| Literature DB >> 34684693 |
Boo-Kyoung Kim1, Hae-Se Lee1, Hee-Su Yang1, Kyung-Bin Song1.
Abstract
There have been many studies on the development biodegradable films using starch isolated from various food sources as a substitute for synthetic plastic packaging films. In this study, starch was extracted from ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba) nuts, which were mainly discarded and considered an environment hazard. The prepared starch (GBS) was then used for the preparation of antioxidant films by incorporating various amounts of cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) essential oil (CZEO), which provides antioxidant activity. The prepared GBS films with CZEO were characterized by measuring physical, optical, and thermal properties, along with antioxidant activity (ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP) measurements. With the increasing amount of CZEO, the flexibility and antioxidant activities of the GBS films increased proportionally, whereas the tensile strength of the films decreased. The added CZEO also increased the water vapor permeability of the GBS films, and the microstructure of the GBS films was homogeneous overall. Therefore, the obtained results indicate that the developed GBS films containing CZEO are applicable as antioxidant food packaging.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant activity; biodegradable film; gingko nut starch
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34684693 PMCID: PMC8537083 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26206114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Physical properties of GBS films containing CZEO.
| CZEO (%) | Thickness | TS | EB | Young’s Modulus | WVP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.056 ± 0.005 a | 11.91 ± 0.94 a | 56.81 ± 2.97 d | 29.58 ± 5.90 a | 2.18 ± 0.13 c |
| 0.1 | 0.056 ± 0.005 a | 10.66 ± 0.96 a | 73.67 ± 2.39 c | 20.21 ± 1.93 b | 2.66 ± 0.05 b |
| 0.3 | 0.061 ± 0.004 a | 7.38 ± 0.97 b | 103.56 ± 1.18 b | 10.87 ± 1.97 c | 2.84 ± 0.05 a |
| 0.5 | 0.062 ± 0.004 a | 4.89 ± 0.71 c | 115.01 ± 3.95 a | 6.63 ± 1.52 c | 2.85 ± 0.10 a |
Mean ± SD, n = 4. a–d Any means in the same column followed by different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Optical properties of GBS films containing CZEO.
| CZEO (%) | L* | a* | b* | Opacity (Abs/mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 96.76 ± 0.02 a | −0.34 ± 0.03 a | 1.95 ± 0.02 c | - | 0.28 ± 0.01 a |
| 0.1 | 96.45 ± 0.12 b | −0.41 ± 0.04 b | 2.25 ± 0.05 b | 0.37 ± 0.11 b | 0.26 ± 0.02 b |
| 0.3 | 96.04 ± 0.08 c | −0.43 ± 0.05 b | 2.39 ± 0.06 a | 0.80 ± 0.08 a | 0.20 ± 0.02 c |
| 0.5 | 96.00 ± 0.06 c | −0.49 ± 0.03 c | 2.40 ± 0.05 a | 0.84 ± 0.06 a | 0.15 ± 0.02 d |
Mean ± SD, n = 5. a–d Any means in the same column followed by different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 1SEM images of GBS films containing CZEO. (A) GBS-C; (B) GBS-0.1; (C) GBS-0.3; (D) GBS-0.5.
Figure 2FT-IR spectra of GBS films containing CZEO. (A) GBS-C, (B) GBS-0.1, (C) GBS-0.3, (D) GBS-0.5.
Figure 3Thermal stability of GBS films containing CZEO. (a) TGA, (b) DTGA.
Antioxidant activity of GBS films containing CZEO.
| CZEO (%) | ABTS Radical Scavenging | DPPH Radical Scavenging | FRAP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3.95 ± 0.20 d | 1.98 ± 0.20 d | 0.04 ± 0.01 d |
| 0.1 | 16.39 ± 0.57 c | 5.22 ± 0.92 c | 0.45 ± 0.06 c |
| 0.3 | 76.16 ± 0.44 b | 20.58 ± 0.67 b | 4.37 ± 0.07 b |
| 0.5 | 98.46 ± 0.57 a | 58.90 ± 0.74 a | 12.89 ± 0.20 a |
Mean ± SD, n = 5. a–d Any means in the same column followed by different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.