Literature DB >> 36168244

Efficacy of Staged Surgery in the Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures with Severe Soft Tissue Injury and Bone Defect.

Yong-Cheol Yoon1, Youngwoo Kim2, Hyung Keun Song3, Young Hyun Yoon4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of staged surgery using the acute induced membrane technique with an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer (ACS) and soft-tissue reconstructive surgery and to identify factors affecting clinical outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with severe open tibia fractures were treated via staged surgery from January 2014 to December 2019 and followed up for ≥1 year. In the first surgery, an ACS was inserted into the bone defect site along with debridement and irrigation and was temporarily fixed in place with an external fixator. The internal fixator was placed, and flap surgery and cement spacer changes were performed during the next surgery. In the third surgery, an autogenous bone graft was performed. Radiologic and functional results were investigated according to the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria, and factors affecting the ASAMI score were analyzed.
RESULTS: The average bone defect width was 43.9 mm, and the size of soft-tissue defect was 79.3 cm² . Bone union was achieved in all cases except one and required 9.4 months on average. Complications occurred in 10 cases (31.2%). Good or better clinical effects, in terms of ASAMI radiologic and functional scores, were observed in 29 and 24 cases, respectively. Complications and additional surgery were common factors affecting the two scores.
CONCLUSION: Staged surgery using the acute induced membrane technique and soft-tissue reconstructive surgery is an efficacious treatment for open tibial fractures with bone defects. © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tibia fracture; open fracture; reconstructive surgical procedures; soft tissue injury

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36168244      PMCID: PMC9520038          DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2022.0078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   3.052


INTRODUCTION

Open fractures are characterized by high-energy injuries, wherein the fracture site is connected to the external environment through an open wound and exposed to the skin’s surface. Accordingly, such fractures are generally transverse, comminuted, and segmental, rather than spiral or simple fractures, and additional surgery is often required to address accompanying soft tissue damage, making them highly susceptible to infection.1 Particularly, if the injury is accompanied by a bone defect as a result of the wound from the time of the accident or if a significant amount of bone loss occurs while removing devitalized bone during debridement, not only infection control but also repair of the defective bone and bone union are required, making treatment highly complex.2 Multiple treatment options have been explored for open fractures accompanied by bone and soft tissue defects. In general, as an initial treatment for open fractures of the lower extremities of Gustilo-Anderson classification type III or higher, an external fixator is inserted to fix the bone in place, and soft tissue defects are treated by negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT).3 However, problems of infection around the pin, delayed union, malunion, and nonunion have been reported in association with maintaining the initially inserted external fixator; thus, it was replaced with an internal fixator, such as an intramedullary nail or a plate, which may pose a risk of osteomyelitis or deep infection.4 In addition, the damaged bone space eventually becomes a dead space, or if the bone is fixed with an external fixator, the contactable region of the main fracture site is absent or reduced, decreasing bone stability.3 To the best of our knowledge, no studies have ever focused on the treatment of open tibial fractures with soft tissue and bone defects. Tibial fractures are the most common long bone fracture, and clinical manifestations vary from low-energy, low-displacement injuries to high-energy injuries with severe soft tissue and bone defects.23 Tibial fractures are often associated with open fractures, as the tibia has no muscle in the anteromedial region, and the bone is located directly in the subcutaneous layer. They are often accompanied by severe soft tissue injury, bone defects, compartment syndrome, and nervous or vascular tissue damage and are susceptible to infection, nonunion, and wound complications. Despite advances in soft tissue treatment methods and the variety of internal fixators, it is still very difficult to obtain satisfactory results in open tibial fracture treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to report clinical and radiological outcomes obtained by performing a three-staged surgery for Gustilo-Anderson classification type III or more severe open tibial fractures with bone and soft tissue defects using the acute induced membrane technique to fill the bone defect and the soft tissue reconstruction surgery to restore the soft-tissue defect. In addition, we sought to identify factors affecting the clinical outcomes of open tibial fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

From January 2014 to December 2019, 238 patients aged 18 years or older with tibial fractures visited our level 1 trauma center. Among them, we included in this study patients with type IIIB or more severe open fractures according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification who were surgically treated using the acute induced membrane technique and soft-tissue reconstruction because of bone and soft-tissue defects after debridement and who were followed up for ≥1 years.4 A retrospective analysis was conducted using patient medical records and radiographs. We excluded patients who underwent amputation as an initial treatment for severe comminuted fracture and damage (8 patients), clear brain injury (8 points or lower on the Glasgow Coma Scale on day 21 after injury or upon discharge, 15 patients), pathological fracture (2 patients), and periprosthetic fractures (3 patients).5 A total of 32 patients were included in this study (28 males and 4 females; median age 44.2 years, range 28–85 years). The mechanism of injury included traffic accidents in 24 patients (75%) and direct injury by heavy objects in 8 patients (25%) (Table 1). The study design and data collection were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Human Experimental and Ethics Committee of our hospital (IRB No: AJIRB-MED-MDB-21-032). The patients and/or their families were informed that data from their cases would be submitted for publication and provided informed consent.
Table 1

Patient Demographics

Patient #AgeSexPast historyInjury mechanismInjury siteCombined injuryInjury severity scoreGustilo-Anderson classificationAO-OTA classificationBone defect typeBone defect size (mm)Soft tissue defect size (cm2)
128FemaleNonePedestrian TARtLiver contusion13IIIA42-C3Segmental100220
247MaleNoneMotorcycle TARtL3 compression fracture13IIIB42-B3Partial2534
330MaleNoneMotorcycle TARtSDH25IIIB42-C3Segmental35110
439MaleNoneDirect injuryLtNone9IIIA42-C3Segmental6056
551MaleNoneDirect injuryRtNone9IIIA42-B3Partial1088
674MaleHTN, DMDirect injuryRtNone9IIIA42-C3Partial3848
734MaleNoneMotorcycle TALtEDH, Pneumocephalus, Femur neck fracture38IIIB42-C3Segmental2036
844FemalePanic disorderIn car TALtNone19IIIB42-C3Segmental4558
949MaleNonePedestrian TARtNone9IIIB42-B3Partial75120
1035MalePanic disorder, MDDMotorcycle TALtMRF, hemopneumothorax13IIIB42-C3Segmental4465
1151FemaleHTN, DMPedestrian TARtNone9IIIB42-C3Segmental5258
1285MaleNoneMotorcycle TARtSDH, MRF, Pneumothorax29IIIB42-C3Segmental3593
1345MaleNoneMotorcycle TALtAortic dissection25IIIB42-C3Segmental4046
1420MaleNoneDirect injuryRtNone9IIIB42-C3Segmental8572
1555MaleNonePedestrian TARtSpleen injury, EDH25IIIB42-B3Partial35136
1653MaleSystemic psoriasis, mental retardationBicycle TARtLt. pelvic bone fracture18IIIB42-B3Partial1542
Femur neck open fracture, Lung contusion both, T2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9 spinous fracture
1733MaleNoneIn car TARtNasal bone fracture11IIIB42-B3Partial4169
1829MaleNoneMotorcycle TALtLt. clavicle fracture, Lt. Kidney injury, spleen injury18IIIB42-B3Partial1763
1963MaleDMIn car TARtMRF, hemothorax18IIIB42-C3Partial3854
2046MaleNoneDirect injuryLtRt. Tibia shaft fracture9IIIB41-C3Partial77146
2169MaleNonePedestrian TARtLt. distal tibia and fibula open fracture, MRF, hemothorax, SDH18IIIB42-C3Partial938
2239MaleNoneIn car TARtSDH, pneumothorax, kidney injury17IIIB42-C3Partial3268
2342MaleNonePedestrian TARtPelvic bone fracture, lung contusion, EDH18IIIB42-C3Segmental4872
2458MaleNoneMotorcycle TARtSpleen injury, kidney injury hemopneumothorax, rib fracture22IIIB42-B3Partial4198
2548MaleHTNDirect injuryLtNone9IIIB42-C3Segmental72148
2628FemaleNonePedestrian TARtNone9IIIB42-B3Partial3046
2736MaleNoneMotorcycle TALtSDH, hemopneumothorax22IIIB42-C3Segmental5176
2827MaleNonePedestrian TARtNone9IIIB42-C3Partial3458
2942MaleNoneDirect injuryRtNone9IIIB42-C3Partial5672
3026MaleNoneMotorcycle TARtSpleen injury11IIIB42-B3Segmental3256
3146MaleNoneMotorcycle TALtRt. tibia shaft fracture9IIIB42-B3Segmental73130
3233MaleNoneDirect injuryRtNone9IIIB42-B3Segmental4260

AO-OTA, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association; TA, traffic accident; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; MDD, major depressive disorder; Rt, right; Lt, left; SDH, subdural hemorrhage; EDH, epidural hemorrhage; MRF, multiple rib fracture.

Surgical technique

In as many cases as possible, the first surgery was performed within 12 h after injury. Debridement was performed sequentially from the skin to the subcutaneous and deep tissues thoroughly and systematically, removing all contaminated skin.6 Since subcutaneous fat tissue and fascia have poor blood supply, any contaminated parts were thoroughly removed. Because fracture fragments are susceptible to infection, owing to relatively low blood supply (particularly those of the cortical bone in the shaft), the free cortical bone fragments not attached to soft tissue, such as the periosteum, were all removed regardless of their size.7 Next, tissue culture was performed around the fracture site, and an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer (ACS, DePuy CMW 3 gentamicin bone cement, DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA) was used to reproduce the original bone shape as much as possible and inserted into the site of the bone defect (Fig. 1). Subsequently, an external fixator was installed to avoid the zone of injury. For soft-tissue defects, NPWT was performed using vacuum-assisted closure.8 As for injuries with severe contamination, with a delay in surgery beyond 12 h after injury or with unsatisfactory debridement, a second-look surgery was performed by debridement after evaluating viability after 48–72 h. After ensuring the stability of the fracture through initial fixation, repetitive debridement and irrigation were performed every 2–3 days for the treatment of open wounds, and NPWT was maintained.9 Post debridement culture was performed at all stages, and according to the culture results, the type and duration of administered antibiotics were determined in consultation with an infectious medicine specialist. In most cases, efforts were made for 3 days or longer to avoid first-generation cephalosporin.
Fig. 1

Case of severe tibia open fracture. (A) A 46-year-old male patient (case 31) who sustained a severe comminuted proximal tibia open fracture (type IIIB) from a motorcycle traffic accident. (B) External fixation was performed with reductional plating using small plates and cannulated screws, and the bone defect was filled with a cement spacer on the day of injury. (C) Fix and flap surgery was performed 2 weeks later (conversional internal fixation with nailing and additional plating, cement spacer changing, and an anterolateral thigh free flap). (D) Postoperative 3-month follow-up X-ray showing adequate alignment and clinical photo showing satisfactorily healed soft tissue. (E) Cement removal and autogenous bone graft mixed with demineralized bone matrix and immediate postoperative X-ray. (F) A clinical photo shows the full recovery of the soft-tissue 9 months later. Postoperative follow-up X-ray and computed tomography scans show bone union.

After the soft-tissue condition improved and the patient generally recovered through repetitive wound cleaning and NPWT, a second surgery was performed to place an internal fixator for the fracture site and reconstruct the soft tissue. The second surgery (fix and flap) was generally performed within 2 weeks after the first surgery. During the surgery, the cement inserted into the bone defect site was first removed, followed by meticulous debridement, and an internal fixator and ACS were placed.10 Intramedullary nailing that could cover the entire length of the tibia with biomechanical superiority was first considered.11 When intramedullary nailing was difficult because of a fracture concentrated in the proximal or distal part, plating was performed (Fig. 2). Reconstruction was performed by a microsurgery specialist, and either a free or rotation flap was selected according to the condition of the soft tissue around the fracture, age of the patient, and general condition.12 When the condition of the reconstructed soft tissue improved, the patients were asked to begin joint range, quadriceps femoris muscle strengthening, and straight leg raise exercises. Initiation of weight-bearing exercise was dependent on the type of fixator used. When nailing was performed for fixation, immediate full weight-bearing exercise was allowed if the patient could tolerate this. In the case of fixation with plating, partial weight-bearing exercise was allowed when pain disappeared, while full weight-bearing exercise was allowed 6 weeks after surgery.13 The patients were allowed to return to daily life after discharge from the hospital for outpatient follow-up if they had no fever, if the flap site was viable without redness, swelling, or flush at the surgical site, and if there was no evidence of infection, such as a sudden rise in C-reactive protein levels or white blood cell count.14
Fig. 2

Case of tibia open fracture with bone and soft tissue defect. (A) A 20-year-old male patient (case 14) who visited the hospital with an open comminuted fracture of the distal right tibia due to a direct blow from a heavy object while working. (B) On the day of injury, emergency surgery, debridement, irrigation, and external fixation were performed, and the dead bone fragments were removed by additional surgery. (C) Ten days after the first stage of surgery, convert internal fixation, cement spacer insertion, and reverse sural rotational flap were performed by fix and flap surgery using a distal medial tibia plate. (D and E) Upon confirming the formation of a pseudomembrane following cement removal after 3 months, bone grafting was performed using an autogenous iliac bone graft. (F) Bone union was completed 8 months after surgery with excellent bone and functional scores.

After approximately 3 months, when the condition of the flap site was adequate and networking of collateral vessels around the flap was observed, a third surgery was performed to remove the cement from the bone defect site and an autogenic bone graft with bone obtained from the anterior or posterior iliac crest was applied. If the autogenic bone was insufficient, it was mixed with a demineralized bone matrix (DBM) for insertion. Augmented plating was performed, depending on the site, to enhance fixation in the bone defect area.

Evaluation and follow-up

In this study, to evaluate the fracture site severity of patients who underwent final operation according to the protocol, we examined the injury mechanism, past history, injury site, associated injuries, injury severity score upon hospital visit, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification to determine fracture location and degree of fracture, and Gustilo-Anderson classification for the evaluation of open fractures.415 Bone defects were classified as partial when there was contact between the main fracture sites and as segmental when there was no contact with the main fracture sites. Bone defect size was identified by calculating the radiographic apparent bone gap, as suggested by Haines, et al.1617 The area of the soft-tissue defect was defined as the product of the distance between two vertices in the diagonal direction (cm2 ) after completion of the first surgery by selecting four vertices with the longest side of the defect as the vertex. A follow-up evaluation was conducted to investigate reoperation and bone union status during a follow-up period >1 year. Radiologic and functional results were evaluated based on the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria.18 Radiologic evaluation was conducted to evaluate bone union, timing, and alignment. Bone union was defined as a case in which more than 3/4 of the cortical bone was formed at the fracture site on both anteroposterior and lateral images on simple radiography at follow-up, every 4 weeks after surgery, with no clinical abnormalities, such as pain and claudication, during walking (weight-bearing).19 Malalignment was defined as a case in which deformation, including varus and valgus deformation, was as severe as 10° or more on radiographic examination; the measurement was performed adopting Milner’s method.20 Shortening was defined as a decrease of ≥10 mm in length relative to the healthy side. Nonunion was defined as a case in which complete bone union was not observed at the fracture site on simple radiographs, performed more than 6 months after surgery, or as a case in which bone union did not progress at the 3-month follow-up. Clinically, there was pain or claudication at the fracture site.21 Joint stiffness was defined as a decrease in the range of motion of the knee or ankle joint on the injured side by >20% compared with the range of motion of a healthy joint.22

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (SPSS for Windows release 16.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) to analyze the effect of various factors on ASAMI score. The Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for continuous data, whereas the chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were performed for categorical data. Statistical significance was set at p-values<0.05.

RESULTS

With regard to internal fixation in the second surgery, the type of fixation included intramedullary nailing in 24 patients and plating in 8. The average size of the bone defect was 43.9 mm (9–100 mm), and the area of the soft-tissue defect was 79.3 cm2 (34–220 cm2 ). The average time interval from the first to the second surgery (fix and flap surgery) was 10.4 days (5–17 days), and that to the third surgery (bone graft) was 101.6 days (61–158 days). Soft-tissue coverage included a rotational flap in 11 patients and a free flap in 21. Bone union (96.9%) was achieved in all patients except one. The average time to bone union was 9.4 months (4–16 months), and the average follow-up period was 19.1 months (12–41 months) (Table 2).
Table 2

Patient Outcomes

Patient #Implant of definitive surgeryTime between 1st and 2nd surgery (days)Time between 2nd and 3rd surgery (days)Soft tissue coverageUnion time (months)Follow-up (months)ASAMI score (bony results)ASAMI score (functional results)ComplicationAdditional surgery
1IM nailing561Free flap1213ExcellentGoodNoneNone
2IM nailing878Rotational flap825ExcellentExcellentNoneNone
3Plating1297Free flap1412GoodFairKnee joint stiffnessArthrolysis
4IM nailing793Rotational flap617ExcellentExcellentNoneNone
5IM nailing1088Free flap622GoodExcellentNoneNone
6IM nailing14110Rotational flap1331ExcellentExcellentNoneNone
7IM nailing14121Rotational flap617ExcellentGoodGraft site partial necrosisI&D, STSG
8Plating1199Free flap1422ExcellentGoodNoneNone
9IM nailing1287Free flap825GoodGoodSuperficial infectionI&D
10IM nailing1578Free flap616ExcellentFairGraft site partial necrosisI&D, STSG
11IM nailing12123Free flap719GoodExcellentNoneNone
12Plating1093Rotational flap1212FairPoorDeep infectionBK amputation
13Plating9111Free flap922PoorPoorDeep infectionSalvage operation
14Plating1091Rotational flap817ExcellentExcellentNoneNone
15IM nailing1277Rotational flap1219ExcellentGoodNoneNone
16IM nailing7132Free flapNonunion27PoorPoorDeep infectionSalvage operation
17IM nailing17158Free flap941ExcellentExcellentNoneNone
18IM nailing10125Free flap912ExcellentFair10 degrees valgus deformityNone
19Plating17119Free flap617GoodFairNoneNone
20IM nailing10124Free flap421GoodGoodNoneNone
21IM nailing9125Free flap1631ExcellentExcellentNoneNone
22IM nailing5113Free flap1014ExcellentExcellentNoneNone
23IM nailing9126Free flap1319ExcellentExcellentNoneNone
24IM nailing689Free flap1216GoodExcellentNoneNone
25IM nailing1093Free flap1418GoodGoodNoneNone
26IM nailing1397Rotational flap1017ExcellentExcellentNoneNone
27IM nailing8106Free flap1116GoodGoodSuperficial infectionI&D
28IM nailing998Rotational flap913ExcellentExcellentNoneNone
29Plating16111Free flap815ExcellentFairSuperficial infectionI&D
30Plating983Rotational flap618ExcellentExcellentNoneNone
31IM nailing1491Free flap913ExcellentExcellentNoneNone
32IM nailing1268Rotational flap715ExcellentExcellentNoneNone

ASAMI, Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov; IM, intramedullary; I&D, irrigation and debridement; BK, below knee; STSG, split-thickness skin graft.

Microorganisms were cultured in 12 cases (37.5%), where Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii accounted for the highest proportion (Table 3). Complications occurred in 10 patients (31.2%), including three with superficial infection, three with deep infection, two with partial flap skin necrosis, one with malalignment, and one with joint stiffness. Of these, superficial infection was treated by debridement and antibiotic administration without removal of the internal fixator. In one of the three patients (case 13), deep infection occurred after bone union, which was recovered via internal fixator removal, debridement, and antibiotic administration.14 Another patient with deep infection (case 16) was treated by replacing the internal fixator with an external fixator and performing debridement and osteotomy for bone transport. Lastly, in another patient with deep infection (case 12), the infection recurred, even after internal fixator removal and debridement, and the patient’s general condition was poor; thus, below-knee amputation was performed (Fig. 3). Two cases of partial flap skin necrosis were treated using a split-thickness skin graft. In the case of malalignment, conservative treatment was performed with the patient’s consent as the symptoms were mild. Arthrolysis was performed for joint stiffness.
Table 3

Micro-Organisms in Severe Open Tibia Fractures

OrganismNumber of cases
Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus3
Methicillin-resistant S. aureus1
Acinetobacter baumannii 3
Staphylococcus epidermidis 1
Klebsiella pneumoniae 1
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 2
Enterococcus faecium 1
No growth20
Fig. 3

Failure case of staged surgery for tibia open fracture. (A) An 85-year-old male patient with hypertension and diabetes (case 12) was admitted to the trauma center because of a motorcycle accident. The patient had bone loss after distal tibia open fracture (GA type IIIB) and debridement. (B) For this patient, an external fixator was inserted, and antibiotic-coated cement spacer insertion was performed for the bone defect. In addition, negative pressure wound therapy was conducted for soft tissue defects. (C) Since the general conditions and soft tissues were stable after 10 days, plating and cement changing were performed along with reverse sural rotational flap for the posteromedial aspect. (D) In the third surgery, an autogenous bone graft was performed for the bone defect area, followed by plate augmentation. (E) However, surgical wound redness, swelling, and fever manifested a month after the third surgery. With suspicion of infection, repetitive I&D was applied. (F) However, since the general condition deteriorated accompanied by continuous fever and pneumonia, below knee amputation was performed. G-A, Gustilo-Anderson classification; I&D, irrigation and debridement.

Good or better clinical effects were observed in 29 patients (90.6%) in terms of ASAMI radiologic score and 24 patients (75%) in terms of functional score. Radiologic analysis revealed that factors affecting ASAMI score were size of the soft-tissue defect, type of soft-tissue coverage, complications, and additional surgery. Functional results showed significant correlations with injury severity score, types of internal fixation and complications, and additional surgery (Table 4).
Table 4

Statistical Analysis of Factors Influencing Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) Scores

4-1. ASAMI Radiologic Results
VariablePoorFairGoodExcellentTotalp value
Age (yr)49.0±5.78548.0±10.140.5±13.344.5±14.30.057
Sex0.906
Female0 (0)0 (0)1 (25.0)3 (75.0)4
Male2 (7.1)1 (3.6)8 (28.6)17 (60.7)28
Past medical history0.484
None1 (4.0)1 (4.0)6 (24.0)17 (68.0)25
Yes1 (14.3)0 (0.0)3 (42.9)3 (42.9)7
Injury mechanism0.747
Pedestrian0 (0)0 (0)2 (25.0)6 (75.0)8
Motorbike2 (16.7)1 (8.3)3 (25.0)6 (50.0)12
In car0 (0)0 (0)1 (25.0)3 (75.0)4
Direct0 (0)0 (0)3 (37.5)5 (62.5)8
Combined injury0.564
None0 (0)0 (0)4 (30.8)8 (66.7)12
Yes2 (10.0)1 (5.0)5 (25.0)12 (60.0)20
ISS21.5±5.029.014.7±6.914.3±7.215.3±7.40.171
Fracture type0.846
Wedge1 (10.0)0 (0)3 (30.0)6 (60.0)10
Complex1 (4.5)1 (4.5)6 (27.3)14 (63.6)22
G-A type0.906
IIIA0 (0)0 (0)1 (25.0)3 (75.0)4
IIIB2 (7.1)1 (3.6)8 (28.6)17 (60.7)28
Bone defect0.774
Partial1 (6.3)0 (0)5 (31.3)10 (62.5)16
Segmental1 (6.3)1 (6.3)4 (25.0)10 (62.5)16
Soft tissue defect size (cm2)44.0±2.893.099.8±34.572.9±43.379.3±41.20.036
RABG (mm)27.5±17.735.050.1±22.143.3±22.644.0±21.90.457
Implant0.265
IM nail1 (4.2)0 (0)7 (29.2)16 (66.7)24
Plate1 (12.5)1 (12.5)2 (25.0)4 (50.0)8
Soft tissue coverage0.020
Rotational flap0 (0)1 (9.1)0 (0)10 (90.9)11
Free flap2 (9.5)0 (0)9 (42.9)10 (47.6)21
Complication0.050
None0 (0)0 (0)6 (27.3)16 (72.7)22
Yes2 (20.0)1 (10.0)3 (30.0)4 (40.0)10
Additional surgery0.023
No0 (0)0 (0)6 (26.1)17 (73.9)23
Age (yr)53.3±23.242.3±14.842.5±9.043.9±14.444.5±14.30.834
Sex0.515
Female0 (0)0 (0)2 (50.0)2 (50.0)4
Male4 (14.3)4 (14.3)6 (21.4)14 (50.0)28
Past medical history0.433
None3 (12.0)2 (8.0)6 (24.0)14 (56.0)25
Yes1 (14.3)2 (28.6)2 (28.6)2 (28.6)7
Injury mechanism0.324
Pedestrian0 (0)0 (0)3 (37.5)5 (62.5)8
Motorbike4 (33.3)2 (16.7)2 (16.7)4 (33.3)12
In car0 (0)1 (25.0)1 (25.0)2 (50.0)4
Direct0 (0)1 (12.5)2 (25.0)5 (62.5)8
Combined injury0.292
None0 (0)1 (8.3)3 (25.0)8 (66.7)12
Yes4 (20.0)3 (15.0)5 (25.0)8 (40.0)20
ISS24.3±4.614.5±4.418.0±10.211.9±4.315.3±7.40.018
Fracture type0.832
Wedge1 (10.0)2 (20.0)2 (20.0)5 (50.0)10
Complex3 (13.6)2 (9.1)6 (27.3)11 (50.0)22
G-A type0.634
IIIA0 (0)0 (0)1 (25.0)3 (75.0)4
IIIB4 (14.3)4 (14.3)7 (25.0)13 (46.4)28
Bone defect type0.432
Partial1 (6.3)3 (18.8)3 (18.8)9 (56.3)16
Segmental3 (18.8)1 (6.3)5 (31.3)7 (43.8)16
Soft tissue defect size (cm2)72.8±44.063.5±7.4111.7±59.265.7±23.979.3±41.20.147
RABG (mm)31.3±11.138.8±16.359.4±26.140.8±20.144.0±21.90.172
Implant0.034
IM nail1 (4.2)2 (8.3)7 (29.2)14 (58.3)24
Plate3 (37.5)2 (25.0)1 (12.5)2 (25.0)8
Soft tissue coverage0.231
Rotational flap1 (9.1)0 (0.0)2 (18.2)8 (72.7)11
Free flap3 (14.3)4 (19.0)6 (28.6)8 (38.1)21
Complication<0.001
None0 (0)1 (4.5)5 (22.7)16 (72.7)22
Yes4 (40.0)3 (30.0)3 (30.0)0 (0.0)10
Additional surgery<0.001
No0 (0)2 (8.7)5 (21.7)16 (69.6)23
Yes4 (44.4)2 (22.2)3 (33.3)0 (0.0)9

ISS, injury severity score; G-A, Gustilo-Anderson classification; RABG, Radiographic Apparent Bone Gap.

Data are presented as mean±standard deviation or n (%).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that staged surgery using the acute induced membrane technique and soft-tissue reconstruction may be performed for very unstable high-energy open tibial fractures with bone and soft-tissue defects to achieve a high bone union rate and functional recovery. In this study, patients who experienced complications and underwent additional surgeries showed poor radiologic and functional outcomes. In particular, infection was the most common complication.23 Lack, et al.24 reported that deep infection occurred in 24 (17.5%) of 137 patients with type III open tibial fractures. Mohseni, et al.25 reported that infection occurred in 16% and 32% of patients treated with intramedullary nailing and an external fixator, respectively. In the present study, the complication rate was 31.2% (10 patients), and the range of complications was strictly defined in this study. There were only three patients (9.4%) with deep infections, for which amputation or salvage was considered. In this study, functional outcomes were significantly influenced by the type of internal fixator used. This was interpreted by timing discrepancies in return to daily life between the two internal fixators. Nailing allows for a rapid return to daily life because it is commonly used for tibial shaft fractures, placed inside the bone, requires less amount of bone graft (as much as the width of the nail), and allows for full weight-bearing immediately after the second surgery.11 On the other hand, plate fixation was found to yield lower scores, owing to the relatively late timing of standing and weight-bearing because of the relatively larger amount of bone graft and inevitable direct exposure to the external environment due to extramedullary fixation.26 The authors attempted to perform fixation with nailing in as many cases as possible, and plate fixation was performed only for cases in which fixation with nailing was challenging because the fracture site was located in the proximal or distal tibia. In addition, patients with higher injury severity scores had severe trauma extending to the lower extremity, resulting in poor prognosis owing to a prolonged stay in bed and slow rehabilitation therapy progression, because of which their functional scores seemed to become statistically significantly low. Interestingly, the influencing factors of the ASAMI radiologic results included soft tissue injuries, such as the defect size and coverage type of soft tissue; this is because a more severe injury to soft tissue is associated with a lower blood supply and poorer conditions around the bone. This leads to a vulnerability to nonunion and infection. The induced membrane technique, also known as the Masquelet technique, was initiated by performing a wide resection of the infected bone and filling the defect site with ACS, followed by bone grafting for chronic osteomyelitis or post-traumatic septic nonunion.27 Based on satisfactory clinical outcomes, the histological and biochemical characteristics of the membrane formed around the cement were examined. The results indicated that the membrane was a vascularized layer rich in growth factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2),2829 which increased mechanical strength. The use of cement, which is significantly stronger than bone, may enhance mechanical stability, unlike making the site of the bone defect a dead space and leaving fibrotic tissue. In combination with an internal fixator, such as a plate or nail, patients can return to daily life even before autogenous bone graft.13 Rehabilitation treatment was initiated after the second surgery and was a significant advantage of staged surgery, as this was not possible with other surgical options. Hatashita, et al.16 recently reported that good clinical outcomes were obtained by the “acute Masquelet technique,” where ACS was used for open lower limb fractures accompanied by bone loss. However, in their study, there were only three cases of tibial fractures, and deep infection occurred in one case. Due to the anatomical structure of the tibia, the anteromedial region is a subcutaneous layer, and soft-tissue damage is frequently caused by open fractures.2 Here, blood supply is relatively lower than that in the humerus and femur. Moreover, it is difficult to perform staged treatment when there is a higher risk of infection. In such conditions, the success rate could be improved by utilizing the three-stage treatment devised in this study, which comprises sufficient examination and careful operation of the bone and soft-tissue conditions. In general, bone defect treatment is determined by considering the size of the defect. Several studies have reported that bone defects <5 cm can be treated with autogenous bone grafts, while bone defects >5 cm may be treated using the induced membrane technique (Masquelet technique), distraction osteogenesis, and vascularized fibular transfer.1630 However, there are no experimental and biomechanical criteria regarding size, and this rule appears to have been formulated considering the donor-site morbidity in autogenous bone grafts. Distraction osteogenesis requires using an external fixator long-term, with a risk of infection and daily life inconveniences. Vascularized fibular transfer has a low survival rate, as it is technically difficult to perform microsurgery. As long as there is sufficient autogenous bone, the induced membrane technique is the safest and most reliable method for filling bone defects.28 Therefore, the authors performed an iliac bone graft for defect sites >5 cm. If the amount of autogenic bone was insufficient, it was mixed with a DBM for insertion.31 As Cho, et al.32 suggested, circumferential bone grafting was performed around an absorbable gelatin sponge core inserted into the intramedullary area to reduce the amount of autogenous bone required. The timing of bone grafting is an important factor. In this study, an autogenous bone graft was performed at the last surgery. Some authors have reported a high success rate by performing internal fixation and bone grafting at the same time.33 However, performing autogenous bone graft in addition to fix and flap surgery lengthens the operation time excessively, resulting in a higher risk of infection. Moreover, the risk of aftereffects is higher when the surgery fails because of limited donor site and high morbidity. Therefore, in this study, bone grafting was not performed during soft-tissue reconstruction; the bone graft was performed using autologous iliac bone after confirming that the soft tissue had healed and no infection was found, which took an average of 3 months.10 This treatment was based on observations by Salmi, et al.34 who reported that microvascularization took approximately 3 months after flap surgery. In clinical observations, the cluster around the wound was completely healed approximately 3 months after soft-tissue reconstruction.35 Therefore, in this study, an autogenous bone graft was performed after ensuring that there were no complications, such as infection and soft-tissue necrosis, through the course of staged surgery. While the methods of covering soft-tissue defects include free flap and rotational flap in open fractures, it is difficult to create a rotational flap using the surrounding soft tissue because an open fracture causes serious damage to the surrounding soft tissue.36 Therefore, in this study, soft tissue restoration with a free flap was preferred. In terms of reconstruction timing, Godina reported that performing flap surgery within 72 h after injury was effective for the prevention of infection.37 Gopal, et al.38 reported that performing flap surgery within 72 h resulted in a bone infection rate reduction of approximately 3%. However, due to the high-energy and multiple injuries in most patients, there is a risk of prolonged surgery and anesthesia with flap surgery at an early stage. There are also several limitations, as emergency flap surgery requires many experienced medical staff members and facilities. There is an ongoing controversy regarding the timing of flap surgery for soft-tissue restoration. A recent study by D’Alleyrand, et al.39 also reported that there was no significant difference in the risk associated with flap surgery within 7 days; however, after that, the risk of complications, such as infection, increased by 16% each day. There was no failure of flap surgery in this study, but there were two cases of split-thickness skin graft due to partial necrosis. Both cases occurred in patients for whom it took more than 14 days after the injury until flap surgery. This study has some limitations. First, the number of participants was relatively small, as only patients with open tibial fractures accompanied by soft-tissue and bone defects were included, and there was no control group. Second, patient compliance was not considered. Third, the follow-up period was relatively short (approximately 1 year). Therefore, there are limitations in determining the incidence and recurrence of infection in patients. However, considering that the average outpatient follow-up period was 19.1 months and that severe complications from open fractures generally appear within 1 year, we believe there is sufficient evidence for the efficacy of this staged surgery.40 Finally, this retrospective study analyzed the efficacy of staged surgery based on clinical and radiological results. Therefore, there is a need for a prospective randomized study to corroborate our results. In conclusion, despite many advances in the treatment of open tibial fractures with extensive soft-tissue and bone defect injuries in terms of soft-tissue reconstruction and lower limb salvage, treatment of open tibial fractures remains challenging. The vital goals to optimal treatment of such injuries include infection removal, bone stability restoration, and soft tissues reconstruction. Staged surgery using the acute induced membrane technique and soft-tissue reconstructive surgery proposed in this study appears to be a safe and feasible treatment for open tibial fractures with soft-tissue and bone defects.
  38 in total

Review 1.  Diaphyseal long bone nonunions - types, aetiology, economics, and treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Markus Rupp; Christoph Biehl; Matthäus Budak; Ulrich Thormann; Christian Heiss; Volker Alt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018

Authors:  Eric G Meinberg; Julie Agel; Craig S Roberts; Matthew D Karam; James F Kellam
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 3.  Rehabilitation after plate fixation of upper and lower extremity fractures.

Authors:  Niloofar Dehghan; Sean M Mitchell; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses.

Authors:  R B Gustilo; J T Anderson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Staged bone grafting for the management of segmental long bone defects caused by trauma or infection using induced-membrane technique.

Authors:  Talaat Taher El-Hadidi; Hesham Mesbah Soliman; Hazem Ahmed Farouk; Mustafa Abd El-Mogeeb Radwan
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.500

Review 6.  The treatment of infected tibial nonunion by bone transport using the Ilizarov external fixator and a systematic review of infected tibial nonunion treated by Ilizarov methods.

Authors:  P Yin; Q Zhang; Z Mao; T Li; L Zhang; P Tang
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.500

7.  Not All Gustilo Type IIIB Fractures Are Created Equal: Arterial Injury Impacts Limb Salvage Outcomes.

Authors:  John T Stranix; Z-Hye Lee; Adam Jacoby; Lavinia Anzai; Tomer Avraham; Vishal D Thanik; Pierre B Saadeh; Jamie P Levine
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  'Acute Masquelet technique' for reconstructing bone defects of an open lower limb fracture.

Authors:  Satoshi Hatashita; Ryoichi Kawakami; Soichi Ejiri; Nobuyuki Sasaki; Narihiro Toshiki; Masayuki Ito; Shin-Ichi Konno; Michiyuki Hakozaki
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Osteomyelitis in grade II and III open tibia fractures with late debridement.

Authors:  K Kindsfater; E A Jonassen
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Treatment principles in the management of open fractures.

Authors:  William W Cross; Marc F Swiontkowski
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.