Literature DB >> 34697960

Non-agreement between 2 serologic techniques for detecting antibody to Brucella ovis in naturally infected sheep.

José V P Barreto1, Patrícia A M Oliveira1, Simone F N Pertile1, Maria C R Sbizera1, Fabiola C A Rego1, Gustavo R Queiroz1, Luiz F C Cunha Filho1.   

Abstract

Brucella ovis is the causative agent of ovine brucellosis, which is an important infectious disease in sheep farming worldwide and is responsible for economic losses because of its negative effect on the reproductive system of rams and ewes. Serologic tests are the main tools for detection of infection; however, these tests commonly yield a high frequency of false-negative results. We compared 2 serologic tests, agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) and ELISA, for the detection of anti-B. ovis antibodies in naturally infected sheep. Of the 728 serum samples analyzed, 0.3% were positive by AGID and 9.2% by ELISA. Positive results were obtained for different animals and flocks. There was no statistical difference between the detection frequency of the 2 methods (p = 0.674), and the kappa test indicated low concordance (κ = 0.005). The lack of agreement between results obtained using AGID and ELISA, associated with the absence of clinical signs, makes it difficult to detect ovine brucellosis efficiently, and demonstrates the need for effective tests for the definitive detection of B. ovis infection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brucella ovis; serologic tests; sheep

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34697960      PMCID: PMC8689018          DOI: 10.1177/10406387211053589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  7 in total

1.  Factors associated with failure in breeding soundness examination of Western USA rams.

Authors:  David C Van Metre; Sangeeta Rao; Cleon V Kimberling; Paul S Morley
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Pathogenesis and pathobiology of brucellosis in livestock.

Authors:  F P Poester; L E Samartino; R L Santos
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.181

3.  Comparison of three serological tests for Brucella ovis infection of rams using different antigenic extracts.

Authors:  C M Marín; M P Jiménez de Bagués; J M Blasco; C Gamazo; I Moriyón; R Díaz
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1989-11-11       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Epidemiological and serological survey of brucellosis in Mongolia by ELISA using sarcosine extracts.

Authors:  Janchivdorj Erdenebaatar; Balgan Bayarsaikhan; Agchbazar Yondondorj; Masahisa Watarai; Toshikazu Shirahata; Enkhtuya Jargalsaikhan; Keiko Kawamoto; Sou-ichi Makino
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.955

5.  Comparison of 2 ELISAs for detecting exposure to Brucella ovis.

Authors:  Molly J Elderbrook; Brant A Schumaker; Massaro W Ueti; Meila Bastos de Almeida; Thallitha S W J Vieira; Rafael F C Vieira; Kerry S Sondgeroth
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 1.279

6.  Assessment of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of an indirect ELISA kit for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in rams.

Authors:  Anne Praud; Jean-Luc Champion; Yannick Corde; Antoine Drapeau; Laurence Meyer; Bruno Garin-Bastuji
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Seroprevalence and risk factors of Brucella ovis in domestic sheep in Wyoming, USA.

Authors:  Molly Elderbrook; Brant Schumaker; Todd Cornish; Dannele Peck; Kerry Sondgeroth
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.741

  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Rossetti; Estefanía Maurizio; Ursula Amaranta Rossi
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.