| Literature DB >> 34681021 |
Bala S C Koritala1, Yin Yeng Lee2,3, Shweta S Bhadri1, Laetitia S Gaspar1,4, Corinne Stanforth1,5, Gang Wu2, Marc D Ruben2, Lauren J Francey2, David F Smith1,6,7,8,9.
Abstract
At least one-third of adults in the United States experience intermittent hypoxia (IH) due to health or living conditions. The majority of these adults suffer with sleep breathing conditions and associated circadian rhythm disorders. The impact of IH on the circadian clock is not well characterized. In the current study, we used an IH mouse model to understand the impact of IH on the circadian gene expression of the canonical clock genes in the central (the brain) and peripheral (the liver) tissues. Gene expression was measured using a Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR). CircaCompare was used to evaluate the differential rhythmicity between normoxia and IH. Our observations suggested that the circadian clock in the liver was less sensitive to IH compared to the circadian clock in the brain.Entities:
Keywords: canonical clock genes; circadian rhythms; intermittent hypoxia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34681021 PMCID: PMC8535273 DOI: 10.3390/genes12101627
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Study design. Six-week-old C57BL/6J male mice were entrained under LD 12:12 h for fourteen days. Animals were then exposed to a seven-day normoxia or intermittent hypoxia (IH) condition. Animals housed under IH received hypoxic events only in the 12 h light phase. After the seventh day of IH exposure, animals from both normoxic and IH conditions were housed under constant exposure to normoxia for two days in constant darkness. On the second day, central (brain) and peripheral (liver) tissues were collected over 24 h at three-hour intervals. Three animals (n = 3) were sacrificed at each time point in both conditions. All animals were subjected to ad libitum feeding and stringent temperature control. RNA was purified from these tissues, and the expression of canonical clock genes (Arntl, Clock, Cry1, Cry2, Per1, Per2, Per3, Npas2, Dbp, Nr1d1) was measured using Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR). The data were analyzed through CircaCompare to evaluate differential rhythmicity between conditions. This figure was generated through BioRender.com (accessed on 15 October 2021).
TaqMan® Gene Expression assay IDs.
| Gene Name | Assay ID |
|---|---|
|
| Mm00500226_m1 |
|
| Mm00455950_m1 |
|
| Mm00514392_m1 |
|
| Mm01331539_m1 |
|
| Mm00497539_m1 |
|
| Mm00500848_m1 |
|
| Mm00520708_m1 |
|
| Mm00501813_m1 |
|
| Mm00478113_m1 |
|
| Mm00478120_m1 |
|
| Mm99999915_g1 |
|
| Mm00478295_m1 |
Figure 2Circadian rhythms of canonical clock genes. (A) Brain and (B) Liver panels represent the expressions of canonical clock genes over 24 h on the second day of constant darkness after exposure to a normoxia (circles; black) and IH (triangles; red). Solid and dashed lines represent rhythmic (p < 0.05) and non-rhythmic (p > 0.05) expression patterns, respectively.
Figure 3IH alters rhythmic expression of clock genes. Correlation plots represent rhythmicity p-values between normoxia vs. IH in brain (A) and liver (B). Genes rhythmic only in normoxia, only in IH, and in both are represented in blue, red, and cyan, respectively. The number of rhythmic clock genes in both conditions suggests that the circadian clock in the liver is less sensitive to IH compared to the circadian clock in the brain. Arrhythmic genes in both tissues are represented in black.