| Literature DB >> 34670557 |
Yong-Cheol Yoon1, Chang-Wug Oh2, Jae-Woo Cho3, Jong-Keon Oh4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The management of an infected nonunion of long bones is difficult and challenging. A staged procedure comprising radical debridement followed by definitive internal fixation was favored. However, no standard treatment has been established to determine the appropriate waiting period between initial debridement and definitive internal fixation. We propose a management method that incorporates early definitive internal fixation in infected nonunion of the lower limb.Entities:
Keywords: Early definitive surgery; Infected nonunion; Long bone; Staged reconstruction
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34670557 PMCID: PMC8529840 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02785-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Patient demographics
| Patient # | Sex | Age | Type of host | Anatomic type of OM | Injury mechanism | Lesion | Site | Fracture classification | # of previous operations | Microorganism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 56 | B | Diffused | Pedestrian TA | Tibia diaphysis | Left | Closed | 2 | MRSE |
| 2 | M | 36 | A | Diffused | Pedestrian TA | Tibia metaphysis (distal one-third) | Right | IIIA | 2 | Culture negative |
| 3 | M | 43 | B | Diffused | Sports exercise | Tibia metaphysis (distal one-third) | Left | Closed | 5 | |
| 4 | M | 45 | B | Diffused | Pedestrian TA | Femur diaphysis | Right | Closed | 2 | Culture negative |
| 5 | M | 49 | B | Diffused | Motorcycle TA | Tibia diaphysis | Right | IIIB | 3 | |
| 6 | M | 61 | B | Diffused | In car TA | Femur diaphysis | Left | Closed | 2 | MRSE |
| 7 | M | 61 | B | Diffused | In car TA | Both tibia Lt: Diaphysis Rt: Tibia Metaphysis | Both | IIIB | 2 | |
| 8 | M | 61 | B | Diffused | Motorcycle TA | Tibia metaphysis (Distal one-third) | Right | IIIA | 1 | MRSA |
| 9 | M | 25 | A | Localized | Motorcycle TA | Tibia diaphysis | Right | IIIA | 2 | |
| 10 | M | 58 | B | Diffused | Motorcycle TA | Tibia metaphysis (Distal one-third) | Left | IIIB | 1 | Culture negative |
| 11 | F | 40 | B | Diffused | In car TA | Both tibia Lt: Diaphysis Rt: Metaphysis (Distal one-third) | Both | IIIB | 1 | |
| 12 | M | 50 | B | Diffused | Motorcycle TA | Tibia metaphysis (Distal one-third) | Right | Closed | 3 | MRSA |
| 13 | M | 68 | B | Localized | In car TA | Tibia metaphysis (Proximal one-third) | Right | II | 1 | |
| 14 | F | 28 | A | Localized | In car TA | Femur diaphysis | Right | Closed | 1 | MRSA |
| 15 | F | 30 | A | Diffused | Fall | Femur diaphysis | Right | Closed | 3 | |
| 16 | M | 64 | B | Diffused | Pedestrian TA | Tibia metaphysis (Distal one-third) | Right | Closed | 2 | MSSA |
| 17 | M | 74 | B | Diffused | Motorcycle TA | Femur diaphysis | Left | Closed | 2 | Culture negative |
| 18 | M | 35 | A | Localized | Motorcycle TA | Femur diaphysis | Right | Closed | 4 | |
| 19 | F | 25 | A | Diffused | Fall | Femur diaphysis | Right | Closed | 3 | Culture negative |
| 20 | M | 33 | A | Diffused | Pedestrian TA | Tibia metaphysis (Distal one-third) | Right | IIIB | 2 | MRSA |
| 21 | M | 34 | A | Diffused | Pedestrian TA | Tibia diaphysis | Right | Closed | 1 | |
| 22 | M | 30 | A | Diffused | Pedestrian TA | Tibia diaphysis | Right | IIIB | 5 | |
| 23 | M | 51 | B | Localized | Pedestrian TA | Femur metaphysis (Distal one-third) | Left | Closed | 2 | Culture negative |
| 24 | M | 67 | B | Diffused | Pedestrian TA | Tibia metaphysis (Distal one-third) | Left | IIIB | 2 | Culture negative |
| 25 | M | 51 | B | Diffused | Pedestrian TA | Tibia metaphysis (Distal one-third) | Left | Closed | 1 | Culture negative |
| 26 | M | 36 | A | Localized | Pedestrian TA | Tibia metaphysis (Distal one-third) | Right | IIIA | 5 | |
| 27 | F | 59 | B | Localized | Pedestrian TA | Tibia diaphysis | Left | Closed | 2 | MSSA, |
| 28 | M | 59 | B | Diffused | Motorcycle TA | Tibia metaphysis (Proximal one-third) | Right | Closed | 3 | MRSA |
| 29 | M | 28 | A | Diffused | In car TA | Femur metaphysis (Distal one-third) | Right | II | 1 | |
| 30 | M | 25 | A | Diffused | Pedestrian TA | Tibia diaphysis | Left | IIIB | 1 | Culture negative |
| 31 | F | 51 | B | Diffused | Pedestrian TA | Tibia diaphysis | Left | II | 2 | MRSE |
| 32 | M | 44 | A | Diffused | In car TA | Femur diaphysis | Right | Closed | 1 | MSSA |
| 33 | M | 45 | A | Diffused | Motorcycle TA | Tibia diaphysis | Left | Closed | 2 | Culture negative |
| 34 | M | 45 | B | Diffused | Pedestrian TA | Tibia diaphysis | Right | II | 1 | MSSA |
#: number, M: male, F: female, TA: traffic accident. OM: osteomyelitis, MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MSSA: methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, MRSE: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis
Fig. 1Treatment algorithm for infected nonunions
Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) classification
| Bony results | Functional results | |
|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Union, no infection, deformity < 7°, and limb length discrepancy < 2.5 cm | Active, no limp, minimum stiffness (loss < 15° knee extension/15° ankle dorsiflexion), reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), and insignificant pain |
| Good | Union + any two of the following: absence of infection, deformity < 7°, and limb length discrepancy of 2.5 cm | Active with one or two of the following: limp, stiffness, RSD, and significant pain |
| Fair | Union + one of the following: absence of infection, deformity < 7°, and limb length discrepancy of 2.5 cm | Active with three or all of the following: limp, stiffness, RSD, and significant pain |
| Poor | Nonunion/re-fracture/union + infection + deformity of 7° + limb length discrepancy of 2.5 cm | Inactive (unemployment or inability to return to daily activities due to injury) |
Treatment result of infected nonunion
| Patient # | Antibiotics | Previous implant | DS implant | Interval to DS (weeks) | Additional operation Why? How? | Bone defect size (cm) | Bone graft or transport | Radiological result | Functional result | Union time (weeks) | F/U (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancomycin | IM nail | IM nail | 2 | None | 2.5 | G | Excellent | Excellent | 16 | 12 |
| 2 | Cephalosporin | Plate | Plate | 2 | None | 5.2 | T | Excellent | Excellent | 24 | 53 |
| 3 | Tazocin | Plate | Plate | 3 | Recurrence of infection Implant removal Secondary debridement Changing of cement beads Ilizarov application (3 wks later) | 4.8 | T | Fair | Fair | 52 | 27 |
| 4 | Cefazolin | IM nail | IM nail | 4 | Intra op PMN > 20 HPF Secondary debridement Changing of cement beads IM nail (2 wks later) | 7.2 | G | Good | Good | 20 | 12 |
| 5 | Ceftazidime | Monofixator | Plate | 4 | Soft tissue defect Gastrocnemius Rotation flap Plate (2 wks later) | 2.5 | G | Good | Fair | 20 | 27 |
| 6 | Teicoplanin | IM nail | IM nail | 3 | None | 5.8 | G | Excellent | Excellent | 18 | 33 |
| 7 | Imipenem | Monofixator | I + P | 4 | Soft tissue defect Gastrocnemius Rotation flap IM nail (2 wks later) | 5.2 | T | Excellent | Good | 24 | 24 |
| 8 | Vancomycin | Monofixator | I + P | 2 | None | 5.9 | T | Good | Good | 16 | 12 |
| 9 | Cefepime + ciprofloxacin | Ilizarov | IM nail | 2 | None | 3.1 | G | Excellent | Excellent | 16 | 12 |
| 10 | Cephalosporin | Ilizarov | IM nail | 2 | None | 4.6 | G | Excellent | Excellent | 22 | 14 |
| 11 | Meropenem | Rt: Ilizarov Lt: Monofixator | I + P | 2 | None | 4.5 | T | Excellent | Good | 16 | 28 |
| 12 | Teicoplanin | Ilizarov | I + P | 2 | None | 3.2 | T | Good | Good | 35 | 15 |
| 13 | Cravit | Plate | Plate | 2 | None | 5.6 | T | Excellent | Excellent | 20 | 30 |
| 14 | Vancomycin | Plate | IM nail | 3 | None | 2.3 | G | Good | Good | 20 | 12 |
| 15 | Cefazedone | Plate | IM nail | 3 | Recurrence of infection Implant removal Secondary debridement Changing of cement beads IM nail (2 wks later) | 3.2 | G | Fair | Fair | 20 | 17 |
| 16 | Vancomycin | Plate | IM nail | 2 | None | 4.1 | G | Good | Good | 24 | 37 |
| 17 | Cravit + Rifampin | IM nail | IM nail | 2 | None | 1.8 | G | Excellent | Excellent | 20 | 12 |
| 18 | Unasyn | Plate | IM nail | 4 | Intra op PMN > 20 HPF Secondary debridement Changing of cement beads IM nail (2 wks later) | 4.1 | G | Fair | Fair | 20 | 24 |
| 19 | Cefaclor | Plate | IM nail | 2 | None | 2.2 | G | Excellent | Good | 24 | 24 |
| 20 | Gentamycin | Plate | I + P | 4 | Soft tissue defect Gastrocnemius Rotation flap I + P (2 wks later) | 10.2 | T | Excellent | Excellent | 20 | 30 |
| 21 | Cycin + Unasyn | Monofixator | IM nail | 2 | None | 6.1 | G | Good | Good | 18 | 16 |
| 22 | Ciprofloxacin | Plate | I + P | 4 | Soft tissue defect Rotation flap surgery IM nail (2 wks later) | 10.3 | T | Excellent | Excellent | 20 | 12 |
| 23 | Cefotaxime | Plate | Plate | 2 | None | 2.1 | G | Excellent | Excellent | 12 | 12 |
| 24 | Cefotaxime | Ilizarov | IM nail | 4 | Soft tissue defect Distally based hemisoleus flap I + P (2 wks later) | 2.9 | G | Excellent | Excellent | 12 | 12 |
| 25 | Cefotaxime | Ilizarov | I + P | 2 | None | 5.2 | T | Excellent | Excellent | 20 | 12 |
| 26 | Ciprofloxacin | Ilizarov | I + P | 2 | None | 7.8 | T | Excellent | Excellent | 12 | 12 |
| 27 | Ertapenem | Ilizarov | IM nail | 3 | None | 1.7 | G | Excellent | Excellent | 12 | 48 |
| 28 | Teicoplanin | Ilizarov | Plate | 2 | None | 3.5 | T | Excellent | Excellent | 20 | 24 |
| 29 | Ciprofloxacin | Ilizarov | Plate | 2 | None | 5.4 | T | Good | Good | 20 | 24 |
| 30 | Cefotaxime | Ilizarov | I + P | 4 | Soft tissue defect ALT flap surgery IM nail (2 wks later) | 4.8 | T | Good | Good | 24 | 24 |
| 31 | Teicoplanin | Plate | Plate | 4 | CRP = 40 mg/L (0 ~ 5 mg/L) Secondary debridement Changing of cement beads Plate (2 wks later) | 1.7 | G | Excellent | Excellent | 24 | 12 |
| 32 | Cefotaxime | Plate | IM nail | 3 | None | 1.6 | G | Excellent | Excellent | 24 | 12 |
| 33 | Cefotaxime | Plate | Plate | 4 | CRP = 50 mg/L Secondary debridement Changing of cement beads Plate (2 wks later) | 1.5 | G | Good | Excellent | 12 | 24 |
| 34 | Cefaclor | Plate | Plate | 2 | None | 1.4 | G | Excellent | Excellent | 20 | 48 |
IM: intramedullary, DS: definitive surgery, PMN: polymorphonuclear leukocyte, I + P: intramedullary nailing with augmented plate
HPF: high-power field, ALT: anterolateral thigh, CRP: C-reactive protein, G: bone graft, T: bone transport
Fig. 2a, b A 33-year-old man (case 20) diagnosed with a right tibiofibular shaft open fracture (Open type IIIB) underwent open reduction surgery with internal fixation using plating at another institution. Continuous discharge and formation of a sinus tract were observed at the surgery site postoperatively. c To treat this, infected bone resection and radical debridement were carried out, antibiotic-coated beads were inserted, and a temporary external fixator was installed at our hospital. d Gastrocnemius rotation flap surgery was carried out for the soft tissue defect
Fig. 3a The patient underwent treatment as per the preoperative plan, and bone transport was done over the nailing that secured the fractured bones which was performed as definitive surgery. b Three months post-surgery, docking site bone grafting and augmentation plating were performed. c, d Bone union was achieved, and implant removal was performed 1 year post-surgery without complications