Literature DB >> 34694831

Addressing heterogeneous populations in latent variable settings through robust estimation.

Kenneth J Nieser1, Amy L Cochran1.   

Abstract

Individuals routinely differ in how they present with psychiatric illnesses and in how they respond to treatment. This heterogeneity, when overlooked in data analysis, can lead to misspecified models and distorted inferences. While several methods exist to handle various forms of heterogeneity in latent variable models, their implementation in applied research requires additional layers of model crafting, which might be a reason for their underutilization. In response, we present a robust estimation approach based on the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. Our method makes minor adjustments to EM to enable automatic detection of population heterogeneity and to recognize individuals who are inadequately explained by the assumed model. Each individual is associated with a probability that reflects how likely their data were to have been generated from the assumed model. The individual-level probabilities are simultaneously estimated and used to weight each individual's contribution in parameter estimation. We examine the utility of our approach for Gaussian mixture models and linear factor models through several simulation studies, drawing contrasts with the EM algorithm. We demonstrate that our method yields inferences more robust to population heterogeneity or other model misspecifications than EM does. We hope that the proposed approach can be incorporated into the model-building process to improve population-level estimates and to shed light on subsets of the population that demand further attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34694831      PMCID: PMC9035483          DOI: 10.1037/met0000413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  26 in total

1.  Identifying careless responses in survey data.

Authors:  Adam W Meade; S Bartholomew Craig
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-04-16

Review 2.  Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).

Authors:  Scott I Vrieze
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-02-06

3.  Detecting Outliers in Factor Analysis Using the Forward Search Algorithm.

Authors:  Dimitris Mavridis; Irini Moustaki
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  How many different ways do patients meet the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder?

Authors:  Mark Zimmerman; William Ellison; Diane Young; Iwona Chelminski; Kristy Dalrymple
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.735

Review 5.  A review of neuroimaging studies in PTSD: heterogeneity of response to symptom provocation.

Authors:  R A Lanius; R Bluhm; U Lanius; C Pain
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  Deconstructing major depression: a validation study of the DSM-IV symptomatic criteria.

Authors:  V Lux; K S Kendler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 7.723

7.  Psychometric approaches for developing commensurate measures across independent studies: traditional and new models.

Authors:  Daniel J Bauer; Andrea M Hussong
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-06

8.  Models and Strategies for Factor Mixture Analysis: An Example Concerning the Structure Underlying Psychological Disorders.

Authors:  Shaunna L Clark; Bengt Muthén; Jaakko Kaprio; Brian M D'Onofrio; Richard Viken; Richard J Rose
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 6.125

Review 9.  Epidemiologic heterogeneity of common mood and anxiety disorders over the lifecourse in the general population: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arijit Nandi; John R Beard; Sandro Galea
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 10.  Sex differences in antidepressant efficacy.

Authors:  Tara A LeGates; Mark D Kvarta; Scott M Thompson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.