| Literature DB >> 34711247 |
Ekaterina Mostovenko1, Matthew M Dahm2, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan2,3, Tracy Eye4, Aaron Erdely4, Tamara L Young5, Matthew J Campen5, Andrew K Ottens6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Growing industrial use of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers (CNT/F) warrants consideration of human health outcomes. CNT/F produces pulmonary, cardiovascular, and other toxic effects in animals along with a significant release of bioactive peptides into the circulation, the augmented serum peptidome. While epidemiology among CNT/F workers reports on few acute symptoms, there remains concern over sub-clinical CNT/F effects that may prime for chronic disease, necessitating sensitive health outcome diagnostic markers for longitudinal follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarkers; Carbon nanofibers; Carbon nanotubes; Cardiovascular; Health outcomes; Mass spectrometry; Nanomaterials; Nanotoxicology; Occupational; Peptidomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34711247 PMCID: PMC8555107 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-021-00431-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
CNT/F worker demographics, exposure, and SCIP metrics for low and high exposure groups
| Worker demographics and exposure metric data | Exposure groups | |
|---|---|---|
| High | Low | |
| Age [binned 1–5]a, | 3.0 (0.4) | 3.0 (0.3) |
| Sex, # Females, n (%) | 3 (25) | 2 (17) |
| Education [binned 1–4]b, | 2.8 (0.4) | 3.2 (0.3) |
| Former Smokers, n (%) | 3 (25) | 2 (17) |
| Allergies, n (%) | 5 (42) | 5 (42) |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 3 (25) | 2 (17) |
| Current solvent Exp., n (%) | 7 (58) | 6 (50) |
| Past solvent Exp., n (%) | 6 (50) | 5 (42) |
| Inhalable EC [µg/m3], | 8.706 (5.402) | 0.055 (0.014) |
| Respirable EC [µg/m3], | 1.564 (0.964) | 0.017 (0.006) |
| CNT/F structure Count [s/cm3], | 0.442 (0.310) | 0.005 (0.002) |
| CNT/F duration [binned 1–5]c, | 3.3 (0.3) | 2.4 (0.4) |
| IL6 log fold-change, | 0.958 (0.094) | 0.980 (0.069) |
| CCL2 log fold-change, | 0.830 (0.077) | 1.001 (0.099) |
| TNFalpha log fold-change, | 1.231 (0.187) | 0.950 (0.102) |
| VCAM log fold-change, | 1.159 (0.178) | 1.154 (0.141) |
| ICAM log fold-change, | 0.907 (0.128) | 1.228 (0.247) |
¯, mean; SE, standard error; n, sample size; EC, elemental carbon; CNT/F, carbon nanotubes and nanofibers; SCIP, serum cumulative inflammatory potential
aAge binning (years): 1 (< 25), 2 (25- < 35), 3 (35- < 45), 4 (45- < 55), 5 (55- < 65)
bEducation binning: 1 (high/trade school), 2 (some college), 3 (college grad), 4 (postgraduate)
cCNT/F exposure duration binning (years): 1 (0), 2 (0.01- < 1), 3 (1- < 5), 4 (5- < 10), 5 (≥ 10)
Fig. 1The serum peptidome discriminated workers with acute CNT/F exposure. The serum peptidome was quantified across manufacturing workers grouped by Low (< 0.1 µg/m3 inhalable EC fraction) and High (> 0.5 µg/m3 inhalable EC fraction) CNT/F exposure across two workdays. a Relative peptide ion intensity is perspective-plotted by reduced mass and chromatographic retention time measures, illustrating significant differences between High and Low exposure groups. b Relative quantity across individual workers is shown by heatmap for the 934 statistically responsive serum peptides detected in ≥ 75% of workers. Data are plotted as log(2) fold change from the Low-group mean. c The serum peptidome response as illustrated by a volcano plot of fold-change from the Low-group mean plotted against p-values, with the significance threshold adjusted to a 5% FDR
Fig. 2Serum peptidome biomarker model building with linear correlated features of worker CNT/F exposure. The 934 significantly responsive serum peptides were assessed by multivariate linear regression against metrics of CNT/F breathing zone levels, worker demographics and histories, and assay measures of serum inflammatory potential. a Out-of-sample predictive error was assessed by Akaike information criterion (AICc) scores for multivariate worker metric combinations. b Performance was best when taking the linear combination of three personal breathing zone CNT/F measures, log∑(Exp), with linearity exemplified for peptide KELGALQQC. c Moderate correlation (Shapiro R2) was observed across 39% of the responsive peptides for respirable EC measures (logResEC), with performance improved when adding inhalable EC (logInhResEC) and CNT/F structure counts (log∑(Exp)). Additional serum peptidome variability was explained by covariates for serum induction of IL6 and worker age. d-e Venn diagrams illustrating the overlap of strongly correlated (R2 > 0.7) serum peptides between multivariate worker metrics
Fig. 3Discriminant peptide ranking for biomarker model refinement. PLS-DA was employed to select the most predictive peptide measures that a resolved High CNT/F and Low CNT/F exposure groups. b The rank of each peptide measure’s contribution to the PLS-DA model was provided by the weighted sum to the squared correlation as a VIP score (peptide measures shown by their unique index identifier). Using an accepted 1.0 VIP cutoff, 41 peptide measures were found most discriminatory between groups. c Box plot of the top five scoring peptide measures between High and Low CNT/F exposure groups
Fig. 4Validation of the serum peptidome biomarker model for classifying CNT/F worker exposure. a The performance of the top-five peptide model was assessed by cross-validation where the average class probabilities for validation subjects were plotted. Ideal classification was demonstrated as illustrated within the confusion matrix table. b To rule out model over-fitting, the full complement of 3,532 reproducibly detected peptides (without any supervised selection) was assessed by unsupervised principal component analysis where 43.5% of the serum peptidome variance could be explained by worker CNT/F exposure level
Fig. 5Identification and functional relevance of the 41 top-ranked discriminant peptides. a Fold-change response of the identified discriminant peptides grouped by their originating protein symbol (excluding FGA). Mean ± S.E., q-value < 0.05, normalized to the Low group mean. b Functional classification of the 20 parent proteins for the identified discriminant peptides. c Fold-change response for six identified fibrinopeptide A fragments per normal exoproteolytic serum metabolism, with the most stable (15.2 h half-life) shown boxed. Mean ± S.E., q-value < 0.05, normalized to the Low group mean. d Plot of the mean peptide ion intensity across all study subjects (gray) and the half-life in hours (orange, values from Yi et al. [28]) for the six identified fibrinopeptide A fragments
Cross-study comparison of cardiovascular-related blood biomarker responses to CNT/F exposure
| Serum protein biomarker (or peptide parent) | Liou et al. (2012) | Liao et al. (2014) | Kuijpers et al. (2018) | Beard et al. (2018) | Mostovenko et al. (2019) | Current study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-sectional | Longitudinal | Cross-sectional | Cross-sectional | Mouse Model | Case–control | |
| ADAM15 | Up | |||||
| Fetuin-A | Up | Up | ||||
| Albumin | Up & Down | Down | ||||
| ARHGAP21 | Down | |||||
| COG8 | Up | |||||
| CPXM2 | Up | |||||
| F13A | Up | |||||
| Fibrillin-1 | Up | Up | ||||
| Fibrinogen-A | Up | Unchanged | Unchanged | Up & Down | Down | Down |
| Fibrinopeptide-A | Up & Down | Up & Down | ||||
| FLNC | Up | |||||
| ICAM-1 | Up | Unchanged | Up | Up | ||
| PLPP3 | Down | |||||
| t-PA | Unchanged | Down | ||||
| VCAM-1 | Unchanged | Up | Unchanged | Up | ||
| vWF (VWDE) | Unchanged | Down | Down | Down |