Literature DB >> 34687722

Impact of chromosomal organization on epigenetic drift and domain stability revealed by physics-based simulations.

Joseph G Wakim1, Sarah H Sandholtz2, Andrew J Spakowitz3.   

Abstract

We examine the relationship between the size of domains of epigenetic marks and the stability of those domains using our theoretical model that captures the physical mechanisms governing the maintenance of epigenetic modifications. We focus our study on histone H3 lysine-9 trimethylation, one of the most common and consequential epigenetic marks with roles in chromatin compaction and gene repression. Our model combines the effects of methyl spreading by methyltransferases and chromatin segregation into heterochromatin and euchromatin because of preferential heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) binding. Our model indicates that, although large methylated domains are passed successfully from one chromatin generation to the next, small alterations to the methylation sequence are not maintained during chromatin replication. Using our predictive model, we investigate the size required for an epigenetic domain to persist over chromatin generations while surrounded by a much larger domain of opposite methylation and compaction state. We find that there is a critical size threshold in the hundreds-of-nucleosomes scale above which an epigenetic domain will be reliably maintained over generations. The precise size of the threshold differs for heterochromatic and euchromatic domains. Our results are consistent with natural alterations to the epigenetic sequence occurring during embryonic development and due to age-related epigenetic drift.
Copyright © 2021 Biophysical Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34687722      PMCID: PMC8633838          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  77 in total

Review 1.  Viewing Nuclear Architecture through the Eyes of Nocturnal Mammals.

Authors:  Yana Feodorova; Martin Falk; Leonid A Mirny; Irina Solovei
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 20.808

2.  A fluorogenic array for temporally unlimited single-molecule tracking.

Authors:  Rajarshi P Ghosh; J Matthew Franklin; Will E Draper; Quanming Shi; Bruno Beltran; Andrew J Spakowitz; Jan T Liphardt
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 15.040

3.  Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins.

Authors:  M Lachner; D O'Carroll; S Rea; K Mechtler; T Jenuwein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Statistical mechanics model for the dynamics of collective epigenetic histone modification.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Xiao-Jun Tian; Abhishek Mukhopadhyay; K S Kim; Jianhua Xing
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Recruitment and biological consequences of histone modification of H3K27me3 and H3K9me3.

Authors:  Joomyeong Kim; Hana Kim
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2012

Review 6.  Connections between epigenetic gene silencing and human disease.

Authors:  Timothy J Moss; Lori L Wallrath
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-01-21       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Age-related changes of nuclear architecture in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Erin Haithcock; Yaron Dayani; Ester Neufeld; Adam J Zahand; Naomi Feinstein; Anna Mattout; Yosef Gruenbaum; Jun Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Proviral silencing in embryonic stem cells requires the histone methyltransferase ESET.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Matsui; Danny Leung; Hiroki Miyashita; Irina A Maksakova; Hitoshi Miyachi; Hiroshi Kimura; Makoto Tachibana; Matthew C Lorincz; Yoichi Shinkai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  H3K9me3-Dependent Heterochromatin: Barrier to Cell Fate Changes.

Authors:  Justin S Becker; Dario Nicetto; Kenneth S Zaret
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 10.  A brief review of short tandem repeat mutation.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Jia-You Chu
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.691

View more
  1 in total

1.  Painters in chromatin: a unified quantitative framework to systematically characterize epigenome regulation and memory.

Authors:  Amith Z Abdulla; Cédric Vaillant; Daniel Jost
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 19.160

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.