| Literature DB >> 34674376 |
Jian-Wei Ge1,2,3,4,5, Shi-Ji Deng1,2,3,4,5, Zhi-Wei Xue1,2,3,4,5, Pin-Yi Liu6, Lin-Jie Yu1,2,3,4,5, Jiang-Nan Li6, Sheng-Nan Xia1,2,3,4,5, Yue Gu1,2,3,4,5, Xin-Yu Bao1,2,3,4,5, Zhen Lan6, Yun Xu1,2,3,4,5,6, Xiao-Lei Zhu1,2,3,4,5,6.
Abstract
AIMS: Microglia-mediated neuroinflammation plays an important role in the pathological process of ischemic stroke, and the effect of imperatorin on post-stroke neuroinflammation is not fully understood.Entities:
Keywords: MAPK pathway; NF-κB pathway; imperatorin; ischemic stroke; microglia; neuroinflammation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34674376 PMCID: PMC8673701 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther ISSN: 1755-5930 Impact factor: 5.243
FIGURE 1IMP decreased the production of LPS‐induced inflammatory cytokines expression in primary microglia. Microglia was pretreated with various concentrations of IMP (10, 30, 50 μM) for 2 h followed by LPS treatment (100 ng/ml). (A) The mRNA levels of iNOS, COX2, IL‐1β, IL‐6, and TNFα were measured using real‐time PCR after LPS treatment for 24 h with or without IMP. (B) The concentrations of NO, PGE2, IL‐1β, IL‐6, and TNFα in the supernatants of primary microglia were detected using the Griess reaction and ELISAs. (C, D) The protein levels of iNOS, COX2, IL‐1β, IL‐6, and TNFα were analyzed via Western blot β‐actin as an internal reference. The grey scale values of iNOS, COX2, IL‐1β, IL‐6, and TNFα in the blots were quantified by ImageJ software and normalized to β‐actin and were represented as the fold change. The values were presented as the means ± SEM. The data shown here were representative of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs. control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001vs. LPS‐treated group [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 2IMP reversed LPS‐induced microglia morphological changes and decreased the activation of pro‐inflammatory microglia. (A) Primary microglia were pretreated with different concentrations of IMP for 2 h and then treated with LPS for 24 h. The morphological feature was examined by immunocytochemistry analysis using Iba‐1 antibody. Scale bar = 20 μm. (B) Surface area of cells and (C) Integrated optical density (IOD) of Iba1 in (A) were measured by Image J. (D) The mRNA level of CD86 was measured using real‐time PCR. (E, F) Effects of IMP on the mean fluorescence intensity of CD86 measured using flow cytometry. (G) The mRNA level of Arg1 was measured using real‐time PCR. (H, I) Effects of IMP on the mean fluorescence intensity of Arg1 measured using flow cytometry. The values were presented as the means ± SEM. The data were representative of four independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs. control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001vs. LPS‐treated group [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 3IMP decreased LPS‐induced activation of MAPK and NF‐κB pathways in primary microglia. Effects of IMP on the LPS‐induced microglia pathways were studied by RNAseq. (A) Volcano plot for microglia cells challenged with IMP + LPS versus DMSO + LPS group, the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were listed. (B) Functional enrichment analysis of the KEGG pathway. (C) Heat map representing gene expression changes seen in IMP + LPS versus DMSO + LPS group in MAPK signaling pathway. n = 3 per group. Microglia were pretreated with various concentrations of IMP (10, 30, 50 μM) for 15 min followed by LPS treatment (100 ng/ml). (D, E) The protein expressions of p‐p38/p38, p‐JNK/JNK, p‐ERK/ERK, p‐ NF‐κBp65/NF‐κBp65 were analyzed by Western blot. The quantification of relative band intensities was determined by densitometry. (F) Microglia were treated with IMP and examined by immunocytochemistry analysis using NF‐κBp65 antibody. Scale bar = 10 μm. The values were presented as the means ± SEM. The data shown here were representative of three independent experiments. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs. control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐treated group [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 4IMP decreased the infarct volume and improved neurological deficits after ischemic stroke. (A) Representative TTC staining and infarct volumes at 3 days after MCAO. (B) Infarct volume was determined in MCAO mice after IMP treatment (n = 8). The results of mNSS scores (C, D), grip strength test (E, F), and rotarod test (G) were examined in MCAO mice after IMP treatment. n=15–17 per group at MCAO 1 d, n = 13–14 per group at MCAO 3 d. The values were presented as the means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001vs. DMSO group [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 5IMP suppressed the production of inflammatory cytokines and microglial activation in the brains of MCAO mice. (A) The mRNA levels of iNOS, IL‐1β, IL‐6, and TNF‐α in ischemic tissue were assessed by real‐time PCR. (B, C) The protein levels of iNOS, IL‐1β, IL‐6, and TNF‐α in ischemic tissue were assessed by Western blot. (D) Representative images of tissue sections from the ischemic penumbra collected 3 d after MCAO and stained with Iba1 and DAPI. Scale bar = 10 μm. n= 6 per group. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs. sham group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. DMSO group [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]