| Literature DB >> 34695294 |
Maria Ehsan1, Naveed Iqbal Raja1, Zia-Ur-Rehman Mashwani1, Muhammad Ikram1, Efat Zohra1, Syeda Sadaf Zehra2, Fozia Abasi1, Mubashir Hussain1, Muhammad Iqbal1, Nilofar Mustafa1, Asad Ali1.
Abstract
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the most important staple food crop globally. According to economic survey 2018-19, agriculture sector of Pakistan grew by 0.85%, with wheat accounting for 8.9% of agriculture and 1.6% of GDP, and its production fell short of the target by 4.9%. Wheat requires beneficial ties to improve its efficiency with the help of modern technology. Nanotechnology modifies conventional agricultural practices as these are stimulating agents for plant growth. Green bimetallic Ag/ZnO alloy nanoparticles (NPs) synthesised from salts reduced by Moringa oleifera and characterised by UV-visible spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy are studied herein. Different concentrations of urea and Ag/ZnO alloy NPs were applied exogenously to wheat plants (Pakistan-13 and Galaxy13). A significant effect of 100 mg/L urea and 75 ppm Ag/ZnO alloy NPs was observed on the morphology of wheat, with a maximum increase of 58% plant length, 85% leaf area, 89% plant fresh weight and 76% plant dried weight. In physiological parameters, relative water content and membrane stability index have shown maximum increases of 39% and 77%, while chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll content (TCC) showed maximum increases of 92%, 71%, and 84% respectively. Evidence of the morpho-physiological responses of urea and green synthesised alloy NPs on wheat varieties are reported on.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34695294 PMCID: PMC8675799 DOI: 10.1049/nbt2.12048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IET Nanobiotechnol ISSN: 1751-8741 Impact factor: 2.050
FIGURE 1Aqueous leaf extract of Moringa oleifera
FIGURE 2Ag/ZnO alloy nanoparticles: (a) solution form; (b) powder form
The layout of the experiment with details of the different concentrations of NPs and urea
| Treatments | |
|---|---|
| T0 | Control |
| T1 | Urea (50 mg/L) + NPs (25 ppm) |
| T2 | Urea (50 mg/L) + NPs (50 ppm) |
| T3 | Urea (50 mg/L) + NPs (75 ppm) |
| T4 | Urea (50 mg/L) + NPs (100 ppm) |
| T5 | Urea (100 mg/L) + NPs (25 ppm) |
| T6 | Urea (100 mg/L) + NPs (50 ppm) |
| T7 | Urea (100 mg/L) + NPs (75 ppm) |
| T8 | Urea (100 mg/L) + NPs (100 ppm) |
Abbreviation: NPs, nanoparticles.
FIGURE 3UV‐visible spectrum: (a) ZnO NPs; (b) Ag/ZnO alloy NPs. NPs, nanparticles
FIGURE 4Scanning electron microscopy micrograph of the green synthesised Ag/ZnO nanoparticles
FIGURE 5Energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy spectrum of green synthesised Ag/ZnO nanoparticles
FIGURE 6Length of wheat plants in response to different treatments
FIGURE 7Leaf area in response to different treatments
FIGURE 8Plant fresh weight in response to different treatments
FIGURE 9Plant dry weight in response to different treatments
FIGURE 10Relative water content and membrane stability index in response to different treatments
FIGURE 11Chlorophyll a and b contents in response to different treatments
FIGURE 12Total chlorophyll content in response to different treatments