O Matuka1, T S Singh2, E Bryce3, A Yassi4, O Kgasha5, M Zungu6, K Kyaw5, M Malotle5, K Renton5, L O'Hara4. 1. National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Pathology, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 2. National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Pathology, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Electronic address: Tanusha.singh@nioh.nhls.ac.za. 3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 4. School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 5. National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa. 6. National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Public Health Medicine, School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Airborne transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis remains an occupational health hazard, particularly in crowded and resource-limited healthcare settings. AIM: To quantify airborne M. tuberculosis in a busy outpatient clinic in Gauteng, South Africa. METHODS: Stationary air samples and samples from healthcare workers (HCWs) were collected in the polyclinic and administrative block. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect airborne M. tuberculosis. Walkthrough observations and work practices of HCWs were also recorded. FINDINGS: In total, M. tuberculosis was detected in 11 of 49 (22.4%) samples: nine of 25 (36%) HCW samples and two of 24 (8.3%) stationary air samples. Samples from five of 10 medical officers (50%) and three of 13 nurses (23%) were positive. Repeat measurements on different days showed variable results. Most of the HCWs (87.5%) with positive results had been in contact with coughing patients and had not worn respiratory masks despite training. CONCLUSION: The use of air sampling coupled with quantitative real-time PCR is a simple and effective tool to demonstrate the risk of M. tuberculosis exposure. The findings provide an impetus for hospital management to strengthen infection prevention and control measures for tuberculosis.
BACKGROUND: Airborne transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis remains an occupational health hazard, particularly in crowded and resource-limited healthcare settings. AIM: To quantify airborne M. tuberculosis in a busy outpatient clinic in Gauteng, South Africa. METHODS: Stationary air samples and samples from healthcare workers (HCWs) were collected in the polyclinic and administrative block. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect airborne M. tuberculosis. Walkthrough observations and work practices of HCWs were also recorded. FINDINGS: In total, M. tuberculosis was detected in 11 of 49 (22.4%) samples: nine of 25 (36%) HCW samples and two of 24 (8.3%) stationary air samples. Samples from five of 10 medical officers (50%) and three of 13 nurses (23%) were positive. Repeat measurements on different days showed variable results. Most of the HCWs (87.5%) with positive results had been in contact with coughing patients and had not worn respiratory masks despite training. CONCLUSION: The use of air sampling coupled with quantitative real-time PCR is a simple and effective tool to demonstrate the risk of M. tuberculosis exposure. The findings provide an impetus for hospital management to strengthen infection prevention and control measures for tuberculosis.
Authors: M M Malotle; J M Spiegel; A Yassi; D Ngubeni; L M O'Hara; P A Adu; E A Bryce; N Mlangeni; G S M Gemell; M Zungu Journal: Public Health Action Date: 2017-12-21
Authors: Erick W Bunyasi; Keren Middelkoop; Anastasia Koch; Zeenat Hoosen; Humphrey Mulenga; Angelique K K Luabeya; Justin Shenje; Simon C Mendelsohn; Michele Tameris; Thomas J Scriba; Digby F Warner; Robin Wood; Jason R Andrews; Mark Hatherill Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Nathan N O'Hara; Lilla Roy; Lyndsay M O'Hara; Jerry M Spiegel; Larry D Lynd; J Mark FitzGerald; Annalee Yassi; Letshego E Nophale; Carlo A Marra Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Benjamin Patterson; Carl Morrow; Vinayak Singh; Atica Moosa; Melitta Gqada; Jeremy Woodward; Valerie Mizrahi; Wayne Bryden; Charles Call; Shwetak Patel; Digby Warner; Robin Wood Journal: Gates Open Res Date: 2018-06-08
Authors: Egide Kalisa; Stephen Archer; Edward Nagato; Elias Bizuru; Kevin Lee; Ning Tang; Stephen Pointing; Kazuichi Hayakawa; Donnabella Lacap-Bugler Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Annalee Yassi; Muzimkhulu Zungu; Jerry M Spiegel; Barry Kistnasamy; Karen Lockhart; David Jones; Lyndsay M O'Hara; Letshego Nophale; Elizabeth A Bryce; Lincoln Darwin Journal: Global Health Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 4.185
Authors: Robin Wood; Carl Morrow; Clifton E Barry; Wayne A Bryden; Charles J Call; Anthony J Hickey; Charles E Rodes; Thomas J Scriba; Jonathan Blackburn; Chacha Issarow; Nicola Mulder; Jeremy Woodward; Atica Moosa; Vinayak Singh; Valerie Mizrahi; Digby F Warner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240