| Literature DB >> 34698079 |
Kengo Kato1, Manami Ozaki2,3, Kumiko Nakai2,3, Maki Nagasaki1, Junya Nakajima1, Ryosuke Koshi2, Hideki Tanaka2,3, Takayuki Kawato2,3, Morio Tonogi1,4.
Abstract
Azithromycin displays immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects in addition to broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and is used to treat inflammatory diseases, including respiratory and odontogenic infections. Few studies have reported the effect of azithromycin therapy on bone remodeling processes. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of azithromycin on the osteogenic function of osteoblasts using osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells. Cells were cultured in the presence of 0, 0.1, 1, and 10 µg/mL azithromycin, and cell proliferation and alkaline phosphatase (ALPase) activity were determined. In vitro mineralized nodule formation was detected with alizarin red staining. The expression of collagenous and non-collagenous bone matrix protein was determined using real-time PCR or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. In cells cultured with 10 µg/mL azithromycin, the ALPase activity and mineralized nodule formation decreased, while the type I collagen, bone sialoprotein, osteocalcin, and osteopontin mRNA expression as well as osteopontin and phosphorylated osteopontin levels increased. These results suggest that a high azithromycin concentration (10 µg/mL) suppresses mineralized nodule formation by decreasing ALPase activity and increasing osteopontin production, whereas low concentrations (≤l.0 µg/mL) have no effect on osteogenic function in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells.Entities:
Keywords: MC3T3-E1 cells; azithromycin; mineralized nodule; osteoblast; osteopontin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34698079 PMCID: PMC8929154 DOI: 10.3390/cimb43030102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Issues Mol Biol ISSN: 1467-3037 Impact factor: 2.976
Figure 1Effect of azithromycin on osteoblast proliferation. MC3T3-E1 cells were untreated (vehicle control) or grown in the presence of variable azithromycin concentrations (0.1, 1, or 10 µg/mL) for 10 days. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01 compared with the control.
Figure 2Effect of azithromycin treatment on ALPase activity. MC3T3-E1 cells were untreated (vehicle control) or grown in the presence of variable azithromycin concentrations (0.1, 1, or 10 µg/mL) for 10 days. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001 compared with the control.
Figure 3Effect of azithromycin on mineralized nodule formation. MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with 0.1, 1, or 10 µg/mL azithromycin in the presence of osteogenic supplements (OS; 50 mM β-glycerophosphate and 50 µg/mL ascorbic acid) and 0.1% DMSO as a vehicle. Mineralized nodule formation was examined by alizarin red staining. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. NC, negative control. ### p < 0.001, ## p < 0.01, # p < 0.05 compared with negative control (NC); ††† p < 0.001, †† p < 0.01, † p < 0.05 compared with control; *** p < 0.001 compared with the vehicle control.
Figure 4Effect of azithromycin on (a) osteopontin, (b) osteocalcin, (c) bone sialoprotein, and (d) type I collagen mRNA expression determined by real-time PCR following 7- and 10-day culture. MC3T3-E1 cells were untreated (vehicle control) or grown in the presence of variable azithromycin concentrations (0.1, 1, or 10 µg/mL). The expression level of each gene was calculated and expressed as a ratio to the expression level in cells without azithromycin and DMSO treatment on the day when cells were seeded (T0). Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p <0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with the vehicle control on each day of culture.
Figure 5Effect of azithromycin on osteopontin levels. MC3T3-E1 cells were untreated (vehicle control) or grown in the presence of variable azithromycin concentrations as stated in the legend. The levels of (a) osteopontin in the supernatant and (b) phosphorylated osteopontin in the phosphoprotein-purified supernatant were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays 7 and 10 days after treatment. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared with the vehicle control.