Literature DB >> 34712736

Genetic Diversity of Shanlan Upland Rice (Oryza sativa L.) and Association Analysis of SSR Markers Linked to Agronomic Traits.

Guofeng Yang1, Yong Yang1, Yali Guan1, Zhixia Xu1, Junyu Wang1, Yong Yun2, Xiaowei Yan2, Qingjie Tang2.   

Abstract

Shanlan upland rice, a kind of unique rice germplasm in Hainan Island, was used to evaluate genetic diversity and association between SSR markers and agronomic traits. A total of 239 alleles were detected in 57 Hainan upland rice varieties using 35 SSR markers, and the number of alleles per locus was 2-19. The observed heterozygosity was 0.0655-0.3115. The Shannon diversity index was 0.1352-0.4827. The genetic similarity coefficient was 0.6736-0.9707, and 46 varieties were clustered into one group, indicating that the genetic base of the Shanlan upland rice germplasm was narrow. A total of 25 SSR markers significantly related to plant height, effective panicle number per plant, panicle length, total grain number, filled grain number, seed rating rate, and 1000-grain weight were obtained (P < 0.01), with the percentage of the total variations explained ranging from 0.12% to 42.62%. RM208 explained 42.62% of the total variations in plant height of Shanlan upland rice. RM493 was significantly associated with 6 agronomic traits. We can speculate that RM208 may flank QTLs responsible for plant height and RM493 may flank QTLs playing a fundamental role in the intertwined regulatory network of agronomic traits of Shanlan upland rice.
Copyright © 2021 Guofeng Yang et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34712736      PMCID: PMC8548095          DOI: 10.1155/2021/7588652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


1. Introduction

Shanlan upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a type of landrace adapted to the tropical dryland climate, with strong drought resistance and good taste quality [1-3], distributed in the central and western regions of Hainan Island where Li and Miao people live. Shanlan liquor made from Shanlan glutinous rice is known as “Moutai of Li people” and well received by local people. In our previous study, the coefficients of variation of the agronomic traits including plant height, panicle length, seed setting rate, and 1000-grain weight were all more than 10%, and the coefficients of variation of the traits including effective panicle number per plant, total number of grains, and number of filled grains reached about 30%, indicating that the Shanlan upland rice germplasm has a relatively rich diversity of agronomic traits. Many excellent Shanlan upland rice varieties were found out, including 7 varieties with panicle length exceeding 30.0 cm, 3 varieties with total number of grains being more than 200.0, 10 varieties with seed setting rate exceeding 90.0%, and 23 varieties with 1000-grain weight being more than 30.0 g, which would provide excellent genetic resources for the high-yield breeding of rice [4]. Based on linkage disequilibrium (LD), the association between target traits and genetic markers or candidate gene mutations in the natural population can be identified. It is widely used in association analysis between molecular and phenotypic variation, and discovery, location, and functional analysis of genes of interest [5-7]. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) is composed of a set of 1 to 6 base sequences (motif) repeated in tandem, with high polymorphism, abundant quantity, good repeatability, and codominance [8, 9]. The Gramene website (http://www.gramene.org) has published more than 19,000 SSR markers in rice, which are commonly used in rice genetic diversity studies, germplasm evaluation, genetic map construction, target trait gene location, and cloning. In previous studies, only few Shanlan upland rice varieties were used in the analyses of the genetic diversity [1, 10]. No report on association analysis between SSR markers and agronomic traits of the Shanlan upland rice germplasm was found. The objectives of this present study were to use 57 Shanlan upland rice varieties to evaluate genetic diversity and analyze association between SSR markers and agronomic traits.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Experimental Site

A collection consisting of 57 Shanlan upland rice accessions was used in this study, which including landraces and other breeding varieties collected from the central and western regions of Hainan Island during 2013–2017 (see Table 1). From 2015 to 2017, all accessions were grown in the Yongfa Base of Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Chengmai County, Hainan Province, and Tropical Crop Field in Yinggen Town, Qiongzhong County, Hainan Province, and were planted around the Dragon Boat Festival in a direct-seeding way, with shallow soil cover. 100 plants of each accession were planted with 25 cm of row spacing and 30 cm of plant spacing. The conventional management of upland rice planting was performed.
Table 1

Source and subspecies of 57 Shanlan upland rice accessions.

No.SourceSubspeciesNo.SourceSubspecies
M1Qiongzhong County Japonica M30Qiongzhong County Indica
M2Qiongzhong County Japonica M31Qiongzhong County Indica
M3Baisha County Japonica M32Qiongzhong County Japonica
M4Qiongzhong County Japonica M33Qiongzhong County Indica
M5Baisha County Indica M34Qiongzhong County Indica
M6Baisha County Japonica M35Wuzhishan City Japonica
M7Qiongzhong County Japonica M36Wuzhishan City Japonica
M8Qiongzhong County Indica M37Wuzhishan City Japonica
M9Qiongzhong County Japonica M38Ledong County Japonica
M10Qiongzhong County Indica M39Ledong County Japonica
M11Qiongzhong County Indica M40Ledong County Japonica
M12Qiongzhong County Indica M41Ledong County Indica
M13Qiongzhong County Japonica M42Ledong County Japonica
M14Qiongzhong County Indica M43Ledong County Japonica
M15Qiongzhong County Japonica M44Ledong County Japonica
M16Qiongzhong County Japonica M45Dongfang City Indica
M17Qiongzhong County Indica M46Dongfang City Indica
M18Baisha County Indica M47Dongfang City Indica
M19Qiongzhong County Japonica M48Dongfang City Indica
M20Qiongzhong County Japonica M49Dongfang City Indica
M21Qiongzhong County Japonica M50Dongfang City Indica
M22Baisha County Japonica M51Dongfang City Indica
M23Qiongzhong County Japonica M52Dongfang city Indica
M24Qiongzhong County Japonica M53Baoting County Japonica
M25Ledong County Japonica M54Baoting County Japonica
M26Ledong County Japonica M55Baoting County Japonica
M27Baisha County Indica M56Ledong County Japonica
M28Baisha County Indica M57Ledong County Japonica
M29Qiongzhong County Indica

2.2. Agronomic and Molecular Methods in the Study

Ten plants were selected at random from each accession and evaluated for 7 agronomic traits including plant height, effective panicle number per plant, panicle length, total number of grains per panicle, number of filled grains per panicle, seed setting rate, and 1000-grain weight. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SPSS 19.0 software. A total of 48 SSR markers distributed on 12 chromosomes of rice were used to survey the Shanlan upland rice germplasm for genetic diversity (see Table 2). The forward fluorescent primers of SSR markers were filled with FAM (blue) fluorescent dye, and synthesized by the BGI (Guangzhou) Company. The reverse nonfluorescent primers were synthesized by the Shenggong (Shanghai) Company.
Table 2

SSR markers used in study.

No.SSR markerSequence (5′ to 3′)Annealing temperature (°C)Size of common polymorphic fragments (bp)
1RM583Forward: agatccatccctgtggagagReverse: gcgaactcgcgttgtaatc55179, 189, 192, 195, 198
2RM7lForward: ctagaggcgaaaacgagatgReverse: gggtgggcgaggtaataatg55121, 139, 148, 213
3RM85Forward: ccaaagatgaaacctggattgReverse: gcacaaggtgagcagtcc5579, 94, 100, 103
4RM471Forward: acgcacaagcagatgatgagReverse: gggagaagacgaatgtttgc55104, 106, 114
5RM274Forward: cctcgcttatgagagcttcgReverse: cttctccatcactcccatgg55149, 161
6RM190Forward: ctttgtctatctcaagacacReverse: ttgcagatgttcttcctgatg55107, 119, 121
7RM336Forward: cttacagagaaacggcatcgReverse: gctggtttgtttcaggttcg55141, 144, 151, 154, 160, 163, 165, 192
8RM72Forward: ccggcgataaaacaatgagReverse: gcatcggtcctaactaaggg55149, 159, 162, 165
9RM2l9Forward: cgtcggatgatgtaaagcctReverse: catatcggcattcgcctg55194, 196, 215, 221
10RM311Forward: tggtagtataggtactaaacatReverse: tcctatacacatacaaacatac55160, 166, 170, 182
11RM209Forward: atatgagttgctgtcgtgcgReverse: caacttgcatcctcccctcc55125, 132, 151, 153, 160
12RM19Forward: caaaaacagagcagatgacReverse: ctcaagatggacgccaaga55216, 247, 250, 253
13RM1195Forward: atggaccacaaacgaccttcReverse: cgactcccttgttcttctgg55142, 144, 146, 148, 150, 152
14RM208Forward: tctgcaagccttgtctgatgReverse: taagtcgatcattgtgtggacc55162, 164, 172, 176, 178
15RM232Forward: ccggtatccttcgatattgcReverse: ccgacttltcctcclgacg55141, 150, 156, 159, 161
16RM119Forward: catccccctgctgctgctgctgReverse: cgccggatgtgtgggactagcg67166, 169
17RM267Forward: tgcagacatagagaaggaagtgReverse: agcaacagcacaacttgatg55136, 138, 153, 155
18RM253Forward: tccttcaagagtgcaaaaccReverse: gcattgtcatgtcgaagcc55213, 245
19RM481Forward: tagctagccgattgaatggcReverse: ctccacctcctatgttgttg55135, 138, 141, 144, 147, 177, 188
20RM339Forward: gtaatcgatgctgtgggaagReverse: gagtcatgtgatagccgatatg55140, 146, 158
21RM278Forward: gtagtgagcctaacaataatcReverse: tcaactcagcatctctgtcc5559, 139, 141, 143
22RM258Forward: tgctgtatgtagctcgcaccReverse: tggcctttaaagctgtcgc55128, 132, 136, 146
23RM224Forward: atcgatcgatcttcacgaggReverse: tgctataaaaggcattcggg55120, 128, 131, 143, 153, 155, 157
24RM17Forward: tgccctgttattttcttctctcReverse: ggtgatcctttcccatttca55153, 158, 182, 184
25RM493Forward: tagctccaacaggatcgaccReverse: gtacgtaaacgcggaaggtg55221, 236, 245
26RM561Forward: gagctgttttggactacggcReverse: gagtagctttctcccacccc5560, 185, 187, 193, 268, 270
27RM8277Forward: agcacaagtaggtgcatttcReverse: atttgcctgtgatgtaatagc55165, 187, 190, 193, 196
28RM551Forward: agcccagactagcatgattgReverse: gaaggcgagaaggatcacag55182, 184, 186, 188, 192, 194, 196
29RM598Forward: gaatcgcacacgtgatgaacReverse: atgcgactgatcggtactcc55153, 156, 162
30RMl76Forward: cggctcccgctacgacgtctccReverse: agcgatgcgctggaagaggtgc67133, 136
31RM432Forward: ttctgtctcacgctggattgReverse: agctgcgtacgtgatgaatg55166, 178, 186
32RM331Forward: gaaccagaggacaaaaatgcReverse: catcatacatttgcagccag5563, 92, 150, 152, 158, 172
33OSR28Forward: agcagctatagcttagctggReverse: actgcacatgagcagagaca55136, 174, 177, 180, 183
34RM590Forward: catctccgctctccatgcReverse: ggagttggggtcttgttcg55136, 143
35RM21Forward: acagtattccgtaggcacggReverse: gctccatgagggtggtagag55128, 132, 147, 158, 160
36RM3331Forward: cctcctccatgagctaatgcReverse: aggaggagcggatttctctc50110, 122, 124, 126
37RM443Forward: gatggttttcatcggctacgReverse: agtcccagaatgtcgtttcg55115, 119, 121, 123
38RM490Forward: atctgcacactgcaaacaccReverse: agcaagcagtgctttcagag5593, 99, 103
39RM424Forward: tttgtggctcaccagttgagReverse: tggcgcattcatgtcatc55240, 277, 280
40RM423Forward: agcacccatgccttatgttgReverse: cctttttcagtagccctccc55269, 286, 293, 299
41RM571Forward: ggaggtgaaagcgaatcatgReverse: cctgctgctctttcatcagc5554, 180, 189, 191
42RM231Forward: ccagattatttcctgaggtcReverse: cacttgcatagttctgcattg55178, 180, 182, 184, 186, 188
43RM567Forward: atcagggaaatcctgaagggReverse: ggaaggagcaatcaccactg55244, 246, 248, 250, 252
44RM289Forward: ttccatggcacacaagccReverse: ctgtgcacgaacttccaaag5587, 106
45RM542Forward: tgaatcaagcccctcactacReverse: ctgcaacgagtaaggcagag5587, 89, 111
46RM316Forward: ctagttgggcatacgatggcReverse: acgcttatatgttacgtcaac55165, 182, 184, 186, 196, 198, 200, 213
47RM332Forward: gcgaaggcgaaggtgaagReverse: catgagtgatctcactcaccc55164, 167, 169, 176
48RM7102Forward: taggagtgtttagagtgccaReverse: tcggtttgcttatacatcag55170, 175, 187
Using the Plant Genomic DNA Rapid Extraction Kit produced by the Shenggong (Shanghai) Company, the genomic DNA was extracted from 50 to 100 mg of the fresh tender leaves collected and sampled from individual plants of the accessions at the seedling stage as a template. The PCR reactions were carried out in a reaction solution of 10 μL containing 1 μL of the template DNA (50~100 ng), 0.2 μL of each primer (10 μmol/L), 5 μL of the 2x EasyTaq® PCR SuperMix produced by TransGen Biotech Company, and 3.6 μL of ddH2O. The PCR amplification reactions were performed at the following cycle profile: initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, 30 cycles of 45 s denaturation at 94°C, 45 s annealing at 50~67°C, 1 min extension at 72°C, followed by 8 min at 72°C for the final extension. The amplified products were submitted to the BGI (Wuhan) Company for capillary electrophoresis by the ABI 3730xl Genetic Analyzer, and the original data was collected using Data Collection software. A 1/0 matrix was constructed based on the presence and absence of alleles. The presence was denoted as 1 and absence as 0. The genetic diversity parameters such as number of alleles per locus, observed heterozygosity (Ho), and Shannon's diversity index (I) were estimated using the program Popgene 1.32. The genetic similarity coefficients among the accessions were calculated using NTSYS 2.1 software. The cluster analysis was carried out usying the UPGMA and SHAN methods. The population structure was estimated using Structure 2.2 software. Association analyses were carried out using Tassel 2.1 software. The maximum of L(K) was identified as the optimum number of the subpopulation, and the structure matrix (Q) was extracted from the membership probability of each genotype for the mixed linear model (MLM) analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Genetic Diversity Analysis

35 polymorphic SSR markers selected from a total of 48 SSR markers were used to screen 57 Shanlan upland rice accessions. As shown in Table 3, a total of 239 alleles were detected. A couple of allele report images are shown in Figure 1. The number of alleles per locus varied from 2 to 19 with an average of 6.8. The observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.0655 to 0.3115 with an average of 0.1702. The Shannon diversity index ranged from 0.1352 to 0.4827 with an average of 0.2826.
Table 3

Genetic diversity parameters of SSR loci used for genotyping in Shanlan upland rice accessions.

No.SSR lociNumber of allelesObserved heterozygosityShannon's diversity index
1RM5835.00.18550.3234
2RM4907.00.13780.2304
3RM4434.00.31150.4827
4RM4938.00.10320.1793
5RM4246.00.12700.2177
6RM4235.00.19990.3399
7RM5617.00.21340.3524
8RM20811.00.08470.1554
9RM715.00.16290.2699
10RM2317.00.20150.3357
11RM5716.00.22690.3582
12RM82776.00.16830.2887
13RM854.00.18840.3094
14RM5679.00.14610.2425
15RM55110.00.14090.2473
16RM4713.00.26880.4192
17RM2742.00.29480.4573
18RM2675.00.19440.3270
19RM1905.00.18450.2956
20RM2535.00.15840.2498
21RM4324.00.20040.3204
22RM48119.00.06550.1352
23RM33613.00.07970.1608
24RM3317.00.18890.3235
25RM725.00.18670.3151
26RM31610.00.20730.3366
27OSR288.00.12310.2174
28RM2786.00.25050.3817
29RM2197.00.13220.2273
30RM5905.00.14820.2430
31RM3326.00.14480.2467
32RM2110.00.09350.1681
33RM71025.00.16440.2708
34RM33318.00.11910.2088
35RM176.00.15400.2550
Mean6.80.17020.2826
Figure 1

Allele report based on capillary electrophoresis. (a) SSR marker RM85 was used to survey Shanlan upland rice accession M36. Two alleles were detected and denoted as 79 and 103. (b) SSR marker RM336 was used to survey Shanlan upland rice accession M31. Two alleles were detected and denoted as 125 and 154.

3.2. Genetic Similarity Coefficient and Cluster Analysis

The genetic similarity coefficients of 57 Shanlan upland rice accessions ranged from 0.6736 to 0.9707 with an average of 0.7889. The dendrogram resulting from the distance-based analysis of 57 accessions with Jaccard's genetic distance is shown in Figure 2. 57 accessions were classified into 3 clades with a genetic similarity coefficient of 0.75. Clade 1 included 46 accessions, such as M1, M3, and M6, which were classified into 6 subclades. The accession M31 constituted Clade 2 alone. Clade 3 included 10 accessions, such as M5, M7, and M53.
Figure 2

Neighbor-joining cluster analysis for Shanlan upland rice accessions. Subclade 1A: M1, M3, M6, M19, M26, M34, M25, and M32. Subclade 1B: M2, M21, M4, M14, M23, M24, M35, and M39. Subclade 1C: M8, M10, M11, M17, M29, M16, M9, M13, M27, M28, M41, M42, M44, M15, M22, M12, M33, M18, and M20. Subclade 1D: M30 and M43. Subclade 1E: M38. Subclade 1F: M36, M37, M57, M40, M50, M51, M49, and M56. Clade 2: M31. Clade 3: M5, M7, M53, M54, M46, M47, M45, M55, M48, and M52.

3.3. Population Structure Analysis

The likelihood value of this analysis is shown in Figure 3. The likelihood was maximum at 2 of K value and then decreased, after which it became almost constant. Therefore, the structure results of K = 2 were considered the best possible partition. Using Structure 2.2 software, the posterior probability of each accession was calculated, and 57 Shanlan upland rice accessions were divided into 2 subpopulations. The population structure diagram is shown in Figure 4. Subpopulation 1 included 37 accessions: M1, M2, M3, M4, M6, M8, M9, M10, M11, M12, M13, M14, M15, M16, M17, M18, M19, M20, M21, M22, M23, M24, M25, M26, M27, M28, M29, M30, M32, M33, M34, M35, M39, M41, M42, M43, and M44. Subpopulation 2 included 20 accessions: M5, M7, M31, M36, M37, M38, M40, M45, M46, M47, M48, M49, M50, M51, M52, M53, M54, M55, M56, and M57.
Figure 3

Estimation of population in Shanlan upland rice accessions.

Figure 4

Population structure of Shanlan upland rice accessions.

Comparing the results of population structure analysis with cluster analysis, it was found that the accessions contained in Subpopulation 1 were consistent with those contained in Subclade 1A, Subclade 1B, Subclade 1C, and Subclade 1D. Subclade 1E, Subclade 1F, Clade 2, and Clade 3 belonged to Subpopulation 2.

3.4. Association Analysis

The details of the agronomic traits of 57 Shanlan upland rice accessions are shown in Table 4. The analysis of variance revealed significant differences (P < 0.05) among 57 accessions for 7 agronomic traits, respectively.
Table 4

Details of agronomic traits of Shanlan upland rice accessions.

No.PH (cm)PNPL (cm)TGFGSR (%)TW (g)
M1134.89.524.591.978.985.930.8
M2147.88.425.694.685.790.627.5
M3147.06.728.0146.1122.984.130.2
M4154.08.226.3126.4116.692.229.0
M5152.09.126.6103.192.289.430.6
M6136.28.425.9102.587.985.830.3
M7141.810.225.390.076.585.031.9
M8156.612.628.3103.585.983.033.2
M9136.58.326.9112.499.188.234.5
M10148.79.725.887.369.479.528.2
M11168.39.029.7144.4131.090.727.2
M12164.011.726.3137.0121.888.931.4
M13170.712.024.385.678.491.625.2
M14175.011.025.9104.384.681.128.7
M15169.79.827.4104.096.092.332.1
M16156.310.329.4140.9105.975.230.6
M17160.08.124.9102.883.681.327.8
M18137.36.029.095.261.064.124.2
M19154.38.024.6104.093.690.029.0
M20159.78.028.6108.695.487.827.4
M21160.79.023.294.279.284.127.0
M22144.37.026.6133.0104.478.528.0
M23146.710.028.8112.475.266.930.4
M24151.08.029.0115.297.284.429.0
M25148.36.033.2153.6102.866.928.9
M26152.77.030.2124.075.460.829.0
M27158.711.027.0113.882.472.425.6
M28160.79.027.8131.070.053.428.0
M29139.09.028.299.286.887.531.4
M30155.77.027.2195.8131.467.124.2
M31158.313.029.4151.6125.682.826.2
M32162.711.027.4118.892.677.930.0
M33152.77.026.299.671.471.726.4
M34162.011.029.2144.6129.889.825.8
M35157.88.027.4118.2113.095.625.4
M36135.814.028.3196.0162.082.717.7
M37159.26.029.4163.278.247.924.0
M38143.27.028.7170.6107.062.730.6
M39157.24.026.4124.5113.391.020.5
M40153.15.031.4189.2166.487.923.6
M41142.16.026.0107.790.083.632.0
M42156.15.027.3174.8151.286.531.4
M43139.24.032.0243.0115.047.331.4
M44149.55.024.8141.8101.471.530.4
M45132.06.024.8119.760.550.622.0
M46145.05.026.5184.2148.280.534.8
M47167.110.029.5177.2161.291.029.0
M48139.29.029.3180.0157.487.431.2
M49133.58.023.1239.6226.094.323.1
M50157.56.031.3182.7111.360.933.5
M51133.08.022.9150.3129.486.122.8
M52147.54.034.1188.5107.056.824.0
M5399.210.021.0164.8123.374.823.3
M54123.07.025.1205.9153.374.523.2
M55173.511.025.8128.395.174.136.1
M5686.35.019.084.267.680.321.0
M57100.03.019.662.454.887.823.1
P 0.0000.0460.0000.0000.0000.0000.000

PH: plant height; PN: effective panicle number per plant; PL: panicle length; TG: total number of grains; FG: number of filled grains; SR: seed setting rate; TW: 1000-grain weight; P: levels of probability for significant differences between data within each column.

A total of 25 SSR markers significantly associated with agronomic traits such as plant height, effective panicle number per plant, panicle length, total grain number, filled grain number, seed setting rate, and 1000-grain weight were detected, with the percentage of total variations explained ranging from 0.12% to 42.62% (P < 0.01) (see Table 5). Of them, RM208 explained 42.62% of total variations in plant height of Shanlan upland rice. The locations of the associated SSR markers on 12 chromosomes of rice are shown in Figure 5 according to Cornell SSR 2001 (https://archive.gramene.org/). The SSR markers significantly associated with each agronomic trait of the Shanlan upland rice germplasm were all distributed on multiple chromosomes. There were many SSR markers significantly linked to 2 or more agronomic traits, respectively. For example, 8 markers were significantly associated with 2 traits, 3 markers with 3 traits, and 3 markers with 4 traits. In particular, RM493 was significantly associated with 6 traits.
Table 5

Percentage of total variations explained by SSR markers linked to agronomic traits of Shanlan upland rice accessions (%).

No.SSR markerAgronomic traits
PHPNPLTGFGSRTW
1OSR2817.9312.45
2RM1710.2011.4024.11
3RM1909.5010.42
4RM20842.6220.6310.26
5RM2110.2816.5623.19
6RM21910.3112.71
7RM25317.9312.4518.0912.88
8RM2679.71
9RM27811.59
10RM33110.43
11RM33212.3622.52
12RM33319.54
13RM33614.43
14RM42315.81
15RM42410.31
16RM48128.6712.4319.1613.55
17RM49311.9711.7413.2215.1014.2119.64
18RM56717.9312.4511.9524.61
19RM57120.66
20RM5830.12
21RM59014.8016.98
22RM7117.9312.45
23RM710211.59
24RM7212.6614.27
25RM8524.189.44

PH: plant height; PN: effective panicle number per plant; PL: panicle length; TG: total number of grains; FG: number of filled grains; SR: seed setting rate; TW: 1000-grain weight.

Figure 5

Map locations of the SSR markers linked to agronomic traits of Shanlan upland rice accessions. PH: plant height. PN: effective panicle number per plant. PL: panicle length. TG: total number of grains. FG: number of filled grains. SR: seed setting rate. TW: 1000-grain weight.

4. Discussion

Shanlan upland rice is a kind of unique rice germplasm in Hainan Island. So, it is essential to analyze its genetic diversity and explore its application in rice breeding. Through the sequence analysis of SSII, ITS, Ehd1, ndhC-trnV, and cox3 genes, Yuan et al. have found that the genetic diversity of 14 Shanlan upland rice varieties was lower than that of Asian cultivated rice and the common wild rice [1]. Wang et al. have analyzed the genetic diversity of 23 Shanlan upland rice varieties using 22 RAPD primers and found that the genetic similarity coefficients ranged from 0.881 to 0.952 [10]. In this study, a total of 239 alleles were detected in 57 Hainan upland rice varieties using 35 SSR markers, and the number of alleles per locus varied from 2 to 19 with an average of 6.8. The genetic similarity coefficient of 57 Shanlan upland rice varieties ranged from 0.6736 to 0.9707 with an average of 0.7889, and 46 varieties were clustered into one group, indicating that the genetic base of the Shanlan upland rice germplasm is narrow, which is similar to the results of previous studies [1, 10]. The low genetic diversity of the Shanlan upland rice germplasm may be caused by factors such as the relatively single geographic origin and the long-term continuous selection of Li and Miao people. In this study, 57 accessions were classified into 3 clades, and Clade 1 was further classified into 6 subclades through cluster analysis. Through population structure analysis, 57 accessions were divided into 2 subpopulations. Subclade 1A, Subclade 1B, Subclade 1C, and Subclade 1D belonged to Subpopulation 1. Subclade 1E, Subclade 1F, Clade 2, and Clade 3 belonged to Subpopulation 2. Subclade 1A included 8 accessions, all of which belonged to the japonica subspecies except for M34. Subclade 1B included 8 accessions, all of which belonged to the japonica subspecies except for M14. Subclade 1C included 19 accessions, of which 8 accessions belonged to the japonica subspecies and 11 accessions belonged to the indica subspecies. Subclade 1D included 2 accessions, one of which belonged to the japonica subspecies and the other belonged to the indica subspecies. Subclade 1E included 1 accession, which belonged to the japonica subspecies. Subclade 1F included 8 accessions, of which 5 accessions belonged to the japonica subspecies and 3 accessions belonged to the indica subspecies. Clade 2 included 1 accession, which belonged to the indica subspecies. Clade 3 included 10 accessions, of which 4 accessions belonged to the japonica subspecies and 6 accessions belonged to the indica subspecies. Most of the accessions of some subclades belonged to the japonica subspecies. However, the indica subspecies and the japonica subspecies were mixed in most clades and subclades. From the perspective of geographic origin, clades and subclades were not concentratedly distributed, and the difference in their geographic origin was not obvious. Zheng et al. have used five indicators such as glume hair, grain phenol reaction, 1 to 2 internode length below the spike, grain length/width ratio, and chaff color at heading to detect the species margin of Shanlan upland rice accessions and found that most of the accessions belong to the japonica subspecies [11]. We can speculate that the subspecies structure of Shanlan upland rice has changed in the past two decades, and the proportion of the indica subspecies has increased. The area of Hainan Island is not large, and the geographical and climatic conditions, such as altitude, temperature, and sunshine, are very similar in the areas where Shanlan upland rice is cultivated. In addition, the frequent exchanges between the Li and Miao ethnic groups have made the geographical boundaries of different Shanlan upland rice accessions increasingly blurred. Rice agronomic traits are mostly quantitative traits, controlled by multiple genes. Known rice plant height QTLs exist on each chromosome of rice, and the mapping results and the effect value of the same QTL in different studies are different [12]. Currently, nearly 90 rice dwarf genes have been discovered, and most of them are phytohormone biosynthesis defective mutations or signal transduction defective mutations [13]. Liu et al. have cloned the THIS1 gene on rice chromosome 1 that affects tillering of rice [14]. Jiao et al. have mapped the rice tiller number QTL on chromosome 8, and finally cloned the IPA1 (WFP) gene that affects tillering of rice [15]. Yan et al. and Kong et al. have mapped the rice erect panicle QTL between RM3700 and RM7424 on chromosome 9, and then Huang et al. cloned the DEP1 gene, the mutation of which enhances the vigor of meristems and leads to the lengthening of internodes of inflorescence, the increase of panicle length and number of grains per panicle [16-18]. Ashikari et al. have cloned the Gn1a gene that controls the number of grains per panicle from rice chromosome 1. When Gn1a expression decreases, cytokinins would accumulate in the inflorescence meristems, thereby increasing the number of reproductive organs and grains per panicle [19]. Rice grain weight is greatly affected by grain shape. GW2, GS3, GL3, and other genes are the major genes that control rice grain weight [20-22]. In this study, a total of 25 SSR markers significantly related to plant height, effective panicle number per plant, panicle length, total grain number, filled grain number, seed rating rate, and 1000-grain weight were obtained (P < 0.01), with the percentage of total variations explained ranging from 0.12% to 42.62%. 12 SSR markers distributed on 9 chromosomes were significantly associated with plant height. RM208 explained 42.62% of the total variations in plant height. We can speculate that RM208 may flank QTLs responsible for plant height. Four SSR markers distributed on chromosomes 1, 2, 7, and 8 were significantly associated with the effective panicle number per plant that were similar to the results of Liu et al. and Jiao et al. partly [14, 15]. 10 SSR markers distributed on 8 chromosomes were significantly associated with panicle length. 15 SSR markers distributed on 10 chromosomes were significantly associated with the total number of grains or the number of filled grains. Five SSR markers distributed on chromosomes 9, 10, and 12 were significantly associated to 1000-seed weight. No marker associated with 1000-grain weight mentioned by previous reports was found on chromosomes 2 and 3 [20-22]. It may be related to the germplasm specificity of Shanlan upland rice and needs further study. In this study, the SSR markers associated with each agronomic trait of Shanlan upland rice were all distributed on multiple chromosomes, which proves to a certain extent that these agronomic traits were regulated by multiple genes. On the other hand, this study also found that many SSR markers were significantly associated with 2 or more agronomic traits. RM493 was significantly associated with 6 agronomic traits. We can speculate that RM493 may flank QTLs playing a fundamental role in the intertwined regulatory network of agronomic traits of Shanlan upland rice. The genes encoding protein GFS12 (LOC4326972), protein transport protein SEC23 (LOC4326988), and probable 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase AOP1.2 (LOC112939546), which may play a role in the regulation of the agronomic traits of Shanlan upland rice, are located in chromosome 1 close to RM493 [23-25]. These genes are worthy of further study.

5. Conclusion

A total of 239 alleles were detected in 57 Hainan upland rice varieties using 35 SSR markers, and the number of alleles per locus was 2-19. The observed heterozygosity was 0.0655-0.3115. The Shannon diversity index was 0.1352-0.4827. The genetic similarity coefficient was 0.6736-0.9707, and 46 varieties were clustered into one group, indicating that the genetic base of the Shanlan upland rice germplasm was narrow. A total of 25 SSR markers significantly related to plant height, effective panicle number per plant, panicle length, total grain number, filled grain number, seed rating rate, and 1000-grain weight were obtained (P < 0.01), with the percentage of the total variations explained ranging from 0.12% to 42.62%. RM208 explained 42.62% of total variations in plant height of Shanlan upland rice. RM493 was significantly associated with 6 agronomic traits. We can speculate that RM208 may flank QTLs responsible for plant height and RM493 may flank QTLs playing a fundamental role in the intertwined regulatory network of the agronomic traits of Shanlan upland rice.
  15 in total

1.  Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production.

Authors:  Motoyuki Ashikari; Hitoshi Sakakibara; Shaoyang Lin; Toshio Yamamoto; Tomonori Takashi; Asuka Nishimura; Enrique R Angeles; Qian Qian; Hidemi Kitano; Makoto Matsuoka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  BEACH-domain proteins act together in a cascade to mediate vacuolar protein trafficking and disease resistance in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Ooi-kock Teh; Noriyuki Hatsugai; Kentaro Tamura; Kentaro Fuji; Ryo Tabata; Katsushi Yamaguchi; Shuji Shingenobu; Masashi Yamada; Mitsuyasu Hasebe; Shinichiro Sawa; Tomoo Shimada; Ikuko Hara-Nishimura
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 13.164

3.  Rice qGL3/OsPPKL1 Functions with the GSK3/SHAGGY-Like Kinase OsGSK3 to Modulate Brassinosteroid Signaling.

Authors:  Xiuying Gao; Jia-Qi Zhang; Xiaojun Zhang; Jun Zhou; Zhisheng Jiang; Peng Huang; Zhengbin Tang; Yongmei Bao; Jinping Cheng; Haijuan Tang; Wenhua Zhang; Hongsheng Zhang; Ji Huang
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 4.  Simple sequence repeat markers in genetic divergence and marker-assisted selection of rice cultivars: a review.

Authors:  Shubhneet Kaur; Parmjit S Panesar; Manab B Bera; Varinder Kaur
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.176

5.  Genome-wide association study using whole-genome sequencing rapidly identifies new genes influencing agronomic traits in rice.

Authors:  Kenji Yano; Eiji Yamamoto; Koichiro Aya; Hideyuki Takeuchi; Pei-Ching Lo; Li Hu; Masanori Yamasaki; Shinya Yoshida; Hidemi Kitano; Ko Hirano; Makoto Matsuoka
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  GOLGI TRANSPORT 1B Regulates Protein Export from the Endoplasmic Reticulum in Rice Endosperm Cells.

Authors:  Yihua Wang; Feng Liu; Yulong Ren; Yunlong Wang; Xi Liu; Wuhua Long; Di Wang; Jianping Zhu; Xiaopin Zhu; Ruonan Jing; Mingming Wu; Yuanyuan Hao; Ling Jiang; Chunming Wang; Haiyang Wang; Yiqun Bao; Jianmin Wan
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Identification and characterization of a major QTL responsible for erect panicle trait in japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.).

Authors:  Chang-Jie Yan; Ji-Hua Zhou; Song Yan; Feng Chen; Martin Yeboah; Shu-Zhu Tang; Guo-Hua Liang; Ming-Hong Gu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Comparative analysis of a Brassica BAC clone containing several major aliphatic glucosinolate genes with its corresponding Arabidopsis sequence.

Authors:  Muqiang Gao; Genyi Li; Bo Yang; W Richard McCombie; Carlos F Quiros
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.166

9.  Genetic Variation and Association Analysis of the SSR Markers Linked to the Major Drought-Yield QTLs of Rice.

Authors:  Narjes Tabkhkar; Babak Rabiei; Habibollah Samizadeh Lahiji; Maryam Hosseini Chaleshtori
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 1.890

10.  Genome-wide association study of seedling stage salinity tolerance in temperate japonica rice germplasm.

Authors:  Dariga Batayeva; Benedick Labaco; Changrong Ye; Xiaolin Li; Bakdaulet Usenbekov; Aiman Rysbekova; Gulzhamal Dyuskalieva; Georgina Vergara; Russell Reinke; Hei Leung
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.