| Literature DB >> 34677465 |
Ye Yuan1,2, Te Li1,2, Tingting Wang1, C Benjamin Naman1, Jing Ye3, Xingxin Wu3, J Enrico H Lazaro4, Xiaojun Yan2, Shan He1.
Abstract
LC-MS/MS-based molecular networking facilitated the targeted isolation of a new cyclic hexadepsipeptide, cymodepsipeptide (1), and two known analogues, RF-2691A (2) and RF-2691B (3), from the fungus Cymostachys sp. NBUF082 that was derived from a mesophotic zone Aaptos sponge collected near Apo Island. The constitution and configuration of 1 was elucidated through 1D and 2D NMR-spectroscopy, high resolution mass-spectrometry, and chemical degradations including Marfey's analysis and chiral HPLC. It was observed that 1 was moderately cytotoxic against CCRF-CEM human acute lymphocytic leukemia cells in vitro with the IC50 value of 9.2 ± 1.1 μM.Entities:
Keywords: cytotoxicity; hexadepsipeptide; mesophotic zone; sponge-associated fungi; sponges
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34677465 PMCID: PMC8540034 DOI: 10.3390/md19100565
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1The structure panel of compounds 1–3 beneath the molecular networking cluster that contains nodes corresponding to 1 and 3 (Node A) and 2 (Node B). This cluster was extracted from the whole molecular network of the crude extract (Figure S1) for visualization purposes.
1H NMR (600 MHz) and 13C NMR (150 MHz) data of compound 1 in CDCl3.
| Position |
| Position |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hiv | |||||
| 1 | 172.6 | 16 | 167.8 | ||
| 2 | 50.2 | 5.27 ddd (10.3, 8.6, 4.7) | 17 | 79.1 | 4.67 d (5.0) |
| 3 | 38.6 | 2.81 dd (13.3, 10.3) | 18 | 30.4 | 2.28 m |
| 4 | 127.7 | 19 | 17.6 | 1.05 d (6.8) | |
| 5 | 130.3 | 7.12 d (8.6) | 20 | 18.8 | 1.04 d (6.8) |
| 6 | 114.6 | 6.82 d (8.6) | Ser | ||
| 7 | 158.0 | 21 | 170.2 | ||
| 8 | 114.6 | 6.82 d (8.6) | 22 | 55.0 | 4.76 td (2.1, 8.1) |
| 9 | 130.4 | 7.12 d (8.6) | 23 | 63.4 | 4.08 dd (12.2, 2.1) |
| 1’ | 64.7 | 4.46 d (6.8) | NH | 7.95 d (8.1) | |
| 2’ | 119.5 | 5.46 m | 24 | 171.9 | |
| 3’ | 138.4 | 25 | 51.8 | 4.55 m | |
| 4’ | 25.8 | 1.80 s | 26 | 39.1 | 1.55 m, 1.96 m |
| 5’ | 18.2 | 1.74 s | 27 | 25.1 | 1.62 m |
| NH | 7.47 d (8.6) | 28 | 21.4 | 0.90 d (6.6) | |
| Hic | 29 | 23.3 | 0.97 d (6.6) | ||
| 10 | 169.7 | NH | 5.95 d (8.7) | ||
| 11 | 73.5 | 5.47 dd (8.2, 4.7) | 30 | 170.5 | |
| 12 | 42.1 | 1.58 m, 1.72 m | 31 | 65.2 | 3.50 dd (9.0, 6.2) |
| 13 | 24.6 | 1.63 m | 32 | 36.9 | 1.37 m, 1.71 m |
| 14 | 23.0 | 0.94 d (6.3) | 33 | 24.5 | 1.02 m |
| 15 | 22.0 | 0.93 d (6.3) | 34 | 21.7 | 0.85 d (6.5) |
| 35 | 23.5 | 0.83 d (6.5) | |||
| 36 | 41.0 | 3.10 s |
Figure 2Selected HMBC and 1H-1H COSY correlations for 1.