Literature DB >> 31111484

The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention.

Liona C Poon1, Andrew Shennan2, Jonathan A Hyett3, Anil Kapur4, Eran Hadar5, Hema Divakar6, Fionnuala McAuliffe7, Fabricio da Silva Costa8, Peter von Dadelszen2, Harold David McIntyre9, Anne B Kihara10, Gian Carlo Di Renzo11, Roberto Romero12, Mary D'Alton13, Vincenzo Berghella14, Kypros H Nicolaides15, Moshe Hod5.   

Abstract

Pre‐eclampsia (PE) is a multisystem disorder that typically affects 2%–5% of pregnant women and is one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, especially when the condition is of early onset. Globally, 76 000 women and 500 000 babies die each year from this disorder. Furthermore, women in low‐resource countries are at a higher risk of developing PE compared with those in high‐resource countries. Although a complete understanding of the pathogenesis of PE remains unclear, the current theory suggests a two‐stage process. The first stage is caused by shallow invasion of the trophoblast, resulting in inadequate remodeling of the spiral arteries. This is presumed to lead to the second stage, which involves the maternal response to endothelial dysfunction and imbalance between angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors, resulting in the clinical features of the disorder. Accurate prediction and uniform prevention continue to elude us. The quest to effectively predict PE in the first trimester of pregnancy is fueled by the desire to identify women who are at high risk of developing PE, so that necessary measures can be initiated early enough to improve placentation and thus prevent or at least reduce the frequency of its occurrence. Furthermore, identification of an “at risk” group will allow tailored prenatal surveillance to anticipate and recognize the onset of the clinical syndrome and manage it promptly. PE has been previously defined as the onset of hypertension accompanied by significant proteinuria after 20 weeks of gestation. Recently, the definition of PE has been broadened. Now the internationally agreed definition of PE is the one proposed by the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). According to the ISSHP, PE is defined as systolic blood pressure at ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure at ≥90 mm Hg on at least two occasions measured 4 hours apart in previously normotensive women and is accompanied by one or more of the following new‐onset conditions at or after 20 weeks of gestation: 1.Proteinuria (i.e. ≥30 mg/mol protein:creatinine ratio; ≥300 mg/24 hour; or ≥2 + dipstick); 2.Evidence of other maternal organ dysfunction, including: acute kidney injury (creatinine ≥90 μmol/L; 1 mg/dL); liver involvement (elevated transaminases, e.g. alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase >40 IU/L) with or without right upper quadrant or epigastric abdominal pain; neurological complications (e.g. eclampsia, altered mental status, blindness, stroke, clonus, severe headaches, and persistent visual scotomata); or hematological complications (thrombocytopenia–platelet count <150 000/μL, disseminated intravascular coagulation, hemolysis); or 3.Uteroplacental dysfunction (such as fetal growth restriction, abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveform analysis, or stillbirth). It is well established that a number of maternal risk factors are associated with the development of PE: advanced maternal age; nulliparity; previous history of PE; short and long interpregnancy interval; use of assisted reproductive technologies; family history of PE; obesity; Afro‐Caribbean and South Asian racial origin; co‐morbid medical conditions including hyperglycemia in pregnancy; pre‐existing chronic hypertension; renal disease; and autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome. These risk factors have been described by various professional organizations for the identification of women at risk of PE; however, this approach to screening is inadequate for effective prediction of PE. PE can be subclassified into: 1.Early‐onset PE (with delivery at <34+0 weeks of gestation); 2.Preterm PE (with delivery at <37+0 weeks of gestation); 3.Late‐onset PE (with delivery at ≥34+0 weeks of gestation); 4.Term PE (with delivery at ≥37+0 weeks of gestation). These subclassifications are not mutually exclusive. Early‐onset PE is associated with a much higher risk of short‐ and long‐term maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Obstetricians managing women with preterm PE are faced with the challenge of balancing the need to achieve fetal maturation in utero with the risks to the mother and fetus of continuing the pregnancy longer. These risks include progression to eclampsia, development of placental abruption and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme, low platelet) syndrome. On the other hand, preterm delivery is associated with higher infant mortality rates and increased morbidity resulting from small for gestational age (SGA), thrombocytopenia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cerebral palsy, and an increased risk of various chronic diseases in adult life, particularly type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and obesity. Women who have experienced PE may also face additional health problems in later life, as the condition is associated with an increased risk of death from future cardiovascular disease, hypertension, stroke, renal impairment, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes. The life expectancy of women who developed preterm PE is reduced on average by 10 years. There is also significant impact on the infants in the long term, such as increased risks of insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and hypertension in infants born to pre‐eclamptic women. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) brought together international experts to discuss and evaluate current knowledge on PE and develop a document to frame the issues and suggest key actions to address the health burden posed by PE. FIGO's objectives, as outlined in this document, are: (1) To raise awareness of the links between PE and poor maternal and perinatal outcomes, as well as to the future health risks to mother and offspring, and demand a clearly defined global health agenda to tackle this issue; and (2) To create a consensus document that provides guidance for the first‐trimester screening and prevention of preterm PE, and to disseminate and encourage its use. Based on high‐quality evidence, the document outlines current global standards for the first‐trimester screening and prevention of preterm PE, which is in line with FIGO good clinical practice advice on first trimester screening and prevention of pre‐eclampsia in singleton pregnancy.1 It provides both the best and the most pragmatic recommendations according to the level of acceptability, feasibility, and ease of implementation that have the potential to produce the most significant impact in different resource settings. Suggestions are provided for a variety of different regional and resource settings based on their financial, human, and infrastructure resources, as well as for research priorities to bridge the current knowledge and evidence gap. To deal with the issue of PE, FIGO recommends the following: Public health focus: There should be greater international attention given to PE and to the links between maternal health and noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) on the Sustainable Developmental Goals agenda. Public health measures to increase awareness, access, affordability, and acceptance of preconception counselling, and prenatal and postnatal services for women of reproductive age should be prioritized. Greater efforts are required to raise awareness of the benefits of early prenatal visits targeted at reproductive‐aged women, particularly in low‐resource countries. Universal screening: All pregnant women should be screened for preterm PE during early pregnancy by the first‐trimester combined test with maternal risk factors and biomarkers as a one‐step procedure. The risk calculator is available free of charge at https://fetalmedicine.org/research/assess/preeclampsia. FIGO encourages all countries and its member associations to adopt and promote strategies to ensure this. The best combined test is one that includes maternal risk factors, measurements of mean arterial pressure (MAP), serum placental growth factor (PLGF), and uterine artery pulsatility index (UTPI). Where it is not possible to measure PLGF and/or UTPI, the baseline screening test should be a combination of maternal risk factors with MAP, and not maternal risk factors alone. If maternal serum pregnancy‐associated plasma protein A (PAPP‐A) is measured for routine first‐trimester screening for fetal aneuploidies, the result can be included for PE risk assessment. Variations to the full combined test would lead to a reduction in the performance screening. A woman is considered high risk when the risk is 1 in 100 or more based on the first‐trimester combined test with maternal risk factors, MAP, PLGF, and UTPI. Contingent screening: Where resources are limited, routine screening for preterm PE by maternal factors and MAP in all pregnancies and reserving measurements of PLGF and UTPI for a subgroup of the population (selected on the basis of the risk derived from screening by maternal factors and MAP) can be considered. Prophylactic measures: Following first‐trimester screening for preterm PE, women identified at high risk should receive aspirin prophylaxis commencing at 11–14+6 weeks of gestation at a dose of ~150 mg to be taken every night until 36 weeks of gestation, when delivery occurs, or when PE is diagnosed. Low‐dose aspirin should not be prescribed to all pregnant women. In women with low calcium intake (<800 mg/d), either calcium replacement (≤1 g elemental calcium/d) or calcium supplementation (1.5–2 g elemental calcium/d) may reduce the burden of both early‐ and late‐onset PE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31111484      PMCID: PMC6944283          DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  206 in total

Review 1.  Preeclampsia and future maternal health.

Authors:  David M Carty; Christian Delles; Anna F Dominiczak
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 2.  Committee Opinion No. 638: First-Trimester Risk Assessment for Early-Onset Preeclampsia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Estimating the Cost of Preeclampsia in the Healthcare System: Cross-Sectional Study Using Data From SCOPE Study (Screening for Pregnancy End Points).

Authors:  Aimée Fox; Sheena McHugh; John Browne; Louise C Kenny; Anthony Fitzgerald; Ali S Khashan; Eugene Dempsey; Ciara Fahy; Ciaran O'Neill; Patricia M Kearney
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Differential inhibition of prostacyclin production and platelet aggregation by aspirin.

Authors:  G Masotti; G Galanti; L Poggesi; R Abbate; G G Neri Serneri
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-12-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The classification, diagnosis and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A revised statement from the ISSHP.

Authors:  A L Tranquilli; G Dekker; L Magee; J Roberts; B M Sibai; W Steyn; G G Zeeman; M A Brown
Journal:  Pregnancy Hypertens       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.899

6.  Preeclampsia--a pressing problem: an executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.

Authors:  John V Ilekis; Uma M Reddy; James M Roberts
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.060

7.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 743 Summary: Low-Dose Aspirin Use During Pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth.

Authors:  Neil Marlow; Dieter Wolke; Melanie A Bracewell; Muthanna Samara
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Association of serum PAPP-A levels in first trimester with small for gestational age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Katie Morris; Ashwini Bilagi; Pooja Devani; Mark D Kilby
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 10.  First trimester biomarkers in the prediction of later pregnancy complications.

Authors:  Stefan C Kane; Fabricio da Silva Costa; Shaun Brennecke
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  105 in total

1.  Platelet activation and placenta-mediated adverse pregnancy outcomes: an ancillary study to the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction trial.

Authors:  Lauren H Theilen; Heather D Campbell; Sunni L Mumford; Alexandra C Purdue-Smithe; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Neil J Perkins; Jeannie G Radoc; Robert M Silver; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Preeclampsia Emerging as a Risk Factor of Cardiovascular Disease in Women.

Authors:  Emmanouil Chourdakis; Nikos Oikonomou; Sotirios Fouzas; George Hahalis; Ageliki A Karatza
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2021-03-03

Review 3.  Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: a Comparison of International Guidelines.

Authors:  Rachel G Sinkey; Ashley N Battarbee; Natalie A Bello; Christopher W Ives; Suzanne Oparil; Alan T N Tita
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Impact of the ACOG guideline regarding low-dose aspirin for prevention of superimposed preeclampsia in women with chronic hypertension.

Authors:  Chaitra Banala; Sindy Moreno; Yury Cruz; Rupsa C Boelig; Gabriele Saccone; Vincenzo Berghella; Corina N Schoen; Amanda Roman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Ubiquitin-Specific Peptidase 5 is Involved in the Proliferation of Trophoblast Cells by Regulating Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling.

Authors:  Liu Li; Shuo Wang; Ming Wang; Guoqing Qi; Hongliang Zhao
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of severe preeclampsia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a retrospective study : This is the study for kidney and pregnancy...

Authors:  Menglu Wang; Shi Chen; Yingdong He; Minghui Zhao; Huixia Yang; Qian Chen
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.902

7.  Assembly of Cytoplasmic Stress Granules in Placentas in Women with Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Chunling Ma; Chao Li; Shihong Shao; Can Li; Sha Yu; Lei Zhao; Yan Li; Shuping Zhao
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 8.  A Review of Research Progress of Pregnancy with Twins with Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Na Wu; Haitao Shen
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-05-18

9.  Planned early delivery for late preterm pre-eclampsia in a low- and middle-income setting: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Alice Beardmore-Gray; Nicola Vousden; Sergio A Silverio; Umesh Charantimath; Geetanjali Katageri; Mrutyunjaya Bellad; Sebastian Chinkoyo; Bellington Vwalika; Shivaprasad Goudar; Jane Sandall; Lucy C Chappell; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 10.  Maternal microbiome in preeclampsia pathophysiology and implications on offspring health.

Authors:  Jeanne A Ishimwe
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.