Literature DB >> 21058973

Inferior alveolar nerve injury following orthognathic surgery: a review of assessment issues.

C Phillips1, G Essick.   

Abstract

The sensory branches of the trigeminal nerve encode information about facial expressions, speaking and chewing movements, and stimuli that come into contact with the orofacial tissues. Whatever the cause, damage to the inferior alveolar nerve negatively affects the quality of facial sensibility as well as the patient's ability to translate patterns of altered nerve activity into functionally meaningful motor behaviours. There is no generally accepted, standard method of estimating sensory disturbances in the distribution of the inferior alveolar nerve following injury. Assessment of sensory alterations can be conducted using three types of measures: (i) objective electrophysiological measures of nerve conduction, (ii) sensory testing (stimulus) measures and (iii) patient report. Each type of measure with advantages and disadvantages for use are reviewed.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21058973      PMCID: PMC3094736          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02176.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  60 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology of peripheral nerve injury: a brief review.

Authors:  Mark G Burnett; Eric L Zager
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  Neurosensory deficits after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible--influence of soft tissue handling medial to the ascending ramus.

Authors:  K Panula; K Finne; K Oikarinen
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  The anatomical location of the mandibular canal: its relationship to the sagittal ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  J Rajchel; E Ellis; R J Fonseca
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1986

4.  Sensory retraining: burden in daily life related to altered sensation after orthognathic surgery, a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  C Phillips; S H Kim; M Tucker; T A Turvey
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Efficacy of steroid treatment for sensory impairment after orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Kenji Seo; Yutaka Tanaka; Makoto Terumitsu; Genji Someya
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Recovery of nerve injury after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Diagnostic value of clinical and electrophysiologic tests in the follow-up.

Authors:  T Teerijoki-Oksa; S K Jääskeläinen; K Forssell; H Forssell
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Sensory regeneration following intraoperatively verified trigeminal nerve injury.

Authors:  S K Jääskeläinen; T Teerijoki-Oksa; A Virtanen; O Tenovuo; H Forssell
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  An evaluation of clinical and electrophysiologic tests in nerve injury diagnosis after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy.

Authors:  T Teerijoki-Oksa; S Jääskeläinen; K Forssell; A Virtanen; H Forssell
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Development and validation of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory.

Authors:  Didier Bouhassira; Nadine Attal; Jacques Fermanian; Haiel Alchaar; Michèle Gautron; Etienne Masquelier; Sylvie Rostaing; Michel Lanteri-Minet; Elisabeth Collin; Jacques Grisart; François Boureau
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Trigeminal nerve hypesthesia after sagittal split osteotomy in setback cases: correlation of postoperative computed tomography and long-term trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Kiyomasa Nakagawa; Koichiro Ueki; Shigeyuki Takatsuka; Etsuhide Yamamoto
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of preoperative mandibular canal position as it relates to postoperative neurosensory disturbance following the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  J Rich; B A Golden; C Phillips
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Evaluation of Long-term Outcomes of Facial Sensation following Cranial Vault Reconstruction for Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Jana Dengler; Emily S Ho; Erin L Klar; John H Phillips; Christopher R Forrest
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-03-11

3.  Canal-Net for automatic and robust 3D segmentation of mandibular canals in CBCT images using a continuity-aware contextual network.

Authors:  Bo-Soung Jeoun; Su Yang; Sang-Jeong Lee; Tae-Il Kim; Jun-Min Kim; Jo-Eun Kim; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Sam-Sun Lee; Min-Suk Heo; Won-Jin Yi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Comparison of postoperative paresthesia after sagittal split osteotomy among different fixation methods: a one year follow-up study.

Authors:  Reza Tabrizi; Kousha Bakrani; Farshid Bastami
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-08-28

5.  Complications or rather side effects? Quantification of patient satisfaction and complications after orthognathic surgery-a retrospective, cross-sectional long-term analysis.

Authors:  Daniel G E Thiem; Daniel Schneider; Michael Hammel; Bassam Saka; Bernhard Frerich; Bilal Al-Nawas; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.573

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.