Literature DB >> 22143621

Learning about the energy density of liquid and semi-solid foods.

P S Hogenkamp1, A Stafleu, M Mars, C de Graaf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People learn about a food's satiating capacity by exposure and consequently adjust their energy intake.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of energy density and texture on subsequent energy intake adjustments during repeated consumption.
DESIGN: In a randomized crossover design, participants (n=27, age: 21±2.4 years, body mass index: 22.2±1.6 kg m(-2)) repeatedly consumed highly novel foods that were either low-energy-dense (LE: 30 kcal per 100 g) or high-energy-dense (HE: 130 kcal per 100 g), and either liquid or semi-solid, resulting in four product conditions. In each condition, a fixed portion of test food was consumed nine times as an obligatory part of breakfast, lunch and dinner on 3 consecutive days. All meals continued with an ad libitum buffet; food items for evening consumption were provided and the intake (kcal per day) was measured.
RESULTS: Buffet intake depended on energy density and day of consumption of the test foods (day*energy interaction: P=0.02); daily buffet intake increased from day 1 (1745±577 kcal) to day 3 (1979±567 kcal) in the LE conditions; intake did not change in the HE conditions (day 1: 1523±429 kcal, day 3: 1589±424 kcal). Food texture did not affect the intake (P=0.56).
CONCLUSIONS: Intake did depend on energy density of the test foods; participants increased their buffet intake over days in response to learning about the satiating capacity of the LE foods, but did not change buffet intake over days when repeatedly consuming a HE food as part of their meal. The adjustments in intake were made irrespective of the food texture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22143621     DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2011.231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-0565            Impact factor:   5.095


  5 in total

Review 1.  Energy density, energy intake, and body weight regulation in adults.

Authors:  J Philip Karl; Susan B Roberts
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Integration of Sweet Taste and Metabolism Determines Carbohydrate Reward.

Authors:  Maria Geraldine Veldhuizen; Richard Keith Babbs; Barkha Patel; Wambura Fobbs; Nils B Kroemer; Elizabeth Garcia; Martin R Yeomans; Dana M Small
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Portion Size and Ingestive Frequency on Energy Intake and Body Weight among Adults in Randomized Controlled Feeding Trials.

Authors:  Kelly A Higgins; Joshua L Hudson; Anna M R Hayes; Ethan Braun; Eunjin Cheon; Sam C Couture; Nilupa S Gunaratna; Erica R Hill; Stephanie R Hunter; Bethany S McGowan; Evan J Reister; Yu Wang; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 11.567

4.  Effect of replacing sugar with non-caloric sweeteners in beverages on the reward value after repeated exposure.

Authors:  Sanne Griffioen-Roose; Paul A M Smeets; Pascalle L G Weijzen; Inge van Rijn; Iris van den Bosch; Cees de Graaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies.

Authors:  P J Rogers; P S Hogenkamp; C de Graaf; S Higgs; A Lluch; A R Ness; C Penfold; R Perry; P Putz; M R Yeomans; D J Mela
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.095

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.