| Literature DB >> 34705163 |
Vishal Balasubramanian1, Sapthagirivasan Vivekanandhan2,3, Venkatesh Mahadevan4.
Abstract
Efficient remote monitoring of the patient infected with coronavirus without spread to healthcare workers is the need of the hour. An effectual and faster communication system must be established wherein the healthcare workers at the remote quarantine ward can communicate with healthcare professionals present in specialty hospitals. Incidentally, there is a need to establish a contactless smart cloud-based connection between a specialty hospital and quarantine wards during pandemic situation. This paper proposes an initial contactless web-based tele-health clinical decision support system that integrates near-field communication (NFC) tags and a smart cloud-based structuring tool that enables the quick diagnosis of patients with COVID-19 symptoms and monitors the remotely located quarantine wards during the recent pandemic. The proposed framework consists of three-stages: (i) contactless health parameter extraction from the patient using an NFC tag; (ii) converting medical report into digital text using optical character recognition algorithm and extracting values of relevant medical-parameters using natural language processing; and (iii) smart visualization of key medical parameters. The accuracy of the proposed system from NFC reader until analysis using a novel structuring algorithm deployed in the cloud is more than 94%. Several capabilities of the proposed web-based system were compared with similar systems and tested in an authentic mock clinical setup, and the physicians found that the system is reliable and user friendly.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical decision support systems; Electronic medical records; Mobile health; Remote consultation; Telemedicine
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34705163 PMCID: PMC8548353 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-021-02456-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput ISSN: 0140-0118 Impact factor: 2.602
Fig. 1The clinical workflow of the proposed pandemic tele-health system with comparison of conventional workflow
Fig. 2The process flow of the proposed cloud-based pandemic tele-health system in which the patients are to be monitored at a mobile and a remote quarantine ward
Fig. 3The process of uploading of medical records to the database by the healthcare worker at the mobile quarantine ward by reading the patient’s NFC tag
Fig. 4Steps involved in “keywords” extraction from the medical report, which was converted into text files from image format using OCR
Fig. 5Extraction of “parameter values” for each medical data through keyword detection and neighbor search algorithm
Fig. 6Identification of various keywords from narrative text of the medical reports uploaded using POS tagging algorithm and represent as tabular data for ease of reading and adding them to the EMR database
Fig. 7User interface design of the proposed application on the quarantine ward end to capture and upload clinical parameters and send to a specialty hospital
Fig. 8User interface design of the proposed application on the specialty hospital end where medical data are structured and displayed in tabular form, whereas the images can be either viewed or downloaded
Fig. 9Smart decision support feature in the application plots key health parameters. The plotting feature enables the doctor to track the variations in a particular medical parameter reading taken at different time intervals
Fig. 10Visualization of structured data obtained by proposed smart structuring tool on the specialty hospital end
Fig. 11Messaging applet built within the web application to empower communication between the quarantine ward and the specialty hospital. The applet has an inbuilt smart answer suggestion system enabling faster and easier communication on both the ends
Efficiency of the proposed smart structuring algorithm: comparison of parameter extraction in multiple attempts
| Key parameters/performances | “Ground Truth” parameters | Number of parameters correctly identified by the proposed method | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attempt 1 | Attempt 2 | Attempt 3 | |||
| Total number of medical case records ( | The aggregated sum of parameters extracted from 1200 case records | 29,994 | 29,922 | 29,925 | 29,923 |
| Average number of parameters per case record (± Std. Dev) | 24.995 (± 3.219) | 24.935 (± 3.133) | 24.938 (± 3.137) | 24.936 (± 3.134) | |
| Minimum and Maximum number of parameters per case record [min–max] | [20–30] | ||||
“Ground Truth” parameters were manually extracted by clinical expert
Review of various pre-existing patient monitoring and clinical decision support systems
| Authors | Algorithm/tech used | Use case | Results obtained |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andreea et al | Arduino Uno and ECG sensor | Pregnant women | Pregnant women monitoring using mobile app |
| Lai et al | Patient fatigue level monitoring using self-reporting, interactive app | Juvenile cancer patients | |
| Reiss et al | Left ventricular assist device, wireless controller, cloud analytics, physician workstation | Patients with heart failure | |
| Al-Naggar et al | Arduino Mega for collection of data from several sensors through Wi-Fi | People living in remote locations | |
| Sathya and Kumar [ | Blowfish algorithm for encrypting medical data and Ciphertext policy attribute-based encryption for authorization | Patients using internet connected biosensors | Fast and secure data transmission |
| Novo et al | Cardiovascular parameters tracking system using sensors | Patients in early stages of and those with cardiovascular disorders | Tracking of all the parameters related to cardiovascular disorders made it possible to detect them in advance |
| (i) An NFC chip to connect with the patient’s medical records. (ii) A novel cloud-based structuring algorithm with inbuilt OCR Engine | Monitoring of patients in remote quarantine wards during pandemic situations | Accuracy: 4.6, user friendliness: 4.8, importance of system: 4/4 physicians agreed, system adaptability: 4.2, latency: 2.7 s for message transmission, 4.8 s for processing of records Accuracy: 94%, system size: 1.8 megabytes |
Comparison of evaluation and performance metrics of similar NLP algorithms that use patient-authored textual data
| Author | Data source | Data type | Number of documents | Evaluation and performance metrics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freifeld et al. [ | Tweets with mentions of 23 drugs and 4 vaccines and resemblance to adverse events | 4401 tweets | Automated, dictionary-based symptom classification had 72% recall and 86% precision | |
| Gupta et al. [ | Online community forum for asthma, ENT, adult type II diabetes, acne, and breast cancer | Sentences | 680,071 sentences | Extracts symptoms and conditions with an F-measure of 66–76% |
| Jimeno-Yepes et al. [ | Tweets with 2 out of 3 entity types–diseases, symptoms, or pharmacological substances | 1300 tweets | Highest performing model (Micromed + Meta) had precision, recall, and F-measure as 72%, 60%, and 66%, respectively | |
| Karmen et al. [ | Online public mental health message board | User posts within a 20–200 word interval | 1304 posts | Average precision of 84% and an average F-measure of 79% |
| Liu & Chen [ | 3 online patient forums for diabetes and 1 for heart disease | Patient discussion posts | 1,072,474 posts | Average F-measure of 90% for drug entity extraction and average F-measure of 80% for medical event extraction |
| Nikfarjam et al. [ | Twitter and a health-related social network | Tweets and user posts for 81 widely used drugs | 1784 tweets and 6279 posts | 86%, 78%, and 82% for precision, recall, and F-measure, respectively |
| Eshleman & Singh [ | Tweets with mention of 200 commonly prescribed drugs | 157,735 tweets | Precision exceeding 85% and F-measure over 81% | |
| Kilicoglu et al. [ | PubMed | Abstracts of manuscripts | - | 0.55 precision, 0.34 recall, and 0.42 F1 score |
| Patient medical records | Medical data extracted from scanned medical records | 1200 records contain aggregated sum of 29,994 parameters | Precision: 94% Recall: 91% F1 score: 92% |