| Literature DB >> 34671750 |
Callum Lowe1, Mattthew Kelly1, Haribondhu Sarma1, Alice Richardson1, Johanna M Kurscheid1,2, Budi Laksono3, Salvador Amaral1, Donald Stewart1,4, Darren J Gray1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Indonesia is undergoing a nutrition transition (NT) comprised of rising rates of overweight/obesity and consumption of high fat food/snacks but is still struck by undernutrition, causing a double burden of malnutrition. Little research pertains to the double burden of malnutrition and its associations with diet in rural Indonesia using primary village level data.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34671750 PMCID: PMC8484895 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Reg Health West Pac ISSN: 2666-6065
Socio-demographics of the study population.
| Socio-demographic factor | N (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| 3–10 | 191 (12.6) | |
| 10–19 | 264 (17.4) | |
| 19–34 | 333 (21.9) | |
| 34–49 | 313 (20.6) | |
| 49–64 | 314 (20.6) | |
| 64+ | 106 (7.0) | |
| Male | 754 (49.6) | |
| Female | 767 (50.4) | |
| Topengan | 380 (25.0) | |
| Moyosari | 393 (25.8) | |
| Rajon | 340 (22.4) | |
| Losari | 408 (26.8) | |
| None | 205 (13.5) | |
| Elementary | 847 (55.7) | |
| Junior Secondary | 264 (17.4) | |
| Senior Secondary | 141 (9.3) | |
| College | 59 (3.9) | |
| Company | 28 (2.6) | |
| Self employed | 196 (18.5) | |
| Farmer | 374 (35.2) | |
| Home duties | 150 (14.1) | |
| Unemployed | 111 (10.5) | |
| Government employee | 25 (2.4) | |
| Other | 178 (16.7) | |
Distribution of employment type not calculated for children younger than 19.
Figure 1Distribution of normal, under- and over-weight by age and sex.
Prevalence of stunting status among children stratified by sex.
| Stunting | p | |
|---|---|---|
| 29 (37.2) | ||
| 10–19 years | 47 (34.1) | 0.376 |
| 23 (20.4) | ||
| 10–19 years | 48 (38.1) | 0.002 |
| All children 3–19 years | 147 (32.3) |
Stunting defined as Height-For-Age Z-score < -2 standard deviations [17]. Data reported as N (%) within age/sex group.
p-value obtained from chi-square test of proportion of stunting prevalence between age groups.
Figure 2Distribution of homes in study by nutritional status. Smaller pie chart contains the breakdown of double burden homes by type (Overweight/stunted, overweight/underweight, overweight/underweight/stunted).
Figure 3Rotated factor loading coefficients of principle components identified in factor analysis of dietary patterns. (a): “Nutrition Transition” component, (b): “Plant-based diet, (c): “Staple” diet.
KMO value = 0.80. p<0.0001 for Bartlett's Test of Sphericity.
Eigenvalues for components (a), (b), and (c) respectively were 4.348, 2.561, and 1.747.
Pearson correlations of nutrients and eating habits with diet patterns identified in principle component analysis.
| Nutrition Transition | Plant-based diet | Staple diet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy (kcal) | 0.036 | −0.083 | −0.037 |
| Fat (g) | 0.130 | −0.150 | −0.076 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | −0.090 | −0.024 | 0.025 |
| Protein (g) | 0.088 | −0.051 | −0.058 |
| Energy ratio (kcal/kcal) | 0.172 | −0.080 | −0.059 |
| Externally bought foods (#no./day) | 0.365 | −0.041 | −0.010 |
| Contribution of rice to energy (% kcal) | −0.157 | 0.193 | 0.046 |
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
Point-biserial correlation of nutritional variables with stunting status.
| Factor | r | p |
|---|---|---|
| Energy ratio | −0.139 | 0.003 |
| Protein ratio | −0.116 | 0.014 |
| NT diet score | −0.026 | 0.59 |
| Plant-based diet score | 0.149 | 0.001 |
| Staple diet score | 0.022 | 0.641 |
Multi-level linear regression for nutrition transition factor score.
| Factor | B (95% CI) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male (Reference) | |||
| Female | 0.033 (−0.042, 0.109) | 0.386 | |
| Normal (Reference) | |||
| Overweight | −0.099 (−0.184, -0.013) | ||
| Underweight | −0.197 (−0.265, 0.071) | 0.257 | |
| 3–10 | 1.696 (1.508, 1.885) | ||
| 10-19 | 1.186 (1.006, 1.366) | ||
| 19-34 | 0.451 (0.276, 0.626) | ||
| 34-49 | 0.248 (0.070, 0.425) | ||
| 49-64 | 0.136 (−0.041, 0.313) | 0.133 | |
| 64+ (reference) | |||
| Village | 0.001 (0.000, 0.238, p=0.705) | ||
| Household | 0.184 (0.145, 0.234, p<0.0001) | ||
| Participant | 0.485 (0.445, 0.529, p<0.0001) | ||
First level consisted of individual level fixed effects, second level consisted of participants nested within homes, third level consisted of homes nested within villages.
Mean of nutrition transition component scores = 0, standard deviation = 1.