| Literature DB >> 34691481 |
Jin-Jing Li1,2, Xiang Lin1,2, Cheng Tang3, Ying-Qian Lu1, Xinde Hu3, Erwei Zuo3, He Li3, Wenqin Ying3, Yidi Sun4, Lu-Lu Lai1, Hai-Zhu Chen1, Xin-Xin Guo1, Qi-Jie Zhang1,2, Shuang Wu1, Changyang Zhou3, Xiaowen Shen3, Qifang Wang3, Min-Ting Lin1,2, Li-Xiang Ma5, Ning Wang1,2, Adrian R Krainer6, Linyu Shi3, Hui Yang3, Wan-Jin Chen1,2.
Abstract
We here report a genome-editing strategy to correct spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Rather than directly targeting the pathogenic exonic mutations, our strategy employed Cas9 and guide-sgRNA for the targeted disruption of intronic splicing-regulatory elements. We disrupted intronic splicing silencers (ISSs, including ISS-N1 and ISS + 100) of survival motor neuron (SMN) 2, a key modifier gene of SMA, to enhance exon 7 inclusion and full-length SMN expression in SMA iPSCs. Survival of splicing-corrected iPSC-derived motor neurons was rescued with SMN restoration. Furthermore, co-injection of Cas9 mRNA from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) or Cas9 from Staphylococcus aureus (SaCas9) alongside their corresponding sgRNAs targeting ISS-N1 into zygotes rescued 56% and 100% of severe SMA transgenic mice (Smn -/-, SMN2 tg/-). The median survival of the resulting mice was extended to >400 days. Collectively, our study provides proof-of-principle for a new strategy to therapeutically intervene in SMA and other RNA-splicing-related diseases.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; SMN2; germline correction; spinal muscular atrophy; splicing-regulatory elements
Year: 2019 PMID: 34691481 PMCID: PMC8446915 DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwz131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Natl Sci Rev ISSN: 2053-714X Impact factor: 17.275
Figure 1.Alternative splicing is modulated in ISS-N1 and ISS + 100 disrupted SMA iPSCs and motor neurons. (A) Schematic of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated disruption of ISS-N1 and ISS + 100 in intron 7 of SMN2. (B) NHEJ and splicing-modulation efficiencies by targeting ISS-N1 and ISS + 100. (C) Alignments of corrected sequences from SMA iPSCs with Cas9-sgRNA-mediated disruption at the ISS-N1 and ISS + 100 loci. The deletions are indicated by a red dashed line. Blue lines indicate the two core motif sequences (CAG and AAAG) of ISS-N1. The column on the right indicates the percent of the relevant genotype in total sequencing reads. (D) RT-PCR analysis of SMN2 mRNA in SMA patient-derived iPSCs. The SC-SMA iPSCs were evaluated at passages (p) 10 and 30. Incl% = (FL /(FL + Δ7)) × 100. (E) RT-PCR analysis of SMN2 mRNA in iPSCs. The ASO-treated SMA-2 iPSCs were assessed at p1(Day (D) 1), p1(D5), p2 and p5. (F) Nuclear Gemini body localization in motor neurons co-stained with SMN and HB9 antibodies. Gemini bodies are indicated by arrows. Scale bar, 10 μm. (G) Quantification of SMN+ Gemini bodies in HB9+ MNs at Day 13; n = 3, with about 100 cells examined per group. (H) MNs were treated with DMSO or 40 μM tunicamycin for 38 h. HB9 was used to mark surviving MNs, counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar, 100 μm. (I) Quantification (ratio of surviving MNs to total cells) of cell viability after tunicamycin treatment; cell viability was increased in SC-SMA-iPSCs-derived MNs; n = 3. (J) Treated MNs were assayed with TUNEL to mark apoptotic cells. Scale bar, 100 μm. (K) Quantification of dead MNs to total cells after tunicamycin treatment. The extent of MN apoptosis was reduced in SC-SMA-iPSCs-derived MNs; n = 3. Error bars indicate means ± SDs. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; one-way ANOVA.
Figure 2.Disruption of ISS-N1 alleviated SMA-associated phenotypes in splicing-corrected SMA mice. (A) Strategy of the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated disruption of ISS-N1 in SMA mice via germline gene therapy. (B) NHEJ and survival efficiencies in SC-SMA mice. (C) Kaplan–Meier survival curves for SC-Sp-SMA mice edited by SpCas9-sgRNA (n = 10), SMA mice (n = 35), heterozygous (HET) mice (n = 10) and SC-HET mice (n = 10). (D) Body weight was assessed from P6 to P48 for SMA (n = 15), SC-Sp-SMA (n = 20), HET (n = 8) and SC-HET (n = 19) mice. (E) Two SC-Sp-SMA mice were similarly sized with their heterozygous littermates. (F) RT-PCR analysis of SMN2 mRNA in multiple tissues from SMA and SC-Sp-SMA mice. (G) Immunoblot analysis of SMN protein in spinal-cord and brain samples from SMA and SC-Sp-SMA mice. (H) Kaplan–Meier survival curves for SC-Sa-SMA mice disrupted by SaCas9-sgRNA (n = 7) and SC-HET mice (n = 12). Data from SMA mice were the same as in (C). (I) Body weight was assessed from P5 to P59 for SC-Sa-SMA (n = 7) and SC-HET (n = 12) mice. Data from SMA mice were the same as in (D). (J) RT-PCR analysis of SMN2 mRNA in multiple tissues from SMA and SC-Sa-SMA mice. (K) Editing efficiency in different organs of the edited mice (lifespan >400 days). Wild-type (WT) reads without mutations are represented by orange bars; mutant reads of ISS-N1 are represented by blue bars. Mut, mutant. Error bars indicate means ± SDs.
Figure 3.SMN restoration alleviates spinal MN degeneration and NMJ denervation in SC-Sp-SMA mice. (A) Nuclear Gemini bodies localization in spinal-cord L1–L2 motor neurons was determined by co-staining with SMN and ChAT antibodies. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Gemini bodies are indicated by arrows. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) and (C) Quantification of Gemini bodies per 100 motor neurons (B) and percentage of motor neurons containing zero, one, two, three, four or more Gemini bodies (C) in SMA (n = 3), SC-Sp-SMA (n = 6) and SC-HET (n = 3) mice. (D) Representative images of spinal-cord L1–L2 ventral-horn ChAT+ MNs (red) in the above three groups. Scale bar, 100 μm. (E) MNs labeled in (D) were counted. SMA (n = 6), SC-Sp-SMA (n = 5) and SC-HET (n = 6). (F) Quantification of the innervated NMJs in SMA (n = 3), SC-Sp-SMA (n = 5) and SC-HET (n = 4) mice. (G) Body weight was assessed from P5 to P59 for F1-SC-Sp-SMA (n = 9). Data from SMA mice and SC-HET were the same as in Figure 2 (I). (H) Statistical analysis of SMN2 mRNA in multiple tissues from SMA and F1-SC-Sp-SMA mice. Error bars indicate means ± SDs. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA.