Literature DB >> 25776211

Distinct neural representations of placebo and nocebo effects.

Sonya Freeman1, Rongjun Yu2, Natalia Egorova1, Xiaoyan Chen1, Irving Kirsch3, Brian Claggett4, Ted J Kaptchuk3, Randy L Gollub1, Jian Kong5.   

Abstract

Expectations shape the way we experience the world. In this study, we used fMRI to investigate how positive and negative expectation can change pain experiences in the same cohort of subjects. We first manipulated subjects' treatment expectation of the effectiveness of three inert creams, with one cream labeled "Lidocaine" (positive expectancy), one labeled "Capsaicin" (negative expectancy) and one labeled "Neutral" by surreptitiously decreasing, increasing, or not changing respectively, the intensity of the noxious stimuli administered following cream application. We then used fMRI to investigate the signal changes associated with administration of identical pain stimuli before and after the treatment and control creams. Twenty-four healthy adults completed the study. Results showed that expectancy significantly modulated subjective pain ratings. After controlling for changes in the neutral condition, the subjective pain rating changes evoked by positive and negative expectancies were significantly associated. fMRI results showed that the expectation of an increase in pain induced significant fMRI signal changes in the insula, orbitofrontal cortex, and periaqueductal gray, whereas the expectation of pain relief evoked significant fMRI signal changes in the striatum. No brain regions were identified as common to both "Capsaicin" and "Lidocaine" conditioning. There was also no significant association between the brain response to identical noxious stimuli in the pain matrix evoked by positive and negative expectancies. Our findings suggest that positive and negative expectancies engage different brain networks to modulate our pain experiences, but, overall, these distinct patterns of neural activation result in a correlated placebo and nocebo behavioral response.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Expectancy; Negative expectancy; Nocebo; Pain; Placebo; Positive expectancy; fMRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25776211      PMCID: PMC4408248          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  75 in total

1.  Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of brain correlates of placebo analgesia in human experimental pain.

Authors:  Martina Amanzio; Fabrizio Benedetti; Carlo A Porro; Sara Palermo; Franco Cauda
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neural mechanisms mediating positive and negative treatment expectations in visceral pain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study on placebo and nocebo effects in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Julia Schmid; Nina Theysohn; Florian Ga; Sven Benson; Carolin Gramsch; Michael Forsting; Elke R Gizewski; Sigrid Elsenbruch
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Altered placebo and drug labeling changes the outcome of episodic migraine attacks.

Authors:  Slavenka Kam-Hansen; Moshe Jakubowski; John M Kelley; Irving Kirsch; David C Hoaglin; Ted J Kaptchuk; Rami Burstein
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 4.  Placebo analgesia: a predictive coding perspective.

Authors:  Christian Büchel; Stephan Geuter; Christian Sprenger; Falk Eippert
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Pain modulation: expectation, opioid analgesia and virtual pain.

Authors:  H L Fields
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Z Di Blasi; E Harkness; E Ernst; A Georgiou; J Kleijnen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-03-10       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Nocebo and placebo modulation of hypobaric hypoxia headache involves the cyclooxygenase-prostaglandins pathway.

Authors:  Fabrizio Benedetti; Jennifer Durando; Sergio Vighetti
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Functional connectivity of the frontoparietal network predicts cognitive modulation of pain.

Authors:  Jian Kong; Karin Jensen; Rita Loiotile; Alexandra Cheetham; Hsiao-Ying Wey; Ying Tan; Bruce Rosen; Jordan W Smoller; Ted J Kaptchuk; Randy L Gollub
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Facilitation of pain in the human spinal cord by nocebo treatment.

Authors:  Stephan Geuter; Christian Büchel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  An fMRI-based neurologic signature of physical pain.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Lauren Y Atlas; Martin A Lindquist; Mathieu Roy; Choong-Wan Woo; Ethan Kross
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  32 in total

1.  Applying the Power of the Mind in Acupuncture Treatment of Pain.

Authors:  Jian Kong; Maya Nicole Eshel
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2020-12-16

2.  The altered right frontoparietal network functional connectivity in migraine and the modulation effect of treatment.

Authors:  Zhengjie Li; Lei Lan; Fang Zeng; Nikos Makris; Jiwon Hwang; Taipin Guo; Feng Wu; Yujie Gao; Mingkai Dong; Mailan Liu; Jie Yang; Ying Li; Qiyong Gong; Sharon Sun; Fanrong Liang; Jian Kong
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 6.292

3.  Analgesic Effects Evoked by Real and Imagined Acupuncture: A Neuroimaging Study.

Authors:  Jin Cao; Yiheng Tu; Scott P Orr; Courtney Lang; Joel Park; Mark Vangel; Lucy Chen; Randy Gollub; Jian Kong
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Between placebo and nocebo: Response to control treatment is mediated by amygdala activity and connectivity.

Authors:  Natalia Egorova; Fabrizio Benedetti; Randy L Gollub; Jian Kong
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.931

5.  Effects of Positive and Negative Expectations on Human Pain Perception Engage Separate But Interrelated and Dependently Regulated Cerebral Mechanisms.

Authors:  Yao-Wei Shih; Hsin-Yun Tsai; Feng-Sheng Lin; Yi-Hsuan Lin; Chun-Yen Chiang; Zheng-Liang Lu; Ming-Tsung Tseng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  [Biosimilars and the nocebo effect].

Authors:  J Braun; S Tsiami; B Buehring; D Kiefer; I Andreica; X Baraliakos; U Kiltz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Placebo Effects on the Neurologic Pain Signature: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.

Authors:  Matthias Zunhammer; Ulrike Bingel; Tor D Wager
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 18.302

8.  The imagined itch: brain circuitry supporting nocebo-induced itch in atopic dermatitis patients.

Authors:  V Napadow; A Li; M L Loggia; J Kim; I Mawla; G Desbordes; P C Schalock; E A Lerner; T N Tran; J Ring; B R Rosen; T J Kaptchuk; F Pfab
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 13.146

9.  A neural mechanism of direct and observational conditioning for placebo and nocebo responses.

Authors:  Yiheng Tu; Joel Park; Seppo P Ahlfors; Sheraz Khan; Natalia Egorova; Courtney Lang; Jin Cao; Jian Kong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Manipulating placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia by changing brain excitability.

Authors:  Yiheng Tu; Georgia Wilson; Joan Camprodon; Darin D Dougherty; Mark Vangel; Fabrizio Benedetti; Ted J Kaptchuk; Randy L Gollub; Jian Kong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.