Literature DB >> 32748706

Comparison of 2 ELISAs for detecting exposure to Brucella ovis.

Molly J Elderbrook1, Brant A Schumaker1, Massaro W Ueti1, Meila Bastos de Almeida1, Thallitha S W J Vieira1, Rafael F C Vieira1, Kerry S Sondgeroth1.   

Abstract

Control of Brucella ovis infection in sheep flocks in the United States depends on early detection of B. ovis antibodies via serologic testing. We used 2,276 sheep sera and various cutoff values to compare seroprevalence and agreement between 2 ELISAs: the National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) B. ovis indirect ELISA and the IDEXX B. ovis ELISA kit. A subset of 295 sera was used to compare agreement and evaluate relative sensitivity and specificity of the 2 ELISAs with an agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) test kit. There was no significant difference in B. ovis seroprevalence between the ELISAs; however, there was poor agreement between them. When the AGID test was used as the reference test, the IDEXX ELISA with a moderate cutoff value (S/P ratio = 45%) had the highest relative sensitivity of 38.1% and specificity of 92.0%. The NVSL ELISA with a lax cutoff value (S/P ratio = 0.75) had relative sensitivity of 19.1% and specificity of 94.6%. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that optimal cutoff values for the NVSL and IDEXX ELISAs were 0.091 and 16.5%, respectively. This results in sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 31.8% for the NVSL ELISA, and sensitivity and specificity of 81.0% and 53.6% for the IDEXX ELISA, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brucella ovis; ELISA; agar gel immunodiffusion; ram epididymitis; sheep

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32748706      PMCID: PMC7488971          DOI: 10.1177/1040638720943880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of serologic testing of rams in the management of Brucella ovis in a domestic sheep flock.

Authors:  Lindsey A Branscom; Todd E Cornish; Kerry S Sondgeroth
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 1.279

2.  Studies of antigens for complement fixation and gel diffusion tests in the diagnosis of infections caused by Brucella ovis and other Brucella.

Authors:  D M Myers; L M Jones; V M Varela-Diaz
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-05

3.  Assessment of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of an indirect ELISA kit for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in rams.

Authors:  Anne Praud; Jean-Luc Champion; Yannick Corde; Antoine Drapeau; Laurence Meyer; Bruno Garin-Bastuji
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Seroprevalence and risk factors of Brucella ovis in domestic sheep in Wyoming, USA.

Authors:  Molly Elderbrook; Brant Schumaker; Todd Cornish; Dannele Peck; Kerry Sondgeroth
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.741

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Non-agreement between 2 serologic techniques for detecting antibody to Brucella ovis in naturally infected sheep.

Authors:  José V P Barreto; Patrícia A M Oliveira; Simone F N Pertile; Maria C R Sbizera; Fabiola C A Rego; Gustavo R Queiroz; Luiz F C Cunha Filho
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 1.279

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.