| Literature DB >> 34709977 |
Mohd Jahir Khan1, Anshuman Rai2, Ankesh Ahirwar1,3, Vandana Sirotiya1, Megha Mourya1, Sudhanshu Mishra1, Benoit Schoefs3, Justine Marchand3, Shashi Kant Bhatia4, Sunita Varjani5, Vandana Vinayak1.
Abstract
Microalgae have been recognized as one of the most efficient microorganisms to remediate industrial effluents. Among microalgae diatoms are silica shelled unicellular eukaryotes, found in all types of water bodies and flourish very well even in wastewater. They have their silica cell wall made up of nano arrayed pores arranged in a uniform fashion. Therefore, they act as smart nanocontainers to adsorb various trace metals, dyes, polymers, and drugs which are hazardous to human as well to aquatic life. The beautiful nanoarchitecture in diatoms allows them to easily bind to ligands of choice to form a nanocomposite structure with the pollutants which can be a chemical or biological component. Such naturally available diatom nanomaterials are economical and highly sensitive compared to manmade artificial silica nanomaterials to help in facile removal of the toxic pollutants from wastewater. This review is thus focused on employing diatoms to remediate various pollutants such as heavy metals, dyes, hydrocarbons detected in the wastewater. It also includes different microalgae as biosensors for determination of pollutants in effluents and the perspectives for nanotechnological applications in the field of remediating pollutants through microalgae. The review also discusses in length the hurdles and perspectives of employing microalgae in wastewater remediation.Entities:
Keywords: Biosensors; Diatoms; Microalgae; Nanomaterials; Pollutants; Wastewater
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34709977 PMCID: PMC8810035 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1996748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Microalgae for metal removal from wastewater
| Metals | Microalgal strain | Removal efficiency (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, zinc, cadmium, and mercury | Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, and Hg2+ were 99%, 85%, 97%, and 98%, respectively | [ | |
| Cadmium | 73% | [ | |
| Chromium | 50.7–80.3% | [ | |
| Copper | 94.9% | [ | |
| Lead | 89.26% | [ | |
| Mercury | 79–86% | [ | |
| Nickel | 97% | [ | |
| Zinc | 60–70% | [ | |
| Cadmium, Copper, Lead, and Zinc | Reduction in Cu and Cd | [ | |
| Chromium | 75% and 100% removal for Cr (III) and Cr (VI), respectively | [ | |
| Lead, Cadmium, Copper, and Arsenic | Metals were removed | [ |
Deformed diatoms on exposure to metals
| Diatoms | Teratology | Pollutant | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deformed raphe channel | Zinc and copper | [ | |
| Abnormal outline | Fluoranthene (pesticides) | [ | |
| Distorted outline | Cadmium | [ | |
| Deformed valve outline | Pesticides | [ | |
| Distorted outline | Cadmium, arsenic, lead, mercury, copper, zinc | [ | |
| Deformed central area | Copper | [ | |
| Distorted outline (twist in middle of the valve) | Copper | [ | |
| Distorted valve outline | Zinc and copper | [ | |
| Deformed valve outline | Cadmium, arsenic, lead, mercury, copper, zinc | [ | |
| Deformed striation pattern in the side of the valve | Cyanide and heavy metals | [ | |
| Bent or dilate, absence of symmetry | Copper, iron, zinc, nickel | [ | |
| Distorted outline | Cadmium, zinc, lead | [ | |
| Abnormal boundaries or wrinkled shaped | Copper and zinc | [ | |
| Dilated in the middle of the valve | Lead and selenium | [ |
Figure 1.Diatoms undergoing valve deformation and increase lipid accumulation under stress conditions during remediation of pollutants
Figure 2.Schematic representation of surface modification and treatment of DE, and their application in the removal of dyes and metal ions along with regeneration. Reproduced with permission from [145]
Figure 3.Lab on Chip Diatom Electro Machine (LOC-DEM) to remove wastewater pollutants while clean separating the algal concentrate flowing at hydrodynamic flow under the influence of intracellular spectral recomposition of light