| Literature DB >> 34674028 |
Daniela Montorio1, Gilda Cennamo2, Maria Angelica Breve1, Feliciana Menna3, Michele Reibaldi4, Giovanni Cennamo1, Vincenzo Brescia Morra1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the optic nerve pial diameter (ONPD) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) using standardized A-scan ultrasound and to evaluate the correlation between the ONPD and structural, vascular optic nerve head features and visual field parameters in glaucomatous eyes.Entities:
Keywords: A-scan ultrasound; Optic nerve pial diameter; Optical coherence tomography angiography; Primary open angle glaucoma
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34674028 PMCID: PMC9007773 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05438-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ISSN: 0721-832X Impact factor: 3.117
Demographic and clinical data of controls and primary open angle glaucoma patients
| Eyes ( | 124 | 126 | - |
| Age (years) | 69.22 ± 5.77 | 70.14 ± 6.15 | 0.392 |
| Sex (female/male) | 32/30 | 33/30 | 0.655† |
| IOP (mmHg) | 15.22 ± 1.92 | 16.41 ± 1.52 | 0.546 |
| CCT (µm) | 542.23 ± 25.42 | 545.41 ± 23.11 | 0.752 |
| MD (dB) | − 0.80 ± 1.41 | − 5.48 ± 2.20 | < 0.001 |
| PSD (dB) | 2.03 ± 0.91 | 5.32 ± 3.50 | < 0.001 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD
POAG primary open angle glaucoma, IOP intraocular pressure, CCT central corneal thickness, MD mean deviation, PSD pattern standard deviation, dB decibel
General linear models, statistical significance p value < 0.05
†Chi-squared test
Comparison of ONPD, OCTA, and structural SD-OCT parameters between controls and primary open angle glaucoma patients
| ONPD (mm) | 2.98 ± 0.13 | 2.62 ± 0.18 | < 0.001 |
| RPC plexus whole image | 56.44 ± 4.58 | 42.87 ± 3.31 | < 0.001 |
| Ganglion cell complex (µm) | |||
| | 94.75 ± 7.11 | 77.16 ± 6.01 | < 0.001 |
| | 95.09 ± 7.19 | 79.75 ± 7.31 | < 0.001 |
| | 93.80 ± 8.71 | 74.62 ± 7.25 | 0.001 |
| Retinal nerve fiber layer (µm) | |||
| | 101.11 ± 7.83 | 84.55 ± 7.09 | < 0.001 |
| | 102.21 ± 8.94 | 87.66 ± 8.53 | < 0.001 |
| | 100.73 ± 8.80 | 79.64 ± 8.30 | < 0.001 |
| Optic nerve head analysis | |||
| | 1.45 ± 0.38 | 0.81 ± 0.27 | 0.002 |
| | 2.47 ± 0.41 | 2.49 ± 0.61 | 0.995 |
| | 0.41 ± 0.25 | 0.65 ± 0.19 | 0.013 |
| | 0.057 ± 0.51 | 0.532 ± 0.46 | < 0.001 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD
POAG primary open angle glaucoma, ONPD optic nerve pial diameter, RPC radial peripapillary capillary
General linear models, statistical significance p value < 0.05
Fig. 1Right eye of a healthy subject (66-year-old female) shows normal values of optic nerve pial diameter (ONPD) at standardized A-scan ultrasound. The yellow arrows over the peaks of the two high and perpendicular spikes, as shown in echogram, indicate the maximum pial diameter measured in the anterior third of the optic nerve (A). Structural spectral domain (SD)–optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed normal ganglion cell complex (GCC) (B) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thicknesses (C). At OCT-Angiography (OCTA), the vessel density of radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) plexus does not show reduction (D), as well as there is no visual field loss (E). Left eye of a patient (68-year-old female) with primary open angle glaucoma reveals a reduction of ONPD at standardized A-scan ultrasound examination (yellow arrows shown in A1). Structural SD-OCT (B1, C1) parameters show a widespread damage at GCC and RNFL thicknesses. OCTA (D1) examination presents significant impairment in vessel density of RPC plexus. Peripheral visual field loss is present with respect to healthy subject (E1)
Pearson correlation coefficient between ONPD and OCTA, SD-OCT, and visual field parameters in primary open angle glaucoma patients
| 0.626 | 0.006 | |
| 0.531 | 0.001 | |
| 0.512 | 0.001 | |
| 0.449 | 0.001 | |
| − 0.305 | 0.001 | |
| 0.401 | 0.001 | |
| 0.121 | 0.657 | |
| − 0.522 | 0.014 | |
| − 0.426 | 0.023 | |
ONPD optic nerve pial diameter, RPC radial peripapillary capillary, GCC ganglion cell complex, RNFL retinal nerve fiber layer, MD mean deviation, PSD pattern standard deviation
R Pearson’s correlation coefficient
Statistical significance p < 0.05