Zhiyu Cai3, Xiaojing Huang1,2.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the impact of chronic apical periodontitis (CAP) on atherosclerosis and gut microbiota by establishing a Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis)-induced CAP in an apolipoprotein E-deficient (apoE-/- ) mice model.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Porphyromonas gingivaliszzm321990; animal model; atherosclerosis; chronic apical periodontitis; gut microbiota
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34714545 PMCID: PMC9298730 DOI: 10.1111/iej.13655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Endod J ISSN: 0143-2885 Impact factor: 5.165
FIGURE 1The left maxillary first and second molars in the CAP group under stereomicroscope (a) and micro‐CT (b) (scale bar: 500 μm). The white arrow indicates the pulp exposure site. No significant difference was observed in the body weight at different time points between CAP and control group (c). (p > .05).
FIGURE 2Sagittal sections of the micro‐CT images of the left maxillary first and second molars in the CAP (a) and control (b) groups (scale bar: 500 μm). The white triangle indicates periapical lesions (PALs).
FIGURE 3P. gingivalis induced CAP increased plaque formation in the aortic arch. Oil Red O‐stained aortic arches from mice in the CAP (a) and the control (b) group (scale bar: 1 mm). A significantly higher percentage of Oil Red O‐stained area of aortic arches was observed in the CAP group than the control group (n = 14 in each group) (c). (** means p < .01).
FIGURE 4No significant difference was found in serum levels of either HDL‐C (a), LDL‐C (b), TC (c), or TG (d) between CAP and control group (n = 8 in each group). (* means p < .05).
FIGURE 5Comparison of the gut microbiota between CAP and control group by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The bar chart shows the percentage of the top 20 most abundant gut microbiota in the two groups of mice (a). Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) method was performed to compare taxa between the CAP and control groups (b). The bar plot lists the significantly different taxa (p < .05) based on effect size (LDA score (log 10) > ± 2).
FIGURE 6Data analysis of the diversity and distribution of gut microbiota in apoE−/− mice after dental infection with P. gingivalis. Alpha diversity was measured by Faith's phylogenetic diversity (a), Shannon index (b), and Simpson index (c). (** means p < .01) CAP group (red dots) and control group (blue dots) samples are each combined into a cluster in principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of Bray‐Curtis distance between sample diversity (p = .003) (d). The significant difference was found in Spearman's rank correlation between CAP and control groups using mouse body weight and percentage of aortic arch lesion area as environmental factors at the phylum level in the heatmap of co‐occurrence analysis (e). (p < .05).