Literature DB >> 34686635

Differential Antimicrobial Efficacy of Multipurpose Solutions against Acanthamoeba Trophozoites.

Rhonda Walters1, Elise Miller1, Allison Campolo1, Manal M Gabriel1, Paul Shannon1, Cindy McAnally1, Monica Crary.   

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE: This investigation examines the effectiveness of several common contact lens solutions in the disinfection of Acanthamoeba, which causes a serious eye infection most often resulting from dysfunctional or improper use of contact lens products.
PURPOSE: Acanthamoeba keratitis is an eye infection caused by a free-living amoeba, which can lead to extensive corneal damage and frequently blindness. Acanthamoeba keratitis is linked with contact lens use combined with noncompliance with contact lens care cleaning regimens. The patient's choice and use of multipurpose solutions (MPSs) continue to be a risk factor for Acanthamoeba keratitis. Thus, it is critical that the Acanthamoeba disinfection efficacy of the popular MPSs be determined. Here we compare the efficacy of seven major MPSs on the global market.
METHODS: Using standard methods of Acanthamoeba disinfection and quantification, Acanthamoeba ATCC 30461, 30868, 50370, and 50676 trophozoites were inoculated into each MPS and held for the manufacturer's recommended disinfection time. Acanthamoeba recovery plates were incubated for 14 days, after which positive wells were identified and cell concentrations determined using the 50% endpoint method.
RESULTS: Members of the OPTI-FREE products (Express, Replenish, and Puremoist [Alcon, Fort Worth, TX]) demonstrated significantly higher percentages of antimicrobial activity compared with the renu Advanced Formula (Bausch + Lomb, Rochester, NY), Biotrue (Bausch + Lomb), Acuvue RevitaLens (Johnson & Johnson, Santa Ana, CA), and Lite products (Cooper Vision, Scottsville, NY) for four of the trophozoite strains tested.
CONCLUSIONS: Many of the popular MPS biocides maintain little or no antimicrobial activity against Acanthamoeba trophozoites, and the number of biocides in an MPS does not necessarily indicate its antimicrobial activity.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Optometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34686635      PMCID: PMC8677607          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


Acanthamoeba is a pervasive microorganism. However, Acanthamoeba keratitis is a fortunately rare condition, as this infection can lead to blindness in as many as 41% of the afflicted patients.[1,2] Outbreaks of Acanthamoeba keratitis in the United States in 2007[3] and in the United Kingdom since 2010[4] have been directly linked to particular multipurpose solution contact lens care products.[3-6] These outbreaks resulted in the withdrawal of those products.[3-6] Although the current International Standard (ISO 14729)[7] does not presently recommend acanthamoebicidal testing, this standard is currently being updated by the American National Standards Institute and the International Standards Committee.[8] The differences in the products' formulations and the biocides used in each product maintain the clear differentiation in the Acanthamoeba disinfection capabilities of each multipurpose solution. In general, Acanthamoeba is susceptible to some common biocides, which may have a variety of disinfection mechanisms. For instance, Acanthamoeba pseudopodia, nucleolar structure, mitochondria, and endoplasmic reticulum are susceptible to chlorhexidine gluconate.[9] Chlorhexidine diacetate has also been shown to produce shrinkage from the cyst wall, whereas polyhexamethylene biguanide induced both withdrawal of the cytoplasm from the cyst wall and swelling of cysts.[10] Finally, chlorine treatment has led to size reduction, permeabilization, and retraction of pseudopods.[11] The biocides available for use within any multipurpose solution provide a unique challenge. Alongside the use of cleaning, wetting, and comfort agents, the biocides included in every multipurpose solution reach toward the goal of maintaining sufficient antimicrobial activity against potentially pathogenic microorganisms while promoting ocular health. Biocides effective against Acanthamoeba may not be suitable for patient safety as part of a multipurpose solution because of the potential for corneal damage. Furthermore, because Acanthamoeba is a unique pathogen in the field of potentially infectious ocular agents, biocides that may be effective against other common microorganisms and can be included in multipurpose solutions may have little to no effect against amoeba in either the trophozoite or cyst formation.[12,13] Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the Acanthamoeba disinfection efficacy of seven of the most common multipurpose solutions on the global market.

METHODS

As previously described,[14,15] axenic culture media (containing 20 g biosate peptone, 5 g glucose, 0.3 KH2PO4, 10 μg vitamin B12, and 15 mg l-methionine per liter of distilled deionized water) was used to produce homogenous populations of Acanthamoeba trophozoites. Axenic culture media was adjusted to a pH of 6.6 to 6.95 with 1 M of NaOH and autoclaved at 121°C for 20 minutes before storing at room temperature for use within 2 months. One-fourth Ringer's solution was used to harvest organisms and for seeding trophozoites into 96-well plates. Antimicrobial efficacy of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Acanthamoeba trophozoites was conducted as previously published,[14] per a modified version of ISO standard 14729. Acanthamoeba strains were obtained from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA): ATCC 30461 (Acanthamoeba polyphaga, group T4, isolated from human corneal scrapings; Houston, TX, 1973), ATCC 30868 (Acanthamoeba castellanii, group T4, isolated from human cornea; Cambridge, England, 1974), ATCC 50370 (A. castellanii, group T4, isolated from human eye infection; New York, NY, 1978), and ATCC 50676 (Acanthamoeba mauritaniensis, group T4, isolated from human eye infection; Namibia or South Africa, 1990). These strains belong to the T4 group, which is the most commonly associated genotype with Acanthamoeba keratitis.[16]Acanthamoeba trophozoites were subcultured in axenic media with the final 24 hours of growth in fresh media to promote uniform Acanthamoeba trophozoite proliferation, before testing. After scale-up, cells were collected and centrifuged at 500g for 5 minutes at room temperature, and washed three times with Ringer's solution. Pellets were then resuspended in Ringer's solution, and the count seeding density was confirmed via hemocytometer. Trophozoites were inoculated into each multipurpose solution for a final cell density between 2 × 105 and 5 × 105 cells per well. Each multipurpose solution was held at room temperature for the manufacturer's soaking time (Table 1). At disinfection time, 1 mL of multipurpose solution was placed in 9 mL of neutralizing broth (Ringer's solution with lecithin and polysorbate 80 to neutralize quaternaries, phenolics, hexachlorophene, and formalin)[17] and serially diluted in Ringer's solution. Each dilution was plated in quadruplicate on a 12-well plate containing 2 mL of nonnutrient agar with 100 μL of Escherichia coli (108 colony-forming unit/mL; ATCC 8739). Plates were incubated for 14 days at 28°C ± 2°C. After incubation, positive wells were identified and surviving cells quantified using the 50% end point following the Reed and Muench computation.[18] This computation calculates the concentration of a test substance or culture that produces an effect of interest in half of the test units. Antimicrobial efficacy was determined by calculating the log and percent reduction of the cell densities recovered from the multipurpose solution at disinfection time, compared with the inoculum control of the respective strain. Each Acanthamoeba strain was tested in one to two independent trials, in triplicate, on different days, and the results were averaged. All multipurpose solutions were tested simultaneously using the same inoculum stock as a direct comparison. To understand the differences between groups, log reduction quantifications were analyzed via the Student two-tailed t test and are represented as mean ± standard error.
TABLE 1

Multipurpose solutions used and their manufacturers, biocides, and stated disinfection times

Contact lens care productManufacturerBiocidesDisinfection time (h)
OPTI-FREE PuremoistAlcon, Fort Worth, TXPolyquaternium-1 (0.001%), myristamidopropyl dimethylamine (0.0006%)6
OPTI-FREE ExpressAlcon, Fort Worth, TXPolyquaternium-1 (0.001%), myristamidopropyl dimethylamine (0.0005%)6
OPTI-FREE ReplenishAlcon, Fort Worth, TXPolyquaternium-1 (0.001%), myristamidopropyl dimethylamine (0.0005%)6
Acuvue RevitaLensJohnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJPolyquaternium-1 (0.0003%), alexidine dihydrochloride (0.00016%)6
renu Advanced FormulaBausch + Lomb, Rochester, NYPolyquaternium (0.00015%), alexidine dihydrochloride (0.0002%), polyaminopropyl biguanide (0.00005%)4
BiotrueBausch + Lomb, Rochester, NYPolyaminopropyl biguanide (0.00013%), polyquaternium (0.0001%)4
LiteCooperVision, Lake Forest, CAPolyhexanide (0.0001%)6
Multipurpose solutions used and their manufacturers, biocides, and stated disinfection times To obtain images of the Acanthamoeba following disinfection efficacy of each solution, propidium iodide staining (as propidium iodide only binds to exposed cellular DNA of amoeba with damaged cell walls; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used with three of the Acanthamoeba strains: ATCC 30461, ATCC 50370, and ATCC 50676.[15] Propidium iodide staining was performed on separate cultures from those used for quantification via the 50% endpoint method. Briefly, Acanthamoeba were seeded into a black clear-bottom 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well. Cells were allowed to adhere for 2 hours. Media was removed, and multipurpose solutions were added to appropriate wells (0.2 mL/well) in 15 replicates to confirm that representative images were indicative of quantitative log calculations. Blanks and untreated Acanthamoeba wells were included as controls. Following the multipurpose solution manufacturer's listed disinfection time, multipurpose solutions were removed, and 0.2 mL of 2 μg/mL propidium iodide diluted in ¼ Ringer's solution was added to each well of the 15 replicates. This was followed by confocal imaging (Nikon Ti Eclipse Microscope; Nikon, Minato City, Tokyo, Japan) at ×20 magnification using the Nikon NIS-Elements platform.

RESULTS

To determine the Acanthamoeba disinfection efficacy of each multipurpose solution, trophozoites were tested in each multipurpose solution according to the manufacturer's stated disinfection time at room temperature (Fig. 1, Table 2). The disinfection efficacy of each multipurpose solution was determined by calculating the percent reduction compared with the inoculum control. Inoculum controls for each strain and replicate ranged between 2 × 105 and 3.8 × 105 log cells/mL. Each multipurpose solution was tested against ATCC 30461 (Fig. 1A), ATCC 30868 (Fig. 1B), ATCC 50370 (Fig. 1C), ATCC 50676 (Fig. 1D). In all four strains, OPTI-FREE Express Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution and OPTI-FREE Puremoist Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX) maintained significantly higher antimicrobial activity than the renu Advanced Formula (P < .05; Bausch + Lomb, Rochester, NY), Biotrue (P < .05; Bausch + Lomb), and Lite products (P < .05; Cooper Vision, Scottsville, NY). In the ATCC 30461 strain, OPTI-FREE Express Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution and OPTI-FREE Puremoist Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution maintained a significantly higher antimicrobial activity than Acuvue RevitaLens (P < .001; Johnson & Johnson, Santa Ana, CA). This was also true for strain ATCC 50370 (P < .001) and in strain ATCC 30868 (P ≤ .001). Similarly, for the ATCC 30461 strain, OPTI-FREE Replenish Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution demonstrated significantly greater antimicrobial activity versus Biotrue (P = .003); for the ATCC 30868 strain versus renu Advanced Formula (P = .04) and Lite (P = .003); for the ATCC 50370 strain versus renu Advanced Formula (P = .005), Biotrue (P < .001), Acuvue RevitaLens (P < .001), and Lite (P < .001); and for the ATCC 50676 strain versus Biotrue (P = .004) and Lite (P = .001).
FIGURE 1

OPTI-FREE products (Express, Replenish, and Puremoist Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solutions) maintain a significantly higher percentage of Acanthamoeba antimicrobial efficacy vs. other global market products. Quantifications are represented as mean ± standard error percent reduction vs. inoculum controls. All seven products were tested against ATCC 30461 (A), ATCC 30868 (B), ATCC 50370 (C), and ATCC 50676 (D). n = 3 to 6 per group. aaP < .05 vs. renu Advanced Formula, aP < .005 vs. renu Advanced Formula, bP < .005 vs. Biotrue, cP < .005 vs. Acuvue RevitaLens, and dP < .005 vs. Lite.

TABLE 2

CIs for multipurpose solution disinfection efficacy comparisons with P < .05, as related to Figs. 1 to 4

Contact lens care productCompared withStrain tested95% CI
OPTI-FREE Express MPSrenu Advanced FormulaATCC 30461−3.127 to −1.674
OPTI-FREE Express MPSBiotrueATCC 30461−4.244 to −2.983
OPTI-FREE Express MPSAcuvue RevitaLensATCC 30461−3.681 to −2.394
OPTI-FREE Express MPSLiteATCC 30461−3.325 to −2.018
OPTI-FREE Replenish MPSBiotrueATCC 30461−1.885 to −0.5141
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSrenu Advanced FormulaATCC 30461−3.102 to −1.701
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSBiotrueATCC 30461−4.215 to −3.014
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSAcuvue RevitaLensATCC 30461−3.653 to −2.425
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSLiteATCC 30461−3.253 to −2.092
OPTI-FREE Express MPSrenu Advanced FormulaATCC 30868−3.459 to −1.079
OPTI-FREE Express MPSBiotrueATCC 30868−4.129 to −2.045
OPTI-FREE Express MPSAcuvue RevitaLensATCC 30868−4.129 to −2.045
OPTI-FREE Express MPSLiteATCC 30868−4.938 to −2.917
OPTI-FREE Replenish MPSrenu Advanced FormulaATCC 308680.067 to 1.535
OPTI-FREE Replenish MPSLiteATCC 30868−1.235 to −0.479
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSrenu Advanced FormulaATCC 30868−3.385 to −2.091
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSBiotrueATCC 30868−3.852 to −3.260
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSAcuvue RevitaLensATCC 30868−3.852 to −3.260
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSLiteATCC 30868−4.457 to −4.246
OPTI-FREE Express MPSrenu Advanced FormulaATCC 50370−1.789 to −0.560
OPTI-FREE Express MPSBiotrueATCC 50370−2.113 to −1.237
OPTI-FREE Express MPSAcuvue RevitaLensATCC 50370−1.841 to −0.349
OPTI-FREE Express MPSLiteATCC 50370−2.117 to −1.780
OPTI-FREE Replenish MPSrenu Advanced FormulaATCC 50370−1.598 to −0.373
OPTI-FREE Replenish MPSBiotrueATCC 50370−1.920 to −1.055
OPTI-FREE Replenish MPSAcuvue RevitaLensATCC 50370−1.648 to −0.753
OPTI-FREE Replenish MPSLiteATCC 50370−1.958 to −1.623
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSrenu Advanced FormulaATCC 50370−2.076 to −0.0660
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSBiotrueATCC 50370−2.430 to −1.308
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSAcuvue RevitaLensATCC 50370−2.155 to −1.008
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSLiteATCC 50370−2.753 to −1.591
OPTI-FREE Express MPSrenu Advanced FormulaATCC 50676−1.855 to −0.039
OPTI-FREE Express MPSBiotrueATCC 50676−3.367 to −2.041
OPTI-FREE Express MPSLiteATCC 50676−4.977 to −3.098
OPTI-FREE Replenish MPSBiotrueATCC 50676−3.318 to −1.240
OPTI-FREE Replenish MPSLiteATCC 50676−4.846 to −2.379
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSrenu Advanced FormulaATCC 50676−1.913 to −0.575
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSBiotrueATCC 50676−3.255 to −2.742
OPTI-FREE Puremoist MPSLiteATCC 50676−5.045 to −3.618

CI = confidence interval; MPS = multipurpose solution.

OPTI-FREE products (Express, Replenish, and Puremoist Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solutions) maintain a significantly higher percentage of Acanthamoeba antimicrobial efficacy vs. other global market products. Quantifications are represented as mean ± standard error percent reduction vs. inoculum controls. All seven products were tested against ATCC 30461 (A), ATCC 30868 (B), ATCC 50370 (C), and ATCC 50676 (D). n = 3 to 6 per group. aaP < .05 vs. renu Advanced Formula, aP < .005 vs. renu Advanced Formula, bP < .005 vs. Biotrue, cP < .005 vs. Acuvue RevitaLens, and dP < .005 vs. Lite. CIs for multipurpose solution disinfection efficacy comparisons with P < .05, as related to Figs. 1 to 4
FIGURE 4

Representative images of ATCC 50676 Acanthamoeba cell death after exposure to multipurpose solutions. Propidium iodide staining results in red stain indicating cell death or lysis, whereas gray color indicates living cells. Scale bar, 100 μm; ×20 magnification.

CI = confidence interval; MPS = multipurpose solution. For three of these strains, representative images of the antimicrobial efficacy were obtained using a novel rapid method, which was recently outlined.[15] Propidium iodide, which stains red any cellular DNA components that are exposed because of cell death and loss of cell membrane integrity, or spilled because of cell lysis, was used to examine Acanthamoeba cultures immediately after completion of the multipurpose solution exposure time as a separate qualitative examination from the log reduction quantitative experiments. These representative examinations were performed for all seven multipurpose solutions with the ATCC 30461 strain (Fig. 2), the ATCC 50370 strain (Fig. 3), and the ATCC 50676 strain (Fig. 4). The control samples (after 6 hours of incubation) demonstrated minimal red staining. However, natural cell death is evident even in the control samples, indicating a base level of expected mortality without intervention. Like the quantifications noted in Fig. 1A, the Lite multipurpose solution demonstrated a strong degree of cell death within the ATCC 30461 strain (Fig. 2), but not in the ATCC 50370 or 50676 strains (Figs. 3, 4). Acuvue RevitaLens and renu Advanced Formula seemed to cause the highest amount of cell death within the ATCC 50676 strain (Fig. 4), but not the other two strains. Biotrue seemed to induce a minimal amount of cell death in all three of the tested strains compared with the other products. Among all three strains, the three OPTI-FREE products demonstrated a high amount of red staining, indicating high amounts of cell death. Overall, these visual observations were in line with the 50% endpoint quantifications found in Fig. 1.
FIGURE 2

Representative images of ATCC 30461 Acanthamoeba cell death after exposure to multipurpose solutions. Propidium iodide staining results in red stain indicating cell death or lysis, whereas gray color indicates living cells. Scale bar, 100 μm; ×20 magnification.

FIGURE 3

Representative images of ATCC 50370 Acanthamoeba cell death after exposure to multipurpose solutions. Propidium iodide staining results in red stain indicating cell death or lysis, whereas gray color indicates living cells. Scale bar, 100 μm; ×20 magnification.

Representative images of ATCC 30461 Acanthamoeba cell death after exposure to multipurpose solutions. Propidium iodide staining results in red stain indicating cell death or lysis, whereas gray color indicates living cells. Scale bar, 100 μm; ×20 magnification. Representative images of ATCC 50370 Acanthamoeba cell death after exposure to multipurpose solutions. Propidium iodide staining results in red stain indicating cell death or lysis, whereas gray color indicates living cells. Scale bar, 100 μm; ×20 magnification. Representative images of ATCC 50676 Acanthamoeba cell death after exposure to multipurpose solutions. Propidium iodide staining results in red stain indicating cell death or lysis, whereas gray color indicates living cells. Scale bar, 100 μm; ×20 magnification.

DISCUSSION

Acanthamoeba keratitis is a dangerous ocular infection largely because of the difficulties in diagnosing, treating, and managing the disease. Critically, it can lead to severe corneal damage and, in many cases, permanent blindness without corneal transplant.[1,2] Although it is a fortunately rare affliction, misuse of contact lens care products or ineffective contact lens care products have been directly linked to Acanthamoeba keratitis infections and outbreaks.[3-6] Thus, it is integral to public health that information regarding the efficacy of common contact lens multipurpose solutions be both robust and available. The goal of this study was therefore to use widely reported methods of Acanthamoeba testing and quantification[19-24] resulting from multiple replicates, using both standard and clinical strains of Acanthamoeba,[25-27] and a wide range of multipurpose solutions on the global market. Notably, this study focuses on the trophozoite form of Acanthamoeba, as the biocides in non-hydrogen peroxide–based systems have been shown to be ineffective against the Acanthamoeba cyst.[28] The field of Acanthamoeba keratitis research and contact lens disinfection agents sometimes contains contentious or differing results, often attributable to varying methods of investigation and quantification. Fortunately, the methods used in this investigation demonstrated similar results to what has been reported for other global products.[29] Furthermore, despite a field of varied reports, some consistencies in the use of certain biocides against Acanthamoeba persist. For instance, the OPTI-FREE products have been previously demonstrated as highly effective against Acanthamoeba trophozoites.[12,30,31] OPTI-FREE products have also previously been found to produce little or no encystment,[32,33] ensuring that the more vulnerable trophozoite form persists and is able to be acted upon by multipurpose solutions. Finally, the biocides used in the OPTI-FREE products, namely, polyquaternium-1 and myristamidopropyl dimethylamine, have been shown to have the greatest efficacy against Acanthamoeba (and other ophthalmological pathogens) as compared with other biocides.[34-36] The results of the current investigation indicate similar results: products containing polyquaternium-1 and myristamidopropyl dimethylamine demonstrated significantly greater Acanthamoeba trophozoite disinfection efficacy than other biocides or combinations of biocides. According to the results demonstrated here, less effective biocides include polyaminopropyl biguanide or alexidine dihydrochloride combined with polyquaternium or polyquaternium-1. In addition, although having a greater number of biocides does not necessarily infer greater antimicrobial efficacy, as in the case of renu Advanced Formula, the higher concentration of polyquaternium-1 in the OPTI-FREE products does seem to impart a higher percentage of disinfection. Indeed, products containing 0.001% polyquaternium versus those containing less (0.0003% in Acuvue RevitaLens, 0.00015% in renu Advanced Formula, 0.0001% in Biotrue) maintained significantly greater antimicrobial activity. In addition, the OPTI-FREE products are the only products examined that contain myristamidopropyl dimethylamine. These data imply that either polyquaternium acts on Acanthamoeba in a dose-dependent manner, whereas other biocides are ineffective against this particular pathogen, or myristamidopropyl dimethylamine is a critical component to Acanthamoeba antimicrobial activity, or both. The visual examination of the antimicrobial activity of these multipurpose solutions demonstrated similar results to the 50% endpoint quantifications performed here. Propidium iodide staining has been previously established as an efficient method for identifying dead or lysed amoeboid cells.[15,37,38] Visually, it is easy to assess that there is very little cell death in control samples (although a minor amount of cell death persists because of natural cell cycles) based on the very small amount of red staining. Furthermore, the visual observations gathered from these representative stains are in agreement with published data regarding the morphological changes of Acanthamoeba after exposure to biocides, such as a rounding of the cell wall, retraction of pseudopodia, and encystment.[11,39,40] The renu Advanced Formula, Biotrue, Acuvue RevitaLens, and Lite products (which contain a maximum of three parts per million of polyquaternium and/or any other biocide) overall demonstrated a low to moderate amount of propidium iodide staining between the three Acanthamoeba strains examined. In general, the antimicrobial quantifications aligned with the visual representations of Acanthamoeba cell death. Notably, within each of these multipurpose solutions, it was clear in both the 50% endpoint quantifications and the visual staining that the antimicrobial activity of each multipurpose solution can be altered by which Acanthamoeba strain is tested, as the results were not universal between strains. However, even within the differences noticed between strains, the OPTI-FREE products, which contain 10 parts per million of polyquaternium-1, consistently demonstrated both quantifiably high levels of antimicrobial activity and visually the greatest amount of propidium iodide-based cell death. In conclusion, the difference and concentration of biocides between multipurpose solutions are critically important in the endeavor to determine the contact lens care product antimicrobial activity. After the examination of multiple laboratory and clinical isolates of Acanthamoeba, and seven of the most widely used multipurpose solutions on the global market, this investigation demonstrated that the biocides used within the OPTI-FREE products are the most efficacious regarding Acanthamoeba trophozoite disinfection.
  34 in total

1.  Inefficacy of marketed contact lens disinfection solutions against keratitis-causing Acanthamoeba castellanii belonging to the T4 genotype.

Authors:  Sahreena Lakhundi; Naveed Ahmed Khan; Ruqaiyyah Siddiqui
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.011

2.  In vivo efficacy of silver-impregnated barrel contact lens storage cases.

Authors:  Ananya Datta; Mark D P Willcox; Fiona Stapleton
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Cellular response of the amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii to chlorine, chlorine dioxide, and monochloramine treatments.

Authors:  Emerancienne Mogoa; Charles Bodet; Franck Morel; Marie-Hélène Rodier; Bernard Legube; Yann Héchard
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Resistance of Legionella and Acanthamoeba mauritaniensis to heat treatment as determined by relative and quantitative polymerase chain reactions.

Authors:  Penelope H Dobrowsky; Sehaam Khan; Wesaal Khan
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Efficacy of contact lens systems against recent clinical and tap water Acanthamoeba isolates.

Authors:  Megan E Shoff; Charlotte E Joslin; Elmer Y Tu; Laura Kubatko; Paul A Fuerst
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Acanthamoeba castellanii: cellular changes induced by chlorination.

Authors:  Emerancienne Mogoa; Charles Bodet; Bernard Legube; Yann Héchard
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.011

7.  Antimicrobial Efficacy of Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions in the Presence of Contact Lenses and Lens Cases.

Authors:  Manal M Gabriel; Cindy McAnally; John Bartell
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.018

8.  Effect of 2, 6-Dichlorobenzonitrile on Amoebicidal Activity of Multipurpose Contact Lens Disinfecting Solutions.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Moon; Seungeun Lee; Fu-Shi Quan; Hyun-Hee Kong
Journal:  Korean J Parasitol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 1.341

Review 9.  Acanthamoeba keratitis - Clinical signs, differential diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Nóra Szentmáry; Loay Daas; Lei Shi; Kornelia Lenke Laurik; Sabine Lepper; Georgia Milioti; Berthold Seitz
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-19

10.  Evaluating Alternate Methods of Determining the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Contact Lens Care Products against Acanthamoeba Trophozoites.

Authors:  Allison Campolo; Paul Shannon; Monica Crary
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-01-27
View more
  2 in total

1.  Reduction of disinfection efficacy of contact lens care products on the global market in the presence of contact lenses and cases.

Authors:  Rhonda Walters; Allison Campolo; Elise Miller; Manal M Gabriel; Monica Crary; Cindy McAnally; Paul Shannon
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06

2.  The Activity of PHMB and Other Guanidino Containing Compounds against Acanthamoeba and Other Ocular Pathogens.

Authors:  Dharanga Ratnayake; Michael Ansah; Enas Al Ani; Wayne Heaselgrave
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-07-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.