| Literature DB >> 34709541 |
Mahsa Mohajeri1,2, Ehsan Horriatkhah3,4, Reza Mohajery5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is seen in COVID-19 patients, and reducing malnutrition with appropriate therapies may improve these patients' health. This case-control study aimed to assess and compare serum levels of some inflammatory factors, oxidative stress, and appetite in COVID-19 patients with respiratory infections that receive glutamine treatment with a control group.Entities:
Keywords: Appetite; COVID-19; Glutamine; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34709541 PMCID: PMC8552429 DOI: 10.1007/s10787-021-00881-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Inflammopharmacology ISSN: 0925-4692 Impact factor: 4.473
Demographic characteristics of the study groups
| Variables | Control group | Case group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 51.3 ± 8.2 | 51.2 ± 6.7 | 0.114 |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 110 (47.82%) | 112 (50.45) | 0.387 |
| Male | 120(52.18%) | 110 (49.55) | 0.420 |
| Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | 29.1 ± 3.4 | 29.4 ± 7.2 | 0.201 |
| Smoking | 43 (18.69) | 41 (18.46) | 0.744 |
*Based on independent T-test
Symptoms, medication for COVID-19, and physical examination findings of the study groups
| Symptoms | Control group | Case group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fever | 202 (87.82) | 205 (92.34) | 0.428 |
| Cough | 230 (100) | 220 (100) | 0.314 |
| Dispne | 143 (62.17) | 140 (63.06) | 0.142 |
| Fatigue | 220 (95.65) | 218(98.19) | 0.480 |
| Taste/smell abnormalities | 82 (35.65) | 80 (44.44) | 0.105 |
| Diarrhea | 48(20.86) | 50 (22.52) | 0.238 |
| Medications | |||
| Hydroxychloroquine | 230 (100) | 222 (100) | 0.808 |
| Oseltamivir | 230 (100) | 222 (100) | 0.619 |
| Azithromycin | 230 (100) | 222(100) | 0.616 |
| Moxifloxacin | 230 (100) | 222 (100) | 0.808 |
| Lopinavir/Ritonavir | 230 (100) | 222(100) | 0.611 |
| Favipiravir | 230 (100) | 222 (100) | 0.472 |
| Other antibiotics | 230(100) | 222 (100) | 0.148 |
| Fever (C) | 39.2 ± 0.6 | 39.6 ± 0.9 | 0.149 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 107 ± 11 | 106 ± 12 | 0.439 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 78 ± 5 | 77 ± 4 | 0.204 |
| Heart rate (/min.) | 89.7 ± 6.4 | 89.1 ± 7.4 | 0.254 |
| SO2 (%) | 92.6 ± 4.6 | 92.9 ± 2.9 | 0.179 |
| Respiratory rate (/min.) | 18.2 ± 4.3 | 18.4 ± 5.2 | 0.388 |
| Pneumonia Severity Index | 72.6 ± 10.33 | 71.8 ± 12.1 | 0.143 |
| Pneumonia Severity Index Grade | |||
| I | 0 | 0 0.219 | |
| II | 230 (100) | 222 (100) | |
| III | 0 | 0 | |
| IV | 0 | 0 | |
| V | 0 | 0 | |
*Based on Chi-square test
Duration of hospitalization, the necessity of intensive care unit, and mortality of the study groups after intervention
| Control group | Case group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Duration of hospitalization | 14.3 ± 5.3 | 10.5 ± 4.8 | |
| Necessity of intensive care unit (%) | 123(53.47) | 0 | |
| Mortality | 38 (3.47) | 0 |
*Based on independents t-test
**The significance level is less than 0.05
Laboratory, physical examination findings and serum stress oxidative of the study groups
| Case group | Control group | P** | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before glutamine | After glutamine | Before study | After study | ||||
| Physical examination findings | |||||||
| Systolic BP(mmHg) | 106 ± 12 | 105 ± 15 | 0.125 | 107 ± 11 | 106 ± 9 | 0.124 | 0.094 |
| Diastolic BP(mmHg) | 77 ± 4 | 76 ± 9 | 0.118 | 78 ± 5 | 77 ± 4 | 0.230 | |
| Heart rate (/min.) | 89.1 ± 7.4 | 89.3 ± 8.8 | 0.403 | 89.7 ± 6.6 | 89.1 ± 7.6 | 0.103 | 0.147 |
| SO2 (%) | 92.9 ± 2.9 | 92.7 ± 5.1 | 0.119 | 92.6 ± 4.6 | 92.6 ± 2.7 | 0.119 | 0.101 |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | 72.1 ± 10.9 | 72.5 ± 13.9 | 0.247 | 72.8 ± 12.6 | 72.9 ± 9.6 | 0.507 | 0.116 |
| Need for vasopressors | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | ||
| Quick SOFA (qSOFA) Scoring System | |||||||
| Altered mental status | |||||||
| Glasgow coma scale < | 76 (37.83) | 0 | 80 (34.78) | 89(38.69) | 0.051 | ||
| Total Quick SOFA Score (qSOFA) | |||||||
| 1 | 74 (33.33) | 0 | 68(29.62) | 70(30.43) | 0.085 | ||
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TNF-α | 6.72 ± 4.1 | 3.21 ± 1.4 | 5.49 ± 2.9 | 5.52 ± 3.2 | 0.204 | ||
| Hs-CRP | 19.14 ± 5.8 | 12.01 ± 4.9 | 19.64 ± 6.4 | 19.52 ± 3.2 | 0.119 | ||
| MDA | 5.8 ± 0.44 | 2.9 ± 0.82 | 5.1 ± 0.32 | 5.8 ± 0.23 | 0.401 | ||
| TAC | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 0.83 ± 0.06 | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.03 | 0.625 | ||
| Interleukin 1 beta (pg/ml) | 3.83 ± 0.06 | 1.02 ± 0.01 | 3.69 ± 0.08 | 3.70 ± 0.02 | 0.231 | ||
*p value is based on paired T test
**p value is based on independent T test
Comparison of appetite after the intervention
| Variables | Intervention group | Control group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Desire to eat | 218 | 52 | 0.01 |
| Satiety time after eating | |||
| After eating a few tablespoons to a third of a plate | 20 | 194 | 0.02 |
| After eating half to all the food is served | 200 | 36 | |
| Rarely satiated | 0 | 0 | |
| Time of feel hungry | |||
| Never | 0 | 0 | 0.004 |
| Low and sometimes | 106 | 180 | |
| The whole day | 116 | 50 | |
| Patients' opinions about the taste of food | |||
| Bad and very bad | 41 | 104 | 0.01 |
| Moderate | 10 | 101 | |
| Good and very good | 171 | 25 | |
| No | 0 | 0 | |
*Based on chi-square test
Comparison of laboratory, physical examination findings, and serum stress oxidative of the study groups based on Sidak’s test
| Variables | P1 | P2 | P3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | Case group | After study | |
| Before study – after study | Before study – after study | Case–control | |
| Quick SOFA (qSOFA) scoring system | 0.654 | ||
| TNF-α | 0.211 | ||
| Hs-CRP | 0.095 | ||
| MDA | 0.082 | ||
| TAC | 0.972 | ||
| Interleukin 1 beta | 0.0725 |
P1: Comparison of variables related to before study and after study in the control group
P2: Comparison of variables related to before study and after study in the case group
P3: Comparison of variables between control and case group after the study
**The significance level is less than 0.05