Literature DB >> 34694498

Coccygectomy for refractory coccygodynia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Navraj S Sagoo1, Ali S Haider2, Paolo Palmisciano3, Christopher Vannabouathong1, Roberto Gonzalez1, Andrew L Chen4, Nidhish Lokesh1, Neha Sharma5, Kylan Larsen1, Ravinderjit Singh1, Neha Mulpuri1, Kevin Rezzadeh6, Christie Caldwell1, Lori A Tappen1, Kevin Gill1, Shaleen Vira7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to systematically assess and summarize the available literature on outcomes following coccygectomy for refractory coccygodynia.
METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data concerning patient demographics, validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for pain relief, disability outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates were extracted and analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 21 studies (18 retrospective and 3 prospective) were included in the quantitative analysis. A total of 826 patients (females = 75%) received coccygectomy (720 total and 106 partial) for refractory coccygodynia. Trauma was reported as the most common etiology of coccygodynia (56%; n = 375), followed by idiopathic causes (33%; n = 221). The pooled mean difference (MD) in pain scores from baseline on a 0-10 scale was 5.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.35 to 6.86) at a 6-12 month follow-up (FU); 5.02 (95% CI: 3.47 to 6.57) at > 12-36 months FU; and 5.41 (95% CI: 4.33 to 6.48) at > 36 months FU. The MCID threshold for pain relief was surpassed at each follow-up. Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly improved postoperatively, with a pooled MD from baseline of - 23.49 (95% CI: - 31.51 to - 15.46), surpassing the MCID threshold. The pooled incidence of complications following coccygectomy was 8% (95% CI: 5% to 12%), the most frequent of which were surgical site infections and wound dehiscence. The pooled incidence of reoperations was 3% (95% CI: 1% to 5%).
CONCLUSION: Coccygectomy represents a viable treatment option in patients with refractory coccygodynia.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coccygeal resection; Coccygectomy; Coccygodynia; Coccyx

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34694498     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-07041-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  30 in total

1.  COCCYGODYNIA: CAUSE AND TREATMENT.

Authors:  G H THIELE
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1963 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  Coccydynia: an overview of the anatomy, etiology, and treatment of coccyx pain.

Authors:  Lesley Smallwood Lirette; Gassan Chaiban; Reda Tolba; Hazem Eissa
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

3.  Low back and rectal pain from an orthopedic and proctologic viewpoint; with a review of 180 cases.

Authors:  S SCHAPIRO
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Surgical treatment of coccygodynia: an analytic review of the literature.

Authors:  Efthimios J Karadimas; Gregory Trypsiannis; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The efficacy of coccygectomy in patients with persistent coccydynia.

Authors:  Stefan Milosevic; Gustav Ø Andersen; Mads M Jensen; Mikkel M Rasmussen; Leah Carreon; Mikkel Ø Andersen; Ane Simony
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Eugene J Carragee; Ivan Cheng
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 7.  A Review of Current Treatment Options for Coccygodynia.

Authors:  Yasmin Elkhashab; Andrew Ng
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-03-19

8.  Coccygectomy for coccygodynia: a cohort study with a long-term follow-up of up to 29 years.

Authors:  R Hochgatterer; M Gahleitner; J Allerstorfer; J Maier; M Luger; G Großbötzl; T Gotterbarm; L Pisecky
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Coccygectomy as a surgical option in the treatment of chronic traumatic coccygodynia: a single-center experience and literature review.

Authors:  Alexander Antoniadis; Nils Harry-Bert Ulrich; Hueseyin Senyurt
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-12-17

10.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Patrick M Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy C Hoffmann; Cynthia D Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Elie A Akl; Sue E Brennan; Roger Chou; Julie Glanville; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Manoj M Lalu; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth W Loder; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Steve McDonald; Luke A McGuinness; Lesley A Stewart; James Thomas; Andrea C Tricco; Vivian A Welch; Penny Whiting; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-03-29
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the Optimal Management of Inoperable Giant Cell Tumors of the Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Palmisciano; Gianluca Ferini; Andrew L Chen; Kishore Balasubramanian; Abdurrahman F Kharbat; Navraj S Sagoo; Othman Bin Alamer; Gianluca Scalia; Giuseppe E Umana; Salah G Aoun; Ali S Haider
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.