BACKGROUND: People learn about a food's satiating capacity by exposure and consequently adjust their energy intake. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of energy density and texture on subsequent energy intake adjustments during repeated consumption. DESIGN: In a randomized crossover design, participants (n=27, age: 21±2.4 years, body mass index: 22.2±1.6 kg m(-2)) repeatedly consumed highly novel foods that were either low-energy-dense (LE: 30 kcal per 100 g) or high-energy-dense (HE: 130 kcal per 100 g), and either liquid or semi-solid, resulting in four product conditions. In each condition, a fixed portion of test food was consumed nine times as an obligatory part of breakfast, lunch and dinner on 3 consecutive days. All meals continued with an ad libitum buffet; food items for evening consumption were provided and the intake (kcal per day) was measured. RESULTS: Buffet intake depended on energy density and day of consumption of the test foods (day*energy interaction: P=0.02); daily buffet intake increased from day 1 (1745±577 kcal) to day 3 (1979±567 kcal) in the LE conditions; intake did not change in the HE conditions (day 1: 1523±429 kcal, day 3: 1589±424 kcal). Food texture did not affect the intake (P=0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Intake did depend on energy density of the test foods; participants increased their buffet intake over days in response to learning about the satiating capacity of the LE foods, but did not change buffet intake over days when repeatedly consuming a HE food as part of their meal. The adjustments in intake were made irrespective of the food texture.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:People learn about a food's satiating capacity by exposure and consequently adjust their energy intake. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of energy density and texture on subsequent energy intake adjustments during repeated consumption. DESIGN: In a randomized crossover design, participants (n=27, age: 21±2.4 years, body mass index: 22.2±1.6 kg m(-2)) repeatedly consumed highly novel foods that were either low-energy-dense (LE: 30 kcal per 100 g) or high-energy-dense (HE: 130 kcal per 100 g), and either liquid or semi-solid, resulting in four product conditions. In each condition, a fixed portion of test food was consumed nine times as an obligatory part of breakfast, lunch and dinner on 3 consecutive days. All meals continued with an ad libitum buffet; food items for evening consumption were provided and the intake (kcal per day) was measured. RESULTS: Buffet intake depended on energy density and day of consumption of the test foods (day*energy interaction: P=0.02); daily buffet intake increased from day 1 (1745±577 kcal) to day 3 (1979±567 kcal) in the LE conditions; intake did not change in the HE conditions (day 1: 1523±429 kcal, day 3: 1589±424 kcal). Food texture did not affect the intake (P=0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Intake did depend on energy density of the test foods; participants increased their buffet intake over days in response to learning about the satiating capacity of the LE foods, but did not change buffet intake over days when repeatedly consuming a HE food as part of their meal. The adjustments in intake were made irrespective of the food texture.
Authors: Maria Geraldine Veldhuizen; Richard Keith Babbs; Barkha Patel; Wambura Fobbs; Nils B Kroemer; Elizabeth Garcia; Martin R Yeomans; Dana M Small Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Kelly A Higgins; Joshua L Hudson; Anna M R Hayes; Ethan Braun; Eunjin Cheon; Sam C Couture; Nilupa S Gunaratna; Erica R Hill; Stephanie R Hunter; Bethany S McGowan; Evan J Reister; Yu Wang; Richard D Mattes Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 11.567
Authors: Sanne Griffioen-Roose; Paul A M Smeets; Pascalle L G Weijzen; Inge van Rijn; Iris van den Bosch; Cees de Graaf Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: P J Rogers; P S Hogenkamp; C de Graaf; S Higgs; A Lluch; A R Ness; C Penfold; R Perry; P Putz; M R Yeomans; D J Mela Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 5.095