| Literature DB >> 34685694 |
Beata Csiszar1,2, Gergely Galos2,3, Simone Funke4, Dora Kinga Kevey4, Matyas Meggyes2,5, Laszlo Szereday2,5, Peter Kenyeres2,3, Kalman Toth2,3, Barbara Sandor2,3.
Abstract
We investigated peripartum maternal red blood cell (RBC) properties in early-onset preeclampsia (PE). Repeated blood samples were taken prospectively for hemorheological measurements at PE diagnosis (n = 13) or during 26-34 weeks of gestation in healthy pregnancies (n = 24), then at delivery, and 72 h postpartum. RBC aggregation was characterized by M index (infrared light transmission between the aggregated RBCs in stasis) and aggregation index (AI-laser backscattering from the RBC aggregates). We observed significantly elevated RBC aggregation (M index = 9.8 vs. 8.5; AI = 72.9% vs. 67.5%; p < 0.001) and reduced RBC deformability in PE (p < 0.05). A positive linear relationship was observed between AI and gestational age at birth in PE by regression analysis (R2 = 0.554; p = 0.006). ROC analysis of AI showed an AUC of 0.84 (0.68-0.99) (p = 0.001) for PE and indicated a cutoff of 69.4% (sensitivity = 83.3%; specificity = 62.5%), while M values showed an AUC of 0.75 (0.58-0.92) (p = 0.019) and indicated a cutoff of 8.39 (sensitivity = 90.9% and specificity = 50%). The predicted probabilities from the combination of AI and M variables showed increased AUC = 0.90 (0.79-1.00) (p < 0.001). Our results established impaired microcirculation in early-onset PE manifesting as deteriorated maternal RBC properties. The longer the pathologic pregnancy persists, the more pronounced the maternal erythrocyte aggregation. AI and M index could help in the prognostication of early-onset PE, but further investigations are warranted to confirm the prognostic role before the onset of symptoms.Entities:
Keywords: early-onset preeclampsia; erythrocyte; hemorheology; red blood cell aggregation; red blood cell deformability
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34685694 PMCID: PMC8534376 DOI: 10.3390/cells10102714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Process of recruitment and sample collection of women diagnosed with PE and healthy pregnant women.
Maternal and neonatal demographic and clinical data.
| Maternal |
|
|
|
|
| Age (years) | 29.08 ± 2.13 | 30.42 ± 1.39 | 0.589 | |
| Gestation age at first sampling (weeks) | 29.69 ± 0.67 | 28.71 ± 0.48 | 0.240 | |
| Systolic blood pressure at admission (mmHg) | 160 (146–175) | 120 (119–130) | <0.001 | |
| Diastolic blood pressure at admission (mmHg) | 100 (90–110) | 80 (70–80) | <0.001 | |
| Heart rate at admission (/min) | 82 (80–95) | 82 (77–88) | 0.320 | |
| Body height (m) | 1.63 ± 0.06 | 1.67 ± 0.07 | 0.094 | |
| Body weight (kg) | 78 (70–87) | 80 (70–86) | 0.824 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 30.1 (26.8–33.5) | 28.2 (25.7–30.2) | 0.227 | |
| Change in body weight (kg) | 10 ± 7 | 13 ± 4 | 0.132 | |
| Mode of delivery: cesarean section (n; %) | 13; 100% | 9; 37.5% | <0.001 | |
| Length of hospital stay (day) | 8 (6–15) | 4 (4–5) | <0.001 | |
| Neonatal | Gestational age at birth (weeks) | 30.23 ± 0.86 | 39.06 ± 0.28 | <0.001 |
| Birth weight (gram) | 1355.83 ± 157.69 | 3420.00 ± 89.04 | <0.001 | |
| Birth length (cm) | 36.67 ± 1.64 | 49.76 ± 0.80 | <0.001 | |
| Head circumference (cm) | 27.81 ± 1.01 | 34.24 ± 0.35 | <0.001 | |
| Shoulder width (cm) | 28.09 ± 1.30 | 36.88 ± 0.57 cm | <0.001 | |
| Apgar 1 | 7.0 (6.0–8.0) | 9.0 (9.0–9.0) | <0.001 | |
| Apgar 5 | 9.0 (8.0–9.0) | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | <0.001 | |
| IUGR (n; %) | 7; 53.8% | 0 | <0.001 |
The results were expressed as the mean value ± standard deviation of the mean or median and interquartile range. BMI: body mass index; IUGR: intrauterine growth restriction.
Figure 2(a,b) M index and AI values reflecting RBC aggregation in PE and control group at the three investigated time points. Box plot diagrams show the median with interquartile ranges and the minimum and maximum values.
Figure 3Linear regression analysis of initial AI measured at diagnosis of PE and weeks of gestation at birth.
Figure 4Deformability (EI values) at medium shear stresses in preeclampsia and control group. Box plot diagrams show the median with interquartile ranges and the minimum and maximum values.
Figure 5ROC curve for preeclampsia comparing initial AI and M values per se measured at diagnosis or enrolment and their combination expressed as a predicted probability.