| Literature DB >> 34712240 |
Erika Velásquez1, Beáta Szeitz2, Jeovanis Gil1,3, Jimmy Rodriguez4, Miklós Palkovits5, Éva Renner5, Tibor Hortobágyi6,7, Péter Döme8,9, Fábio Cs Nogueira10,11, György Marko-Varga12, Gilberto B Domont10, Melinda Rezeli12.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder and the most common cause of dementia worldwide. In AD, neurodegeneration spreads throughout different areas of the central nervous system (CNS) in a gradual and predictable pattern, causing progressive memory decline and cognitive impairment. Deposition of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in specific CNS regions correlates with the severity of AD and constitutes the basis for disease classification into different Braak stages (I-VI). Early clinical symptoms are typically associated with stages III-IV (i.e., limbic stages) when the involvement of the hippocampus begins. Histopathological changes in AD have been linked to brain proteome alterations, including aberrant posttranslational modifications (PTMs) such as the hyperphosphorylation of Tau. Most proteomic studies to date have focused on AD progression across different stages of the disease, by targeting one specific brain area at a time. However, in AD vulnerable regions, stage-specific proteomic alterations, including changes in PTM status occur in parallel and remain poorly characterized. Here, we conducted proteomic, phosphoproteomic, and acetylomic analyses of human postmortem tissue samples from AD (Braak stage III-IV, n=11) and control brains (n=12), covering all anatomical areas affected during the limbic stage of the disease (total hippocampus, CA1, entorhinal and perirhinal cortices). Overall, ~6000 proteins, ~9000 unique phosphopeptides and 221 acetylated peptides were accurately quantified across all tissues. Our results reveal significant proteome changes in AD brains compared to controls. Among others, we have observed the dysregulation of pathways related to the adaptive and innate immune responses, including several altered antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). Notably, some of these changes were restricted to specific anatomical areas, while others altered according to disease progression across the regions studied. Our data highlights the molecular heterogeneity of AD and the relevance of neuroinflammation as a major player in AD pathology. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD027173.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; acetylomics; limbic stage; neuroinflammation; phosphoproteomics; proteomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34712240 PMCID: PMC8546208 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.750665
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Analytical workflow for the proteomic characterization of AD vulnerable brain areas. AD and control tissues from four different brain areas were isolated after histological evaluation. Proteins were extracted and subjected to a proteomics and bioinformatics workflow, including the characterization of changes in protein acetylation and phosphorylation patterns. (AD, Alzheimer’s disease; CA1, CA1 region of the hippocampal complex; EC, Entorhinal cortex; HP, Hippocampus; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; NAS-d3, N-acetoxy-succinimide-d3; PRC, Perirhinal cortex).
Quantitative summary of the global-, phosphoproteome and acetylome analyses in the four studied AD-brain areas (HP, hippocampus; CA1, CA1 region of the hippocampal cortex; EC, entorhinal cortex; PRC, perirhinal cortex).
| Brain area | Global proteome – proteins | Phosphoproteome - phosphopeptides | Phosphoproteome – phosphorylation state | Acetylome – acetylated peptides | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total* | ON in AD | OFF in AD | UP-regulated in AD | DOWN-regulated in AD | Total* | ON in AD | OFF in AD | UP-regulated in AD | DOWN-regulated in AD | Total* | UP-regulated in AD | DOWN-regulated in AD | Total* | ON in AD | OFF in AD | UP-regulated in AD | DOWN-regulated in AD | |
|
| 5411 | 58 | 11 | 52 | 63 | 8029 | 293 | 94 | 444 | 237 | 6336 | 327 | 166 | 186 | 18 | 19 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 5556 | 27 | 9 | 21 | 45 | 7207 | 203 | 15 | 75 | 27 | 5828 | 48 | 24 | 217 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 2 |
|
| 4946 | 6 | 10 | 30 | 33 | 9166 | 12 | 8 | 18 | 55 | 7059 | 12 | 20 | 104 | – | 2 | 3 | 6 |
|
| 5486 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 14 | 8134 | 21 | 56 | 51 | 37 | 6490 | 26 | 29 | 155 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
*Total number of proteins, phosphopeptides and acetylated peptides used for quantitative analysis.
Figure 2(A) Main biological processes representative for the hippocampus (HP) in the qualitative analysis. The “ON” condition represents biological processes and pathways that are associated with AD samples. On the contrary, the “OFF” condition represents biological processes and pathways that are linked to control samples. (B) Kinome analysis of the HP based on the qualitative comparison of AD and control samples. (C) Volcano plot derived from the global proteome data, as an example of the variation in the relative abundances of proteins between AD and control samples. (D) Relevant biological processes and pathways dysregulated in the HP across all datasets.
Figure 3(A) Biological processes emerging from the qualitative analysis of the CA1 region. (B) Kinome map of the CA1 region derived from the qualitative analysis of AD and control samples (C) Volcano plot of the global proteome data representing the variation in protein abundances between AD and control samples. (D) Main biological processes and pathways altered in the CA1 region.
Figure 4(A) Main biological processes derived from the qualitative analysis of the EC. (B) Kinome analysis of the EC based on the qualitative comparison of AD and control data sets. (C) Volcano plot of the global proteome data representing the variation in protein abundances between AD and control samples in the EC. (D) Biological processes and pathways associated with the dysregulated proteins in the EC across all datasets.
Figure 5(A) Biological processes derived from the qualitative analysis of the PRC. (B) Kinome map of the PRC based on the qualitative comparison of AD and control samples. (C) Volcano plot of the PRC global proteome data, as an example of the variation in the relative abundances of proteins between AD and control samples. (D) Key biological processes and pathways represented by proteins altered between control and AD samples in the PRC.
Figure 6Molecular trajectories across the AD vulnerable areas. (A) Protein clusters from the global proteome analysis with altered log2 fold change (AD/C median) profiles across the four brain areas. (B) Log2 fold change profiles with increasing and decreasing tendencies across the four AD vulnerable brain areas of 4 representative proteins. Data derived from the global proteome analysis. (C) Phosphopeptide clusters with altered log2 fold changes (AD/C median) across the four brain areas. (D) Log2 fold change profiles with increasing and decreasing tendencies across the four AD vulnerable brain areas of 4 representative phosphoproteins. Data derived from the phosphoproteomic analysis.
Figure 7Mapping of proteins with antimicrobial peptide function across the four brain regions. (A) Venn diagram representing the overlap between our current proteomic data set and proteins with previously reported antimicrobial peptide activity. (B) Venn diagram showing the overlap of AMPs across all brain areas in this study. (C) Interaction network between the identified AMPs in each investigated brain area. Nodes highlighted with darker colors represent proteins with changes in their relative abundance.