Literature DB >> 34668174

Non-invasive neurostimulation modulates processing of spatial frequency information in rapid perception of faces.

Bhuvanesh Awasthi1,2.   

Abstract

This study used high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) to examine how low and high spatial frequency filtered faces are processed. Response times were measured in a task where healthy young adults categorised spatially filtered hybrid faces, presented at foveal and peripheral blocks, while sham and high-frequency random noise was applied to a lateral occipito-temporal location on their scalp. Both the Frequentist and Bayesian approaches show that in contrast to sham, active stimulation significantly reduced response times to peripherally presented low spatial frequency information. This finding points to a possible plasticity in targeted regions induced by non-invasive neuromodulation of spatial frequency information in rapid perception of faces.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes factor; Face perception; Response times; Spatial frequency; Transcranial random noise stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34668174     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02384-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  51 in total

1.  Anodal-tDCS over the human right occipital cortex enhances the perception and memory of both faces and objects.

Authors:  Marica Barbieri; Marcello Negrini; Michael A Nitsche; Davide Rivolta
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend.

Authors:  Nuala Brady; Mark Campbell; Mary Flaherty
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Processing of low spatial frequency faces at periphery in choice reaching tasks.

Authors:  Bhuvanesh Awasthi; Jason Friedman; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Faster, stronger, lateralized: low spatial frequency information supports face processing.

Authors:  Bhuvanesh Awasthi; Jason Friedman; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science.

Authors:  Andy Clark
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  Early-stage visual processing and cortical amplification deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Pamela D Butler; Vance Zemon; Isaac Schechter; Alice M Saperstein; Matthew J Hoptman; Kelvin O Lim; Nadine Revheim; Gail Silipo; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-05

7.  Non-invasive brain stimulation targeting the right fusiform gyrus selectively increases working memory for faces.

Authors:  Tad T Brunyé; Joseph M Moran; Amanda Holmes; Caroline R Mahoney; Holly A Taylor
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Examining the role of red background in magnocellular contribution to face perception.

Authors:  Bhuvanesh Awasthi; Mark A Williams; Jason Friedman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Rectilinear Edge Selectivity Is Insufficient to Explain the Category Selectivity of the Parahippocampal Place Area.

Authors:  Peter B Bryan; Joshua B Julian; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Why You Should Report Bayes Factors in Your Transcranial Brain Stimulation Studies.

Authors:  Anna Lena Biel; Elisabeth V C Friedrich
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.