| Literature DB >> 34671079 |
Serge Michalet1,2,3, Pierre-Marie Allard4, Carine Commun1,2,5, Van Thanh Nguyen Ngoc1,2,3, Kodjo Nouwade1,2,3, Bruna Gioia1,2,6, Marie-Geneviève Dijoux-Franca1,2,3, Jean-Luc Wolfender4, Anne Doléans-Jordheim7,8,9,10.
Abstract
In Cystic Fibrosis (CF), a rapid and standardized definition of chronic infection would allow a better management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) infections, as well as a quick grouping of patients during clinical trials allowing better comparisons between studies. With this purpose, we compared the metabolic profiles of 44 in vitro cultures of Pa strains isolated from CF patients at different stages of infection in order to identify metabolites differentially synthetized according to these clinical stages. Compounds produced and secreted by each strain in the supernatant of a liquid culture were analysed by metabolomic approaches (UHPLC-DAD-ESI/QTOF, UV and UPLC-Orbitrap, MS). Multivariate analyses showed that first colonization strains could be differentiated from chronic colonization ones, by producing notably more Alkyl-Quinolones (AQs) derivatives. Especially, five AQs were discriminant: HQC5, HQNOC7, HQNOC7:1, db-PQS C9 and HQNOC9:1. However, the production of HHQ was equivalent between strain types. The HHQ/HQNOC9:1 ratio was then found to be significantly different between chronic and primo-colonising strains by using both UV (p = 0.003) and HRMS data (p = 1.5 × 10-5). Our study suggests that some AQ derivatives can be used as biomarkers for an improved management of CF patients as well as a better definition of the clinical stages of Pa infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34671079 PMCID: PMC8528811 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99467-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Distribution of Pa strains according to the colonisation status of CF patients.
| Colonisation status of the CF patients | Number of patients | Number of strains | Strains abbreviations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primo-colonisation (never colonised before) | 9 | 9 | PP |
| Free (not colonised during at least one year before) | 10 | 10 | PF |
| Intermittently colonised | 5 | 5 | PI |
| Chronically colonised | 10 | 20 (10 couples) | PC (non mucoid strains) PCM (mucoid strains) |
| Total | 34 | 44 |
Figure 1(A) PCA (axis 1: 19.6%; axis 2: 13.1%) achieved on 97 integrated UV peaks at 280 nm. The extracts obtained from the 44 strains isolated from 34 CF patients are displayed according to strain types: PP (strains from patients never colonised by Pa; dark blue), PF (strains from patients not colonised by Pa during at least one year before; blue); PI (patient intermittently colonised by Pa; yellow), PC and PCM (patient chronically colonised by Pa; red and orange respectively). (B) PLS-DA (axis 1; axis 2) obtained from 97 integrated UV peaks at 280 nm according to strain types. The extracts obtained from the 44 strains PP, PF, PI, PC and PCM. (C) Correlation circle (axis 1; axis 2). Colored peaks correspond to discriminant peaks between first colonisation strains (PP/PF) and chronic strains (PC/PCM), in blue for those that are more detected in first colonisation strains and in orange for those that are more detected in chronic ones.
Discriminant peaks detected in extracts and also present (brown) or absent (blue) in culture medium, with their putative identity.
Significant differences in peak areas between strains are highlighted and p values obtained after ANOVA and post-hoc Tuckey’s HSD (or Kruskal–Wallis for non-parametric data‡) are shown for UV data (***p < 0.0001; **p < 0.001; *p < 0.05).
Figure 2Quinoline cluster divided into 4 subclusters corresponding to different AQs classes : PP (strains from patients never colonised by Pa; dark blue), PF (strains from patients not colonised by Pa during at least one year before; blue); PC and PCM (patient chronically colonised by Pa; red and orange respectively).
Figure 3Mean HHQ/HQNOC9:1 ratio ± SEM detected in chronic strains (PC + PCM, n = 20; in red) and in first colonisation strains (PP + PF, n = 19; in blue), using both UV (left) and HRMS (right) data. Significant differences were found by using Kruskal–Wallis tests (chi-squared = 8.7066, df = 1, p-value = 0.003171 for UV, and chi-squared = 18.723, df = 1, p-value = 1.511 × 10–5 for HRMS).