| Literature DB >> 28644070 |
Ting Wang1, Yuka Shimizu1, Xiaomin Wu1, Gabriel T Kelly1, Xiaoyan Xu1, Lichun Wang2, Zhongqing Qian3, Yin Chen4, Joe G N Garcia1.
Abstract
Increased exposure to ambient particulate matter (PM) is associated with elevated morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases and cancer. We and others have shown that PM induces lung microvascular barrier dysfunction which potentially enhances the systemic toxicity of PM. However, the mechanisms by which PM disrupts vascular endothelial integrity remain incompletely explored. We hypothesize that PM induces endothelial cell (EC) cytoskeleton rearrangement via Rho GTPase-dependent pathways to facilitate vascular hyperpermeability. Fine PM induced time-dependent activation of cytoskeletal machinery with increases in myosin light chain (MLC) phosphorylation and EC barrier disruption measured by transendothelial electrical resistance (TER), events attenuated by the Rho-dependent kinase (ROCK) inhibitor Y-27632 or the reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger, N-acetylcysteine (NAC). Both Y-27632 and NAC prevented PM-induced stress fiber formation and phospho-MLC accumulation in human lung ECs. PM promotes rapid accumulation of Rho-GTP. This event is attenuated by NAC or knockdown of RhoA (siRNA). Consistent with ROCK activation, PM induced phosphorylation of myosin light chain phosphatase (MYPT) at Thr850, a post-translational modification known to inhibit phosphatase activity. Furthermore, PM activates the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rho, p115, with p115 translocation to the cell periphery, in a ROS-dependent manner. Together these results demonstrate that fine PM induces EC cytoskeleton rearrangement via Rho-dependent pathways that are dependent upon the generation of oxidative stress. As the disruption of vascular integrity further contributes to cardiopulmonary physiologic derangements, these findings provide pharmacologic targets for prevention of PM-induced cardiopulmonary toxicity.Entities:
Keywords: ROCK; endothelial barrier; myosin light chain; particulate matter
Year: 2017 PMID: 28644070 PMCID: PMC5841899 DOI: 10.1086/689906
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pulm Circ ISSN: 2045-8932 Impact factor: 3.017
Fig. 1.PM induces MLC phosphorylation and endothelial barrier disruption, both of which are attenuated by a ROS scavenger or a ROCK inhibitor. (a) PM mediated time-dependent MLC phosphorylation. (b) PM-induced MLC phosphorylation was reduced by Y-27632 (Y, 10 μM) or NAC (5 mM). (c) PM-induced endothelial barrier disruption (by TER measurements) was significantly inhibited by Y compound, NAC or a combination of Y and NAC. n = 4–5. *P < 0.05 compared with control. **P < 0.05 compared with PM only group.
Fig. 2.PM-induced phospho-MLC co-localizes with stress fibers. PM challenge (100 µg/mL) stimulated stress fiber (F-actin) synthesis and MLC phosphorylation. Phospho-MLC was co-localized with stress fibers. Y (10 μM, 1 h pretreatment) or NAC (5 mM, 1 h pretreatment) abolished PM-induced stress fiber formation and MLC phosphorylation in ECs. These exhibiting images are representative images from three independent repeats.
Fig. 3.PM activates RhoA in human lung EC. (a) PM challenge (100 µg/mL) enriched the active form of Rho (GTP bound Rho) in ECs, which was inhibited by NAC (5 mM). (b) RhoA siRNA reduced RhoA expression and inhibited PM-induced MLC phosphorylation. (c) RhoA siRNA significantly inhibited PM-induced endothelial barrier disruption. n = 4–5. *P < 0.05 compared with siControl.
Fig. 4.PM induces ROCK-mediated MYPT1 phosphorylation. (a) PM induced MYPT phosphorylation at Thr850, which was inhibited by Y (10 μM, 1 h pretreatment) or NAC (5 mM, 1 h pretreatment). (b) siRNAs of ROCK1 (R1) or ROCK2 (R2), or a combination of siRNAs of ROCK1 and ROCK2 (R12) successfully reduced protein expression of ROCK1 or ROCK2 or both after 48 h incubation, respectively. (c) PM-induced MYPT phosphorylation was inhibited by siRNAs of R1, R2, R12, or RhoA. (d) PM-induced endothelial barrier disruption was significantly inhibited by siRNAs of R1, R2, or R12. n = 4–5. *P < 0.05 compared to siControl (the first group).