Literature DB >> 3467034

Neurosensory disturbance with rigid fixation of the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.

G J Nishioka, M K Zysset, J E Van Sickels.   

Abstract

Twenty-one patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomies using rigid fixation were evaluated by neurosensory testing. Neurosensory tests included light touch (LT), brush stroke direction (BSD), two-point discrimination (2-P), and temperature (T). Tests were conducted using the two-alternate forced choice method. The density of neurosensory disturbance was examined as well as the incidence of neurosensory disturbance as it correlated with age of the patient. The incidence of neurosensory disturbance was 45.2% (19/42) to LT, 52.4% (22/42) to BSD, 33.3% (14/42) to 2-P and 7.1% (3/42) to T. The majority of demonstrable neurosensory disturbances were not dense. Increased age was associated with an increased incidence of neurosensory disturbance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3467034     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(87)90081-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  9 in total

1.  A morphometric analysis of the mandibular canal by cone beam computed tomography and its relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Vinícius de Carvalho Machado; Björn Gjelvold
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-02-13

2.  Evaluation of neurosensory disturbance following orthognathic surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  Saikrishna Degala; Sujeeth Kumar Shetty; M Bhanumathi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

3.  Qualitative descriptors used by patients following orthognathic surgery to portray altered sensation.

Authors:  Ceib Phillips; Greg Essick; John Zuniga; Myron Tucker; George Blakey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Mechanical frequency and stimulation-site-related differences in vibrotactile detection capacity along the lip vermilion in young adults.

Authors:  R D Andreatta; J H Davidow
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Sensory retraining after orthognathic surgery: effect on patients' perception of altered sensation.

Authors:  Ceib Phillips; Greg Essick; John S Preisser; Timothy A Turvey; Myron Tucker; Dongming Lin
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 6.  Inferior alveolar nerve injury following orthognathic surgery: a review of assessment issues.

Authors:  C Phillips; G Essick
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.837

7.  The Direction of Double-Jaw Surgery Relapse for Correction of Skeletal Class III Deformity: Bilateral Sagittal Split Versus Intraoral Vertical Ramus Setback Osteotomies.

Authors:  Ra'ed Mohammed Ayoub Al-Delayme; Ali Arkan Redha Alsagban; Fires Taha Ahmed; Ahmad Farag; Tumouh Al-Allaq; Parveen Virdee; Zaid Alnajjar; Sufian Alaa Ibraheem Alsamaraie; Salih Elnashef; Layla Arab; Alaa Yassin; Moutaz Al-Khen
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-06-04

8.  Inferior alveolar nerve dysfunction in mandibular fractures: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chandan S N; Sujeeth Kumar Shetty; Sahith Kumar Shetty; Anjan Kumar Shah
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  Risk factors of neurosensory disturbance following orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Albraa Badr Alolayan; Yiu Yan Leung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.