Literature DB >> 34687532

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Portion Size and Ingestive Frequency on Energy Intake and Body Weight among Adults in Randomized Controlled Feeding Trials.

Kelly A Higgins, Joshua L Hudson, Anna M R Hayes, Ethan Braun, Eunjin Cheon, Sam C Couture, Nilupa S Gunaratna, Erica R Hill, Stephanie R Hunter, Bethany S McGowan, Evan J Reister, Yu Wang, Richard D Mattes.   

Abstract

Energy intake is the product of portion size (PS)-the energy content of an ingestive event-and ingestive frequency (IF)-the number of ingestive events per unit time. An uncompensated alteration in either PS or IF would result in a change in energy intake and body weight if maintained over time. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the independent effects of PS and IF on energy intake and body weight among healthy adults in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A total of 9708 articles were identified in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases. The articles were divided among 10 researchers; each article was screened for eligibility by 2-3 independent reviewers. Exclusion criteria included: populations <19 y and >65 y, unhealthy populations (i.e. participants with an acute or chronic disease), assessments <24 h and <4 wk in duration for trials investigating energy intake or body weight, respectively. Controlled feeding trials (i.e. fixed energy intake) that manipulated IF and PS in the same study intervention (IF/PS) were evaluated separately and for the body weight outcome only. Twenty-two studies (IF = 4, PS = 14, IF/PS = 4) met the inclusion criteria. There was an insufficient number of studies to assess the effect of IF, PS, or IF/PS on body weight. There was heterogeneity in the effect sizes among all comparisons (I2 ≥75%). Consuming larger portion sizes was associated with higher daily energy intake [295 kcal (202, 388), n = 24; weighted mean differences (WMD) (95% CI), n = comparisons], and increased frequency of ingestive events was associated with higher energy intake [203 kcal (76, 330), n = 10]. Results from RCTs support that larger PS and greater IF are both associated with higher energy consumption. However, there is insufficient information to determine chronic effects on body weight. This protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) as CRD42018104757.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feeding pattern; food intake; healthy population; ingestive behavior; normal weight; obese; overweight; serving size

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34687532      PMCID: PMC8803498          DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmab112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   11.567


  53 in total

1.  Learning about the energy density of liquid and semi-solid foods.

Authors:  P S Hogenkamp; A Stafleu; M Mars; C de Graaf
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

Authors:  Miranda Cumpston; Tianjing Li; Matthew J Page; Jacqueline Chandler; Vivian A Welch; Julian Pt Higgins; James Thomas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-03

3.  Compared with nibbling, neither gorging nor a morning fast affect short-term energy balance in obese patients in a chamber calorimeter.

Authors:  M A Taylor; J S Garrow
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2001-04

4.  Larger portion sizes lead to a sustained increase in energy intake over 2 days.

Authors:  Barbara J Rolls; Liane S Roe; Jennifer S Meengs
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2006-04

5.  Bad popcorn in big buckets: portion size can influence intake as much as taste.

Authors:  Brian Wansink; Junyong Kim
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.045

6.  Components of postprandial thermogenesis in relation to meal frequency in humans.

Authors:  J LeBlanc; I Mercier; A Nadeau
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.273

7.  Food form and portion size affect postprandial appetite sensations and hormonal responses in healthy, nonobese, older adults.

Authors:  Heather J Leidy; John W Apolzan; Richard D Mattes; Wayne W Campbell
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Regular meal frequency creates more appropriate insulin sensitivity and lipid profiles compared with irregular meal frequency in healthy lean women.

Authors:  H R Farshchi; M A Taylor; I A Macdonald
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Effect of nibbling versus gorging on cardiovascular risk factors: serum uric acid and blood lipids.

Authors:  D J Jenkins; A Khan; A L Jenkins; R Illingworth; A S Pappu; T M Wolever; V Vuksan; G Buckley; A V Rao; S C Cunnane
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.694

10.  Lack of energy compensation over 4 days when white button mushrooms are substituted for beef.

Authors:  Lawrence J Cheskin; Lisa M Davis; Leah M Lipsky; Andrea H Mitola; Thomas Lycan; Vanessa Mitchell; Brooke Mickle; Emily Adkins
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.868

View more
  1 in total

1.  Investigating the Association between Unhealthy Dietary Habits and Obesity among Libyan Adults.

Authors:  Hamdi Lemamsha; Gurch Randhawa; Chris Papadopoulos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.