Literature DB >> 34686892

Multiparametric analysis of voice following prolonged voice use and voice rest in teachers: evidence from discriminant analysis.

S V Narasimhan1, Bhavana Gowda2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Even though recent investigations have used multiparametric protocol, the set of robust parameters in determining the effects of vocal fatigue and voice rest in teachers is not clear. The first objective of the study was to document the impact of prolonged voice use and voice rest on the subjective and objective voice parameters among Indian secondary school teachers. The second objective was to determine the set voice parameters sensitive to vocal changes resulting from continuous voice use and voice rest.
METHOD: The study included 15 male and 15 female secondary school teachers with a clinically normal voice and no history of voice disorders. Phonation samples were recorded in three different conditions, i.e., condition 1 (before voice use), condition 2 (following voice use), and condition 3 (following voice rest). The vocal Fatigue Index (version 2) was administered before the voice recordings in all three conditions. The objective parameters, namely fundamental frequency, range of fundamental frequency, jitter (%), shimmer (%), harmonic to noise ratio, and smoothened cepstral peak prominence, were extracted.
RESULTS: Results revealed that fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, Harmonic to noise ratio, and smoothened cepstral peak prominence were significantly different across the three conditions. The discriminant analysis revealed that only three parameters classified 98.3% of samples accurately between the three conditions.
CONCLUSION: Further research on the correlation between the other subjective and the objective parameters of voice after vocal fatigue would provide more penetrating and ample in-depth insights into the assessment and quantification of vocal fatigue.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic analysis; Cepstral peak prominence; Discriminant analysis; Teachers; Vocal fatigue; Vocal fatigue Index

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34686892     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07144-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  16 in total

1.  Effects of prolonged oral reading on F0, SPL, subglottal pressure and amplitude characteristics of glottal flow waveforms.

Authors:  E Vilkman; E R Lauri; P Alku; E Sala; M Sihvo
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Relationship between subjective voice complaints and acoustic parameters in female teachers' voices.

Authors:  L Rantala; E Vilkman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Populations in the U.S. workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade: a preliminary report.

Authors:  I R Titze; J Lemke; D Montequin
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI): Development and Validation.

Authors:  Chayadevie Nanjundeswaran; Barbara H Jacobson; Jackie Gartner-Schmidt; Katherine Verdolini Abbott
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Objective measures of voice production in normal subjects following prolonged voice use.

Authors:  J C Stemple; J Stanley; L Lee
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 6.  Vocal fatigue: current knowledge and future directions.

Authors:  Nathan V Welham; Margaret A Maclagan
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Balloon dilation laryngoplasty for acquired subglottic stenosis at a tertiary center in India.

Authors:  Kalpesh B Patel; Oman Prajapati; Vaidik Mayurkumar Chauhan; Chinmayee Joshi; Dipesh Darji
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-08-18

8.  Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality.

Authors:  J Hillenbrand; R A Cleveland; R L Erickson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-08

9.  Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered voice quality: pros, cons and future directions.

Authors:  Jennifer Oates
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 0.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.