Literature DB >> 34697093

Brainstem Mechanisms of Pain Modulation: A within-Subjects 7T fMRI Study of Placebo Analgesic and Nocebo Hyperalgesic Responses.

Lewis S Crawford1, Emily P Mills1, Theo Hanson1, Paul M Macey2, Rebecca Glarin3, Vaughan G Macefield4,5, Kevin A Keay1, Luke A Henderson6.   

Abstract

Pain perception can be powerfully influenced by an individual's expectations and beliefs. Although the cortical circuitry responsible for pain modulation has been thoroughly investigated, the brainstem pathways involved in the modulatory phenomena of placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia remain to be directly addressed. This study used ultra-high-field 7 tesla functional MRI (fMRI) to accurately resolve differences in brainstem circuitry present during the generation of placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia in healthy human participants (N = 25, 12 male). Over 2 successive days, through blinded application of altered thermal stimuli, participants were deceptively conditioned to believe that two inert creams labeled lidocaine (placebo) and capsaicin (nocebo) were acting to modulate their pain relative to a third Vaseline (control) cream. In a subsequent test phase, fMRI image sets were collected while participants were given identical noxious stimuli to all three cream sites. Pain intensity ratings were collected and placebo and nocebo responses determined. Brainstem-specific fMRI analysis revealed altered activity in key pain modulatory nuclei, including a disparate recruitment of the periaqueductal gray (PAG)-rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) pathway when both greater placebo and nocebo effects were observed. Additionally, we found that placebo and nocebo responses differentially activated the parabrachial nucleus but overlapped in engagement of the substantia nigra and locus coeruleus. These data reveal that placebo and nocebo effects are generated through differential engagement of the PAG-RVM pathway, which in concert with other brainstem sites likely influences the experience of pain by modulating activity at the level of the dorsal horn.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Understanding endogenous pain modulatory mechanisms would support development of effective clinical treatment strategies for both acute and chronic pain. Specific brainstem nuclei have long been known to play a central role in nociceptive modulation; however, because of the small size and complex organization of the nuclei, previous neuroimaging efforts have been limited in directly identifying how these subcortical networks interact during the development of antinociceptive and pro-nociceptive effects. We used ultra-high-field fMRI to resolve brainstem structures and measure signal change during placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia. We define overlapping and disparate brainstem circuitry responsible for altering pain perception. These findings extend our understanding of the detailed organization and function of discrete brainstem nuclei involved in pain processing and modulation.
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  analgesia; hyperalgesia; nocebo; nociception; pain modulation; placebo

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34697093      PMCID: PMC8612641          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0806-21.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  94 in total

1.  Transneuronal labeling of a nociceptive pathway, the spino-(trigemino-)parabrachio-amygdaloid, in the rat.

Authors:  L Jasmin; A R Burkey; J P Card; A I Basbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A spatially unbiased atlas template of the human cerebellum.

Authors:  Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  The cerebral signature for pain perception and its modulation.

Authors:  Irene Tracey; Patrick W Mantyh
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Placebo and nocebo effects: a complex interplay between psychological factors and neurochemical networks.

Authors:  Elisa Frisaldi; Alessandro Piedimonte; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Am J Clin Hypn       Date:  2015-01

5.  Conditioned response models of placebo phenomena: further support.

Authors:  N J Voudouris; C L Peck; G Coleman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Influence of the method of drug administration on analgesic response.

Authors:  J D Levine; N C Gordon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Dec 20-1985 Jan 2       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Partial antagonism of placebo analgesia by naloxone.

Authors:  Priscilla Grevert; Leonard H Albert; Avram Goldstein
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 8.  Getting formal with dopamine and reward.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Distinct neural representations of placebo and nocebo effects.

Authors:  Sonya Freeman; Rongjun Yu; Natalia Egorova; Xiaoyan Chen; Irving Kirsch; Brian Claggett; Ted J Kaptchuk; Randy L Gollub; Jian Kong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  How Classical Conditioning Shapes Placebo Analgesia: Hidden versus Open Conditioning.

Authors:  Przemyslaw Babel; Waclaw Adamczyk; Karolina Swider; Elzbieta A Bajcar; Pawel Kicman; Natalia Lisinska
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.750

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Shifting the Balance: How Top-Down and Bottom-Up Input Modulate Pain via the Rostral Ventromedial Medulla.

Authors:  Qiliang Chen; Mary M Heinricher
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-28

2.  Parabrachial Projections to PAG-RVM Axis May Promote Placebo Hypoalgesia and Nocebo Hyperalgesia.

Authors:  Julio A Yanes; Titilola Akintola
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 3.  Toward Composite Pain Biomarkers of Neuropathic Pain-Focus on Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Monica M Diaz; Jacob Caylor; Irina Strigo; Imanuel Lerman; Brook Henry; Eduardo Lopez; Mark S Wallace; Ronald J Ellis; Alan N Simmons; John R Keltner
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 4.  Placebo: a brief updated review.

Authors:  Alfredo Jose Pardo-Cabello; Victoria Manzano-Gamero; Emilio Puche-Cañas
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.195

5.  Expectations: How and when do they contribute to placebo analgesia?

Authors:  Sophie Rosenkjær; Sigrid Juhl Lunde; Irving Kirsch; Lene Vase
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.435

6.  Sex differences in morphine sensitivity are associated with differential glial expression in the brainstem of rats with neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Damien C Boorman; Kevin A Keay
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.433

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.